Posted on 06/26/2007 8:47:27 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
According to Republican polling and strategy firm The Tarrance Group(1), currently engaged in strategic polling for Rudy Giuliani, 47 house members, 10 senators and 5 governors, - more than 70% of Americans support the current Senate Comprehensive Immigration Reform efforts, referred to by most Americans as amnesty.
Once again, we learn that its all in how you frame the question
When CNN recently asked if we favored or opposed the senate immigration reform bill, 47% said they oppose, 30% favored and 22% remained unsure, proving mostly that CNN viewers just arent that bright. (Just kidding but 22% unsure?)
The point is, - the Tarrance Group poll must have asked questions that no other polling firm asked in order to come up with the answers they are reporting to your senate Republicans.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbyus.com ...
Which means 90% of all senators...
I read all the comments on this thread and ran my own poll...
100% oppose amnesty, our current government and their polling agencies!
If this is the group who called me a week and a half ago then I know they got an earfull from me puctuated by a clear “NO Amnesty, not now, not ever”
How slippery.
If you define America as “North, Central, and South America” that number may be correct.
Just say NO to Illegal Alien Amnesty!! Keep calling!! Its NOT OVER!!
U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121
U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121
White House comments: (202) 456-1111
Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep
Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Good array of graphics devolve!
The Omnibus Amnesty bill proposes that we keep just about all of them.
Oh oh, you just wrote a dirty word..you said “Amnesty”.. you’re going to get it now! :-O
Blatant lie. Period.
Maybe you should try reading the column, then I won’t need to...
Now that seems perfectly sensible to me. I don’t know why more people don’t see that! They just don’t want to look at it, and see if there are things in that bill that have any merit. But you have some good points that I can agree with in that list.
The headline, sure. The column, no!
If a survey were done similarly on abortion, without calling it abortion, but instead, say “womens rights”, who wouldn’t be for “womens rights”...?
Oh, sorry! That’s already been done...
What if instead of asking, “do you support womens right”, we asked, “do you support killing defenseless babies?”...
Oh, sorry, unfair...
Let me think for a minute......
ALL .....
BREAKING ON AMNESTY -—
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate on Tuesday voted to revive a stalled immigration overhaul backed by President George W. Bush that would offer a path to citizenship to millions of illegal immigrants.
The Senate voted 64-35 to resume debate on the bill, which ties tough border security and workplace enforcement measures to a plan to legalize an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants and a create temporary worker program sought by business groups.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/6/26/124122.shtml?s=al&promo_code=3635-1
Yep.
.
Thanks potlatch!
I cropped 30 pixels from both sides of the CNN poll and resized it back up to 980 width but now 529 height
Then increase sharpness/contrast and cut colors from a dumb 256 (for a graph!) to about 35 and made BG pure #FFFFFF white
That cut filesize on a .jpg version in half
- That gets the text size bigger and clearer and much easier to read
—
Teddy Kennedy was singing in Spanish on a Mexican/La Raza radio station in California yesterday
I used “El Paso” as the linked .wav
Did not locate the vocal version of “(Nuevo) Laredo”
You did a lot of work cutting file size and I didn’t notice the difference. It looks good.
Looked in my files but don’t have the streets of Laredo either. Kenny Rodgers I think??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.