Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just like the politicians are ignoring the majority of Americans on amnesty, they are ignoring our crumbling highways and bridges. You can't just build a freeway anymore or even widen them because 20 environmental impact studies or some similar crap stops everything in its tracks.
1 posted on 06/27/2007 8:01:22 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AngelesCrestHighway
our infrastructure is simply crumbling

Alaska, with next to no infrastructure to crumble, feels the pain.

2 posted on 06/27/2007 8:05:31 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

The U.S. has had the world’s largest economy since 1860, according to figures I’ve seen.


3 posted on 06/27/2007 8:06:04 AM PDT by BushMeister ("We are a nation that has a government - not the other way around." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

I’ll give this a great big, “DUH!!!!!”

China builds a 120 MPH frieght railway to it’s interior, while we tear up track for “Walking Paths”...

We spend BILLIONS to rebuild a single interchange, instead of spending less than the yearly interest payment to help start up a rail service on existing track that would relieve the traffic that requires the rebuild in the first place.

We build HUGE, monsterous sky palaces while small city after small city drops off the air service network.

Infrastructure isn’t nearly as politicly sexy as a Senior Center, or a pretty and new Forest Service Welcome Center that they can’t afford to staff.

Our priorities have been screwed up for a LONG time now...


4 posted on 06/27/2007 8:06:30 AM PDT by tcrlaf (VOTE Democrat! You don't those stinkin' Freedoms anyway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
To eliminate its weaknesses, the United States would have to spend about $160 billion a year over five years, Roth added. That total of $800 billion is not so different from the $700 billion in estimated direct spending on the war in Iraq.

At least this is a serious assessment that has not been politicized in any way.

5 posted on 06/27/2007 8:08:54 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Not only is it roads and things as such, there are a lot of electrical utility companies & the government that are now realising the electrical grids in this country are in need of major upgrades, other countries around the world are hot markets for new electrical infrastructure.


6 posted on 06/27/2007 8:10:15 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
"The American public is really aware of infrastructure,

I agree with him to an extent...but I think most people are really only aware of our infrastructure when it fails. That it requires maintenance is probably never given much thought.
7 posted on 06/27/2007 8:12:37 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Highways and bridges don’t vote.

Assistance program recipients do.

Three guesses who gets the money.


8 posted on 06/27/2007 8:12:56 AM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Our politicians would rather provide us with bread and circuses..


12 posted on 06/27/2007 8:34:50 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
Is aging infrastructure slowing the U.S.?

No, but our aging drivers are.

13 posted on 06/27/2007 8:42:57 AM PDT by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway; JohnGalt

Who is John Galt?


14 posted on 06/27/2007 8:56:41 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Confidence in Congress has hit an all-time low of 14%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
Just rename all the highways, bridges, airports and phone companies after Robert Byrd and they'll get funding.

Problem solved. Next!

15 posted on 06/27/2007 8:58:19 AM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
Is aging infrastructure slowing the U.S.?

Yes.
The "It's all about me" society and stategic social planning are fatally and permanently incompatible.

One hundred percent of the large projects that created the greatest culture in the world, would not be possible today.

Next question...

16 posted on 06/27/2007 8:59:38 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

The press has been whining about “aging infrastructure” for 30 years. I was a reporter in the early 80’s and remember dozens of stories just like this one.


18 posted on 06/27/2007 9:13:04 AM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Not altogether surprising that a group of engineers recommend infrastructure improvements. As my dad used to tell me, never ask a tire salesman if you need new tires.


20 posted on 06/27/2007 9:16:44 AM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

To me this all sounds suspiciously like the “crumbling schools” from every Democrat stump speech for the last 20 years. This kind of talk is invariably followed by demands for more spending, tax increases, etc.


23 posted on 06/27/2007 9:22:22 AM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

The expense is going to be mind-boggling. A six-mile stretch of I-10 is being widened from four to eight lanes at Tucson. Three years, $220 Million. And that’s before delays and cost overruns.


42 posted on 06/27/2007 12:02:51 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson