Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wiz
He says his 54 LED fixtures together use less electricity than a single 100-watt incandescent and account for just $2 a month on his utility bill.

If he heats with electricity this saves him no money on his electrical bill during the heating season, which is much of the year in MA. The "wasted" energy of the "less-efficient" incandescent or fluourescent bulbs is in the form of heat, which when using LEDs must be replaced by the furnace.

OTOH, the LEDs lack of waste heat saves on cooling costs as well as lighting costs during the summer.

10 posted on 06/25/2007 3:48:05 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Diversity in theory is the enemy of diversity in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

He heats with gas, and it costs much more to cool a home than to heat it. Also, heat from lights which are typically mounted high don’t do much for the overall heating system unless there are ceiling fans to bring the warm air down from the ceiling.


41 posted on 07/10/2007 7:42:24 AM PDT by kingjoeyjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
I heat my basement with 4 big computers and some networking gear. I used the same approach during a 3 month period in a San Diego apartment, but only 2 computers did the job fine.

Our local Home Depot and Lowe's have a few LED fixtures for sale. We use them in a few places where light is useful, but not critical. Reading lights are much better as incandescent or halogen. An LED is fine for stumbling down a hallway or in a bathroom.

47 posted on 09/18/2007 10:49:24 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson