Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secularist Europe Silences Pro-Lifers and Creationists
Brussels Journal ^ | 6/23/07 | Paul Belien

Posted on 06/25/2007 12:39:01 PM PDT by ZGuy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: ZGuy

bump


21 posted on 06/25/2007 1:34:03 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Thus come the islamists.


22 posted on 06/25/2007 1:44:12 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA

Can Nicoli Carpathia be very for behind?


23 posted on 06/25/2007 1:46:55 PM PDT by Rodm (Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

From whence the angst and fear of a Theocracy? If America had wanted a Theocracy they missed the best chance at it in 1778 or thereabouts. We had roughly 200 years to establish a Theocracy in this “Christian” nation and it didn’t happen. What in the world brings liberals to such fears of something that will never happen because of Christians?


24 posted on 06/25/2007 1:48:08 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
It is not like the German people haven’t been down this path before. What we need next is a reason to militarize the country by a popular leader and hi-ho its off to another war and genocide we go.

(How long will it also be before some secular forces in Europe try to find a way, maybe through some type of international crime treaty, to silence pro-life Christians in the US. The Left cannot stand criticism or even to allow an alternative voice. When the left starts to get in its full power-stride, it will do all it can to silence every non-approved voice.)

25 posted on 06/25/2007 1:48:49 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodm

“Can Nicoli Carpathia be very for behind?”

You forced me to educate myself a bit.
I’m afraid I’m behind on the “Left Behind” series, but did track down
the character (and the fellow that portrayed him).

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0192963/

(So much for the “Bible Belt” folks being monolithic; I attended a
very conservative/fundamentalist college and haven’t read any of
the “Left Behind” books!)


26 posted on 06/25/2007 1:55:14 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

this is sickening...
the lutheran guy proves more than what he claimed; that is the german legal system is a buch of neo-nazis in that they squash free speech to promote their new holocaust!!

i’m in that country right now, i hope I don’t get arrested for saying this! but it sickens me.


27 posted on 06/25/2007 1:56:09 PM PDT by rogernz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornelis
Thanks for the ping.

Guess it's time for me to shuffle off this vale of tears. This is where I came in back in '36.

28 posted on 06/25/2007 2:33:13 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marsh_of_mists
any of these European countries

Pleaase don't paint all Europeans with the same brush. Poland is in battle right now with the EUros over similar issues.
29 posted on 06/25/2007 3:23:10 PM PDT by caveat emptor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

The Pastor is a political prisoner. Time to start trashing the German scum as the fascist thugs that they are.

I’m sure the New York Times and ABC will cover this and condemn it for the next 10 weeks.


30 posted on 06/25/2007 3:54:42 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Today creationist theories are tending to find their way into Europe and their spread is affecting quite a few Council of Europe member states. […]

What this means is that evangelicals are making inroads in Europe and the Euro elite don't like it one little bit. A certain percentage of evangelicals will go the young earth route. Those are who we are seeting in this article. But behind them, are almost certainly a lot more evangelicals. They will be persecuted for their faith in Jesus; not for their belief in one interpretation of Genesis.

31 posted on 06/25/2007 4:43:42 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

More evidence of the thriving spirit of Antichrist alive and well in the world today.


32 posted on 06/25/2007 4:44:29 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Darwinism imposed by law.

But don't you know that "error has no rights?"

Hey, just because our lives have no ultimate meaning doesn't mean we still don't "need" to know the truth of how things work to navigate through this world! [/sarcasm]

33 posted on 06/25/2007 4:47:13 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator ("Mah tovu 'ohaleykha, Ya`aqov, mishkenoteykha, Yisra'el!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger; SirLinksalot; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Stultis; js1138; narby; Coyoteman; ...

Just wondering if our members from the Church of Darwin are for or against this turn of events brought to us by the socialist EU collective.


34 posted on 06/25/2007 6:25:22 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

“What this means is that evangelicals are making inroads in Europe and the Euro elite don’t like it one little bit. A certain percentage of evangelicals will go the young earth route. Those are who we are seeing in this article. But behind them, are almost certainly a lot more evangelicals. ..” ~ ModelBreaker

And throughout their “report” those “elites” betray the fact that they are well aware of the real reason why they’re getting so much heat from the religious community.

I am providing some of the telling excerpts below:

Doc. 11297 - 8 June 2007
The dangers of creationism in education http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc07/EDOC11297.htm

Report
Committee on Culture, Science and Education
Rapporteur: Mr Guy LENGAGNE, France, Socialist Group

[...]
100. At the same time, it is necessary to consider the causes of such a challenge to the theory of evolution. This theory leaves itself open to many attacks but that could perhaps be explained by the poor way in which it is taught, especially from the epistemological point of view.

101. These reflections lead us to conclude that better teaching or the more appropriate teaching of the sciences and evolution might enable the dissemination of alternative pseudo-theories such as those of the creationists to be combated effectively. It is necessary to avoid doubt entering individuals minds with regard to fundamental scientific knowledge. This importance of quality science teaching that is better suited to the realities of daily life was highlighted in the report on students’ declining interest in scientific studies. ..”

[...]

The position of the Vatican and the Christian religious movements

75. For a long time, the Catholic Church was opposed to transformism and then to evolutionism. However, this opposition has to be understood in the context of the more general mistrust of science prevailing at the time, given the international climate of socialism, which it saw as a consequence of evolutionism. Thus, for a long time there were clashes between the positivist revolutionaries and the Catholics who supported the restoration of the monarchy. The Catholic Church has clearly demonstrated for a very long time that it is creationist. After the Second Vatican Council the Catholic Church was more discreet and almost remained aloof on this issue. This was until 1996, when, on 23 October, Pope John-Paul II recognised that Darwin’s theories were “more than a hypothesis”. ...

76. In the tradition of his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI now welcomes the role of the sciences in the evolution of humanity: ...In early September 2006, he brought together a group of former students and colleagues at Castel Gondolfo for a seminar on the evolutionism versus creationism debate. He published the conclusions of this seminar in mid-April 2007 in German under the title “Schöpfung und Evolution” (Creation and Evolution). ... The Pope rejects ..the theory of evolution, which hides its own weaknesses and does not want to see the questions that arise beyond the methodological capacities of science. The theory of evolution is considered too pervasive by the Catholic Church, which seems above all to be worried about the influence of social Darwinism and the evolutionist theories concerning economic matters and medical ethics. ..”

[...] End excerpts.

Note what a misleading statement this is: “...This was until 1996, when, on 23 October, Pope John-Paul II recognised that Darwin’s theories were “more than a hypothesis”.

In reality, this is precisely what the pope said:

“...What is the significance of such a theory? To address this question is to enter the field of epistemology.

A theory is a metascientific elaboration distinct from the results of observation, but consistent with them. By means of it a series of independent data and facts can be related and interpreted in a unified explanation. A theory’s validity depends on whether or not it can be verified; it is constantly tested against the facts; wherever it can no longer explain the latter, it shows its limitations and unsuitability. It must then be rethought.

Furthermore, while the formulation of a theory like that of evolution complies with the need for consistency with the observed data, it borrows certain notions from natural philosophy.

And, to tell the truth, rather than the theory of evolution, we should speak of several theories of evolution.

On the one hand, this plurality has to do with the different explanations advanced for the mechanism of evolution, and on the other, with the various philosophies on which it is based. Hence the existence of materialist, reductionist, and spiritualist interpretations. What is to be decided here is the true role of philosophy and, beyond it, of theology.

Consequently, theories of evolution which, in accordance with the philosophies inspiring them, consider the spirit as emerging from the forces of living matter or as a mere epiphenomenon of this matter are incompatible with the truth about man. Nor are they able to ground the dignity of the person. ...”

Excerpted from:

Theories of Evolution http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft9703/articles/johnpaul.html

John Paul II

Copyright (c) 1997 First Things 71 (March 1997): 28-29.
Address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, October 22, 1996. bttt


35 posted on 06/25/2007 6:26:59 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (A better name for the goracle is "MALgore" - as in MALpractice, MALevolent, MALfeasance, MALodorous,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
"Church of Darwin?" Darwin was a scientist, to be STUDIED not worshipped.

Many of us don't need a fairytale to base our lives on, nor would ever think of turning to mythology to explain the natural world.

36 posted on 06/25/2007 6:27:35 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
==Many of us don’t need a fairytale to base our lives on, nor would ever think of turning to mythology to explain the natural world.

Then stop worshiping at the neo-pagan alter of the Church of Darwin. Not only do Darwinists believe a fairytale, they are now busy trying to install it as an official state sanctioned religion, complete with all the enforcement mechanisms one would expect from totalitarian minded materialists.

37 posted on 06/25/2007 6:34:25 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I hate what the Europeans are doing as much as you. I am particularly saddened to hear what happenned to that Pastor in Germany mentioned in the article.


38 posted on 06/25/2007 6:35:49 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Then stop worshiping at the neo-pagan alter of the Church of Darwin. Not only do Darwinists believe a fairytale, they are now busy trying to install it as an official state sanctioned religion, complete with all the enforcement mechanisms one would expect from totalitarian minded materialists.

At least six lies on two sentences! Are you trying for a new record?

39 posted on 06/25/2007 6:36:07 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

==At least six lies on two sentences! Are you trying for a new record?

No, I would never think of trying to top you.


40 posted on 06/25/2007 6:37:35 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson