Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson defends lobbying record
Yahoo News ^ | June 26, 2007 | ERIK SCHELZIG

Posted on 06/26/2007 11:04:12 AM PDT by Politicalmom

NASHVILLE, Tenn. - Fred Thompson, a likely Republican presidential candidate, on Tuesday defended his work as a Washington lobbyist, telling The Associated Press that lobbying is an important part of life because "government's got their hands in everything."

The actor and former U.S. senator from Tennessee added, "Nobody yet has pointed out any of my clients that didn't deserve representation."

Thompson, who likes to cast himself as a political outsider, earned more than $1 million lobbying the federal government for more than 20 years. He lobbied for a savings-and-loan deregulation bill that helped hasten the industry's collapse and a failed nuclear energy project that cost taxpayers more than a billion dollars.

In a brief interview with the AP, Thompson said he expects to hear criticism about his lobbying activities as he moves closer to declaring his candidacy. Opponents emphasized his lobbying work during his Senate races in 1994 and 1996.

"They'll talk about it — probably with the same results," he said.

More than 200 supporters gathered earlier Tuesday at the Nashville airport to greet Thompson. He told the crowd he's "testing the waters" about a run, "but the waters feel pretty warm to me."

Thompson was scheduled to attend a fundraiser in Nashville later in the day.

Thompson declined to give a specific date for an official announcement about a presidential run.

"I have a general time in mind," he said. "You're either running or not running. I think the steps we're taking are pretty obvious."


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; fredthompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2007 11:04:16 AM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jellybean; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; pitbully; granite; ...
PING!!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference

WARNING: If you want to be added to this list, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.

2 posted on 06/26/2007 11:05:26 AM PDT by Politicalmom ("Mom, I'll be old enough to vote for Fred when he runs for his second term." -My Son. (I'm proud))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Thompson, who likes to cast himself as a political outsider, earned more than $1 million lobbying the federal government for more than 20 years. He lobbied for a savings-and-loan deregulation bill that helped hasten the industry's collapse and a failed nuclear energy project that cost taxpayers more than a billion dollars.

I love drive-by's like this. Anyone got the REAL scoop on this?

3 posted on 06/26/2007 11:05:59 AM PDT by The Blitherer (What would a Free Man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

“He lobbied for a savings-and-loan deregulation bill that helped hasten the industry’s collapse and a failed nuclear energy project that cost taxpayers more than a billion dollars.”

A blatant and gross misrepresentation by the author.


4 posted on 06/26/2007 11:07:13 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
earned more than $1 million lobbying the federal government for more than 20 years

Sounds like a lot, but it's $50,000 a year, a pittance compared to what he can earn as a lawyer or actor.

5 posted on 06/26/2007 11:09:05 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer
Anyone got the REAL scoop on this?

The REAL scoop on this is that Yahoo News is a leftist outfit that tells whatever lies it thinks will help the Democrats.

6 posted on 06/26/2007 11:09:13 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer
$1 million over 20 years is an average of $50,000 a year. He either wasn't doing a lot of lobbying or he wasn't very good at it if he only made $50k a year at it. It is very typical for a single client to pay a Lobbyist $50,000 a year. Many lobbying firms charge corporations upwards of $50,000 a MONTH. Top lobbyists generally make well over $1 million a YEAR.

Much ado about nothing.

7 posted on 06/26/2007 11:11:21 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Thanks anyway, Nancy, but we already have a Commander-in-Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer

$1,000,000 divided by 20 years equals
$50,000 per year.
Chicken feed by Washington D.C. standards.


8 posted on 06/26/2007 11:11:43 AM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Excellent answer, Fred.


9 posted on 06/26/2007 11:12:27 AM PDT by RockinRight (Fear the Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

Well, I was actually referring more to the issues he was lobbying about, rather than how much he made.


10 posted on 06/26/2007 11:12:55 AM PDT by The Blitherer (What would a Free Man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer

From Powerline:

The AP highlights three issues on which Thompson lobbied over the course of his career. The first is savings and loan deregulation:

One of his clients at the time was the Tennessee Savings and Loan League, on whose behalf Thompson lobbied for a bill to deregulate the industry. Experts say the final version of that bill played a large role in the savings-and-loan crisis of the late 1980s, opening the door to widespread fraud and mismanagement.
The fiasco ultimately led to about a $150 billion taxpayer bailout of the industry, said Robert Litan, a senior fellow with the Brookings Institution and co-author of a 1993 report on the causes of the disaster that describes the influence of lobbyists as “pervasive, pernicious—and effective.”

This is a good example of how controversial (and often false) liberal claims become “fact” over time. The heavily regulated savings and loan industry couldn’t deal with either the spiraling interest rates or the innovative competition it faced beginning in the late 1970s. The industry had to be deregulated, or it was doomed. As it turned out, much of the industry was doomed anyway, and the government made things worse by encouraging risky lending practices, by enacting the Tax Reform of 1986, which rendered many S&Ls insolvent, and through regulatory mismanagement. No matter: the AP, like the Democrats, suggests that having anything to do with the “savings and loan crisis” was disreputable.

The second target is Thompson’s work on behalf of the Clinch River nuclear power plant:

Thompson’s first and longest-running lobbying client was Westinghouse Electric Co., for whom he lobbied in favor of nuclear energy. In 1981, he received a little less than $54,000 from the company. At the time Westinghouse was receiving federal funds for Tennessee’s Clinch River nuclear project.
A spokesman for Thompson, Mark Corallo, said the experimental reactor “was a local project focused on new kinds of energy at a time when the U.S. was going through an energy crisis.”

The reactor was never built and the project was canceled in 1983 after the government had spent $1.7 billion on it.

Clinch River was to be a breeder reactor, a technology which was widely used in Europe at the time, but not in the U.S. I have no idea whether the project had merit or not; it was far from the only nuclear power project that was never completed. Thompson could plausibly claim to have been ahead of his time on nuclear power, but that isn’t how his representation of Westinghouse will be spun.


11 posted on 06/26/2007 11:13:12 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Does Thompson really cast himself as an outsider? Seems to me it’s more like he says the system is a boondoggle, and he knows it because he has been in it. That isn’t the same as posing as an outsider.


12 posted on 06/26/2007 11:16:09 AM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

>The Tennesee Warhorse - Ready to Ride<

Yeah, but look who’s gonna ride him!


13 posted on 06/26/2007 11:18:01 AM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

I think you’re right on the money. Fred himself has never said “I’m an outsider” rather he has indicated he’s been on both sides and has been in it enough to know just how much of a boondoggle it is. However, since he has worked in the private sector too (granted, as a lawyer), he’s got more credibility.


14 posted on 06/26/2007 11:21:12 AM PDT by RockinRight (Fear the Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

And who is that?


15 posted on 06/26/2007 11:21:26 AM PDT by RockinRight (Fear the Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

The “outsider” desciption is much like the “another Reagan” narratives in origin. They are straw men puposefully erected by the MSM and his opponents just so they can knock em down.


16 posted on 06/26/2007 11:24:04 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Thompson, who likes to cast himself as a political outsider, earned more than $1 million lobbying the federal government for more than 20 years.

Good grief, I have lobbyist friends who make that in a year, and they don't lobby in Washington, they lobby at the state level.

I had a sign in my office for years, as did and do many of my friends, "Don't tell my mother I'm a Lobbyist, she thinks I play piano in a whorehouse." Contrary to the implication of this article, lobbyist is not synonymous with bad, or evil, or corrupt.

17 posted on 06/26/2007 11:25:35 AM PDT by Gabz (My karma ran over your dogma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

I have told you repeatedly not to post to me.

From now on I push abuse.


18 posted on 06/26/2007 11:30:17 AM PDT by Politicalmom ("Mom, I'll be old enough to vote for Fred when he runs for his second term." -My Son. (I'm proud))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
I am currently leaning toward Fred. However, a friend of mine thinks that Fred is no different than the rest of the field. He keeps bringing up the CFR and the Build - A - Burgers. My friend also believes that Fred could choose McCain as a VP if he wins the nomination. He would rather stay at home before he votes for more of the same. Personally, I will need to know much more before I commit to giving him (Fred) my vote.

My friend is a supporter of Ron Paul. Ron has some good ideas, but seems to be a lost cause. What to do? What to do?

19 posted on 06/26/2007 11:37:53 AM PDT by kddid (Hillary Clinton will never be President of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

>The Tennesee Warhorse - Ready to Ride<

Yeah, but look who’s gonna ride him!


The gnats may think they are riding the warhorse, but that don’t make it so.


20 posted on 06/26/2007 11:38:12 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson