Posted on 06/29/2007 4:14:31 AM PDT by Truth29
DUBYA'S END
BORDER BILL THE LAST BLOW
June 29, 2007 -- PRESIDENT Bush's disastrous second term has not been without its moments. Unfortunately for him, these moments have come primarily when members of his own party have risen up against him to defy his wishes. That's what happened yesterday. For the second time in four weeks, Republicans in the Senate put a stake through the heart of Bush's beloved but politically catastrophic immigration bill.
It's also what happened in the early months of the second term, when Bush chose to nominate his unqualified aide, Harriet Miers, to the Supreme Court - and finally backed down and had her withdraw her name after three weeks of lobbying and complaining.
(snip)
He would not and could not back down on immigration reform, an issue far too close to his heart. But after the Senate first rejected the bill at the end of May, Bush could have left it alone and accepted defeat. He could have seen reason, as he did in January 2004 when he first proposed a piece of legislation and was met with an uprising from his conservative base - whereupon he prudently dropped the subject because he was running for re-election and needed a united and enthusiastic Republican electorate behind him.
(snip)
And perhaps most interesting, Bush chose to believe it was more important to court potential future Republican voters - those illegals who would have gained a "path to citizenship" under the terms of the bill in 13 years' time - rather than listen to the concerns of present-day Republican voters.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
And now the party will be so badly divided going into 2008 and fight such a headwind of discontent over Bush, that it could be a disaster.
“both Bush administrations have done a remarkably good job on justices”
I am from NH and I think Souter is a piece of S&*T.
No point in crying over spilt milk, nor feuding over it.
The AMNESTY bill’s defeat has given new voice and power to Conservatives(not Republicans), we should work on expanding that, reclaim the small government tax cutting penumbra and carry forward — The time is ripe.
He## will freeze over before Bush gets militant about building the border fence. It just won’t happen with his personality and political stances.
I don’t think ‘run against Bush’ is the way, just acknowledge his mistakes and promise not to follow the same line. Be gentle but be firm. I don’t ascribe to Bush bashing at all. Sarkozy was very careful about what he did, and it worked. We should learn from that.
The AMNESTY debate proved we can do it as well, you do not have to attack Bush to make your point.
Agreed.
GREAT idea. You're in charge of that one. ;-)
These two little sentences have more power and truth than most of what I have read on the issue in the past 3 years.
Oh, and did I mention that I agree with you completely?
You are absolutely correct...that's what I saw too. He actually looked more shocked than when he was first informed about 9-11, imho.
A stunning blow to him, obviously.
I love it. You're on a roll! (And love your tag line too.)
Well today, a poll said that over 50% of Americans will never vote for Her Highness. Ohio might or might not go for Dems. Let us see if our GOP nominee can stand for something that would bring back voters to the fold. I concur with your first statements. W did do good on SCOTUS, the WOT, tax cuts but then nothing more seemed to have anything with his BASE and their agendas.
You’ve got that wrong. One of the “FEW” Republicans was the “LEADER” of the Republican Party. Republicans did NOT defeat it, Conservatives did. Republican and Conservative are not synonymous.
Bush allowing Kennedy to write his immigration bill for him showed the Base who’s side Bush was on.
Bush ready to switch Parties yet?
Those of us on the ground, in the trenches always knew this. Makes on wonder if the so called Republicans weren't fully aware of this too.
Well said. I was a supporter of W in both elections. I used to frame all those "autographed" photos of him and Laura that I got for sending in contributions, and used to get a kick out of receiving a Christmas card from the White House.
Well, I've thrown all that stuff away. It was bad enough that Jorge got behind this bill, but when he started dissing fellow Republicans for rejecting Shamnesty, he really went too far. I'd probably still re-vote for him if I could go back in time, but I'd certainly have to hold my nose to do so.
For the most part, I do now see W as a failure. Not on the epic level of Jimmah, but a failure, nonetheless. He failed to veto McCain/Feingold when he had a chance; failed to fire Norm Mineta because it wasn't PC; failed to move our troops out of the line of fire once their mission was accomplished, and instead kept them right in the middle of an internecine struggle between various factions of a barbaric death cult; and now Shamnesty. Even if I am wrong on where Iraq should have gone, he failed to sell the American people on his plans in the ME. W was better than Gore or Kerry would have been, but not much better, IMO.
No matter how effective Bush-bots feel he has been in the W.O.T., he has seriously undermined national security in his failure to see the importance of border security.
Like how .. those loons don't pay any attention to what the President or anyone else says
How do you debate people who don't want to admit reality .. those loons don't think terrorism is a major issue
You really think that will work??
get real
Oh, you're not trying to change the mind of the loons. Just the centrists who can be swayed by the loons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.