Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/26/2007 5:43:34 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Anti-Hillary

If we do attack Iran, it must be an activity of three parts.

The first is an air war to destroy their nuclear infrastructure. But that is a temporary measure, as they are correct in assuming that they can (and have the will) to rebuild it.

So it must be accompanied by the partitioning of Iran, to deny it the oil revenues it would need to rebuild its nuclear weapons program. This would amount to a minimum of slicing off Iranian Kurdistan and Iranian Arabic Khuzestan, which has most of its oil wealth. This would also have the added bonus of denying Iran easy access to the Persian Gulf, so they could no longer easily menace the world’s oil supply.

In turn, these minimum partitioned regions would require that we reduce the Iranian military and Revolutionary Guard, so that they could not attempt to recapture the lands occupied respectively by the Kurdish Peshmurga army and the Iraqi Army.

Fortunately, almost all of the peoples in these lands would be more than glad to join with the adjacent peoples, with whom they have far more in common than Persians, who treat them as despised minorities and steal their wealth.

By not attacking, or only minimally attacking Persia proper, especially only military targets in Tehran, it might be possible to avoid inflaming the majority of Persians, who would be far less inclined to be slaughtered to defend the hated and corrupt Mullahs that rule over them. Especially considering how their lives were squandered in the Iran-Iraq War.

So the destruction of their nuclear infrastructure and armed forces can mostly be done by air, with a rapid movement of two or three of our ground divisions currently in Iraq to slice off Kurdistan and Khuzestan, followed by the Kurdish Peshmurga and Iraqi Army.

Other variants to the scheme might include the annexation of Iranian Baluchistan in the southeast by the Pakistani Army, which would further deny Iran the rich mineral wealth of that region; and to utterly destroy and use denial weapons on the Iranian uranium mines in their Azeri territories.

But it is vital that we do not just destroy what of their nuclear infrastructure we can, or else in a decade, just like with Iraq, we will have to invade and conquer the whole of Iran, at much higher cost in lives and treasure.


42 posted on 06/26/2007 6:25:48 PM PDT by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary
After the U.S. is a sanctuary country, Bush will preach tolerance to the Iranians who were afforded amnesty. I’m sure none of them would have any negative thoughts about our Country. Look what our close relation to Saudi Arabia did for the attitude of Saudis illegally in our Country.
45 posted on 06/26/2007 6:30:49 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary
Maybe Bush is hard of hearing. It wouldn’t be the first time.
46 posted on 06/26/2007 6:32:03 PM PDT by ChessExpert (President Bush might as well say "Read my lips: It is not an amnesty bill")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary

Mr. Bush doesnt have the time to deal with Iran now. He is too busy giving the country to the Mexicans.


48 posted on 06/26/2007 6:36:12 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (http://www.imwithfred.com/index.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary

Bush is starting to make Lyndon Johnson look like a decent war time President.

Condi Rice is just as weak and misguided as McNamara was.

If they botch this Iran situation, they will be haunted by it forever.


49 posted on 06/26/2007 6:38:16 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (I just became engaged...6/16/07..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary
Bush wasn't going to accept a nuclear NK either, but....
50 posted on 06/26/2007 6:40:31 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary

The things Bush “doesn’t see” are legion.


63 posted on 06/26/2007 6:57:51 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary

sez it all about gw
open borders and no israel


65 posted on 06/26/2007 7:01:39 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary

God bless John Bolton, one of the few we’ve got with brains and guts.


80 posted on 06/26/2007 7:46:45 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Democrats are the Evil Party, Republicans are the Stupid Party - So, "Bipartisan"=Stupid AND Evil!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary

So George W. Bush is an incompetent fool. What else is new? The “Bush Doctrine” lies in ruins over Iran (and Pakistan for that matter). What a disaster of a Presidency.


91 posted on 06/26/2007 9:29:39 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary

bttt


97 posted on 06/27/2007 5:31:29 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Hillary

Bump for later


100 posted on 06/28/2007 6:58:08 AM PDT by schu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson