Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EDITORIAL: A setback to equality
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 6/29/7 | Editor

Posted on 06/29/2007 1:26:44 PM PDT by SmithL

JUNE 28, 2007, will be remembered as a shameful day in the long, elusive battle to instill equal opportunity in American schools.

The U.S. Supreme Court's twisted logic in limiting a school district's ability to take race into account as a way to end racial segregation echoes the court's Plessy vs. Ferguson ruling of 1896. That ruling put the imprimatur on "separate but equal" policies that allowed racial discrimination and oppression to flourish for more than half-a-century more.

The 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision, fortunately, drove a dagger into Plessy's heart -- until Thursday, when a court invigorated by two new conservative justices moved to resuscitate it.

...

The court's rulings represent a triumph for advocates of "colorblind policies," such as Ward Connerly, the former University of California regent who began the assault on the use of race in public institutions when he persuaded the Board of Regents to ban affirmative action at the university in 1995.

For years, Connerly has invoked the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s call for people to be judged by the "content of their character" rather than the color of the skin. But wishing for a colorblind society does not make it so.

We, too, believe people should be judged by the content of their character -- in a society of equal opportunity. We are equally sure that the great civil rights leader would have been appalled by the Supreme Court's rulings this week -- and would be mourning the nation's backward movement toward school segregation.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: areturntoequality; busing; integration; racistliberals; racists; ruling; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2007 1:26:45 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

The Comicle is in favor of State-sponsored racism.


2 posted on 06/29/2007 1:27:21 PM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Inequality = equality. Equality = inequality. Got it?


3 posted on 06/29/2007 1:28:38 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I’ll bet that the author of this editorial lives in a Chappaqua-like suburb of SF that’s 95.8% white and 2.1% Asian (as in Cal Tech/MIT graduate Asian).
4 posted on 06/29/2007 1:30:17 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative ("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Thank goodness the Chronicle is against the decision. Otherwise I’d have to rethink my position on it.


5 posted on 06/29/2007 1:30:20 PM PDT by The Blitherer (What would a Free Man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

What a kook.


6 posted on 06/29/2007 1:32:00 PM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

You don’t end racism by using it.


7 posted on 06/29/2007 1:32:12 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
It's a shame the "idiotorialist" who wrote this screed doesn't understand that it is equality of opportunity and not outcome that is the goal. Quotas support outcome-based equality, not the opportunity to be rewarded for excellence.
8 posted on 06/29/2007 1:32:25 PM PDT by MortMan (Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

THIS IS A HUGE setback for the racists on the left and those making a living by their race-baiting techniques. We once had preference afforded whites, then for 40 years afforded blacks, now back to a level playing field and a race-blinded admissions process.


9 posted on 06/29/2007 1:34:25 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
“The Comicle is in favor of State-sponsored racism.”

The Dim’s have, throughout their entire history, been in favor of discrimination on the basis of race. The only thing that changes is which race (or sex nowadays) should suffer the discrimination.

10 posted on 06/29/2007 1:37:05 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“We are equally sure that the great civil rights leader would have been appalled by the Supreme Court’s rulings this week...”

Shouldn’t that have been: “We are equally sure that the Great Civil Rights Leader would have been appalled by the Supreme Court’s rulings this week...”


11 posted on 06/29/2007 1:37:29 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Funny how the very same people writing this editorial told us back in the '60s that they were only looking for equal opportunity, not preferences and quotas.

Oops. We lied. We want some pigs to be more equal than others.

Funny about that.

12 posted on 06/29/2007 1:39:32 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The editorial board of the Chronicle will be crying in their designer beer at the S&M leather bar tonight!
13 posted on 06/29/2007 1:40:35 PM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
I’ll bet that the author of this editorial lives in a Chappaqua-like suburb of SF that’s 95.8% white and 2.1% Asian (as in Cal Tech/MIT graduate Asian)

That would be Marin County, and the ratios are close to that....few more Asians.

14 posted on 06/29/2007 1:41:54 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Sheer constitutional illiteracy at the Chron. This decision, far from resuscitating Plessy, is in the spirit of the Plessy dissent!


15 posted on 06/29/2007 1:42:08 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Treating people equally, regardless of race, is “A Setback To Equality.”

BizzaroWorld.


16 posted on 06/29/2007 1:45:33 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

“Inequality = equality. Equality = inequality.”

That about sums it up.

I have never understood the “we will overcome racism by doing certain things based on race” mentality.


17 posted on 06/29/2007 1:45:39 PM PDT by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The white population in some areas is below 50% of the population. Will they be elligible for set asides and special considerations when they fall to second or third rank status?

Or does their collective “guilt” of heritage mean they should always have to give a little more?


18 posted on 06/29/2007 1:46:27 PM PDT by weegee (If the Fairness Doctrine is imposed on USA who will CNN news get to read the conservative rebuttal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE

It certainly doesn’t lead to colorblindness. It requires that everyone take notice.

As to MLK Jr., he was starting to buy into arguments of class issues.

Should we be bussing wealthy families’ kids to the ghetto and telling them that their costly private schools set up a two tiered system for education/discrimination?


19 posted on 06/29/2007 1:49:43 PM PDT by weegee (If the Fairness Doctrine is imposed on USA who will CNN news get to read the conservative rebuttal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The court's rulings represent a triumph for advocates of "colorblind policies,"

If racism is truly a bad thing, shouldn't all policies be 'colorblind'?

20 posted on 06/29/2007 1:54:19 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson