Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain raises security alert level to critical - highest level indicating terror attacks imminent
AP News Alert ^ | June 30, 2007

Posted on 06/30/2007 12:24:22 PM PDT by HAL9000

Britain raises its security alert level to critical - the highest possible level indicating terror attacks are imminent.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: britain; criticalalert; england; eurabia; gla; glasgow; globaljihad; jihadineurope; london; scotland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-282 next last
To: pacelvi

I did, yes, and of course there is a worrying minority of Muslims in the UK who seem intent on attacking us. However, people have often tried to intimidate Britain by terrorism and all have failed. These Islamic fundamentalists are just the latest bunch. The British will just continue with a stiff upper lip as always.


61 posted on 06/30/2007 12:54:02 PM PDT by uksupport1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

“You’re right. 9/11 was never repeated, thanks to President Bush and his attentive leadership.”

We also were damn lucky our wide open borders were not exploited. We have a gigantic achilies heel in the WOT.


62 posted on 06/30/2007 12:54:24 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: angcat

you assume they’re only going to nuke one city.


63 posted on 06/30/2007 12:54:34 PM PDT by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: uksupport1

“However, people have often tried to intimidate Britain by terrorism and all have failed.”

yeah.. but its not the same is it... the other groups just wanted stuff.. these Muslims just want you dead.

i hope you’re right about your countrymen... the impression we get over here is that the PC-rot is quite entrenched.


64 posted on 06/30/2007 12:57:04 PM PDT by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: pacelvi
No but that is the first target and always has been. I’m listening to FOX and that Martha chick just said this is an amateur attack. Martha is a moonbat and I wonder what gives her the knowledge to call all this the work of amateur's. What kind of attack does a moonbat consider a professional attack.
65 posted on 06/30/2007 12:57:11 PM PDT by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: angcat

An amateur terrorist attack? That might as well be said of “amateur rape” or “amateur beheading”. Good God...


66 posted on 06/30/2007 12:59:49 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Man them sophisticated intelligence networks are really something. Talk about “threat matrix”.

How do they do it?

What was the initial indicator? The bomb in the night club or the burning airport terminal/ The firecracker in the Queen mum’s chamberpot?

Nothing gets by these guys.


67 posted on 06/30/2007 1:00:52 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (I never consented to live in the Camp of the Saints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Well, the war in Iraq is no more unpopular in the UK than in the US and most British people strongly supported the more clear-cut intervention in Afghanistan. There was much speculation in some papers (and hope in the left-wing of the Labour party) that Brown would turn away from Blair’s stance on Iraq. In reality that hasn’t happened and it now appears that Brown is commited to Blair’s Iraq plans. Politically in the UK the government isn’t facing the quasi-rebellion that Bush faces from Congress on Iraq. In Afghanistan, even a Labour leader to the left of Brown wouldn’t pull out of there. It is widely seen as an uncontroversial, necessary conflict (hence British troops taking on key responsibility for the violent south of that country over the last year). Brown is known to be a very tough leader in private, hence his ‘Stalinist’ label in many commentaries. He wouldn’t wobble because of these terrorist attacks. In Britain, we have faced much worse in the past.


68 posted on 06/30/2007 1:01:12 PM PDT by uksupport1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
our borders haven't been exploited? lol



They aren't here for the weather.. they waiting for the time to come.



That these groups are allowed to be here is treason. The major groups learned the lesson about attacking us massively and riling us up. now they're entrenching themseles EVERYWHERE waiting for the signal.

Sure the Sudden Jihad Syndrome folks have been caught cocking the gun..but they're not tied into the mothership in Qom/Mecca/Waziristan.
69 posted on 06/30/2007 1:01:29 PM PDT by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
Achilles heel? The bastards are INVITING the terrorists in.



"Our #1 job priority is keeping the US border porous and giving Amnesty to all terrorists."


70 posted on 06/30/2007 1:02:03 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion

Ameuter nuclear fission attack.

oh thank god it was just ameuters!

lol


71 posted on 06/30/2007 1:02:41 PM PDT by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: angcat
What kind of attack does a moonbat consider a professional attack?

The kind that makes them put on a burka... and pray with their ass up in the air.

72 posted on 06/30/2007 1:02:54 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: pacelvi

I meant exploited for another successful major attack. Clearly some bad guys have got in because of our failure to secure the border. If something happens and we find out the terrorists entered through our southern border, the administration should bear the brunt of criticism.


73 posted on 06/30/2007 1:03:57 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

oh and that map is 5 years old.. God only knows how busy that map is now.


74 posted on 06/30/2007 1:04:07 PM PDT by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: pacelvi

It’s not all just caterwauling and whining on the internet. There are lots of constructive suggestions.


75 posted on 06/30/2007 1:04:36 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (I never consented to live in the Camp of the Saints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

why is john waters in that picture?


76 posted on 06/30/2007 1:05:11 PM PDT by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Czar; janetgreen; CottonBall

ping


77 posted on 06/30/2007 1:06:05 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacelvi
Want to bet their weaponry has increased because of a LAX
federal government (more interested in attacking US citizens)?
78 posted on 06/30/2007 1:06:06 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: pacelvi

I’m sad to hear that that is your impression of the UK. Depite a terrible terrorist attack in London in July 2005 and many other thwarted polts, the UK hasn’t changed its stance in the War on Terror (and presence in Ireq and Afghanistan) one jot. In fact, we increased our force levels in Afghanistan in 2006. The UK can often seem ‘cold’ to terrorist attacks to foreign observers. But in reality, the British people are stoical and don’t like to give any impression of being rattled by these thugs. They have too much experience of such things in the past to let it trouble them. As for PC, well I love America, but you guys invented that concept and the UK is still way behind you. We have nothing at all like the ACLU for example.


79 posted on 06/30/2007 1:07:17 PM PDT by uksupport1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

“I meant exploited for another successful major attack”..

give a jihadi a chance! :)


80 posted on 06/30/2007 1:07:45 PM PDT by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-282 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson