Al Gore: Part of the Same Culture He Loathes

BC Politics ^ | June 21, 2007 | Mark Edward Manning

[2ndDivisionVet]

Recently, The Sun — hardly the most erudite or sophisticated of Britain's newspapers, I grant you — published a feature article entitled "Why is TV more keen on Paris Hilton than on saving the planet?" Actually, it's not so much an article as a write-up of an interview with none other than Al Gore.

"Al Gore is a man on a mission to save the planet — and is enraged that everyone else seems more interested in saving Paris Hilton," writes reporter Victoria Newton, who had a talk with the former Vice President.

Now, I'm a little tired of Gore's schtick. He is incapable of even trying to consider that there may be perfectly natural forces contributing to climate change, ones that mankind is powerless to act against. "He believes we have just ten years to begin saving the planet before it is too late," writes Newton. I wonder if Gore has considered a resolution to stop solar flares? Only ten years left, worth a shot! Let's all hope China and India will agree to that because they're certainly not about to reduce their carbon footprint anytime soon.

If Gore is really the environmentalist that he cracks himself up to be, why does he constantly harp on solely about global warming? Why does he never attack manufacturers and distributors alike over wasteful packaging? When was the last time you heard Gore even mention recycling? Why, if the environment is his biggest concern, does he never criticize unchecked mass immigration, encouraging more development and more energy usage such as it does? Can you, even in your wildest dreams, imagine Al Gore encouraging population control? Far too politically incorrect, better leave it off the agenda, even if that would prove to be the most environmentally friendly act of all.

Alas, global warming is scary stuff. And power-hungry people love to spook an electorate that cannot think for themselves.

But, you see, that is the very problem. No-one thinks about the big issues. Look at how the media treated the recent G8 conference in Germany as some rock-star event to make it palatable to the average Joe or Jane, because that's all these schmucks understand. Politics must be groovy or else people turn off and live vicariously through celebrities like Paris Hilton because their own lives are so vacuous and their heads so empty. Better to pretend that George Bush, Tony Blair, Vladimir Putin, Nicolas Sarkozy, et al are performers at Live 8 rather than world leaders discussing agendas as the G8.

Immigration bill? Who cares. Global warming? We'll talk about that later. War on Terror? We've got better things to think about. We just want to see Barry Bonds hit another home run, we want to listen to the latest Nelly Furtado album, we want to read about David and Victoria Beckham's adjustment to life in L.A., we want to watch Survivor, The Apprentice, Big Brother or whatever noxious reality-TV show floats our boat, we want to eat KFC and drink Pepsi and pretend that it's good for us (and subsequently blame our 300-pound butts on anyone but ourselves), we want to pray for poor little Britney Spears and most of all, we've got to rescue Paris Hilton from the indignity of jail. These are the things that matter most to your average person. Sad, but true.

So, Mr. Gore, I very much share your frustration with the fairy-tale priorities that the majority of people seem to have. You're well within your rights to be enraged over that. People daydream between the pages of OK! and People far too much and that is a big reason why the world may never change for the better. I don't blame you one bit for hating the reality of this thoughtless, sound bite-addicted, fast-food culture.

But please also realize that the doomsday scenario that you're peddling us might be a fairy tale too. You may very well find that you yourself have become part of this lazy "culture" who'll vote for the Greens if you say it's hip but are too busy stuffing their faces with "food" in polystyrene take-out containers to care what it all really means.

[Tax-chick]

All day, all night.

[RobinOfKingston]

We are the villains here, not Paris

She is the victim of our schoolyard capriciousness

I mostly agree with your statement here. While, individually, most people are generally decent, and not capable of (or perhaps not intent upon) destroying the lives of others, collectively, we are quite a different story.

[T Lady]

I did not make these statements...did you read my post?!

Check it again. Thank you.

[ripley]

me too.

[Tax-chick]

Obviously you’re a person of Sense!

[ripley]

yes, but sometimes nonsense.

[RipSawyer]

I am pleased to say that I care more about Paris Hilton than about Global Warming.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If Paris Hilton’s globes were more impressive there would be more volunteers to warm them! But not I among them, I am pleased to say I care not a fig about Hilton or Global Warming.

[FrankR]

Actually, instead of worrying so much about algore and his global warming schtick, we should just use it to solve the immigration problem...here's how it goes:

13-million illegal immigrants now, more than 150 million forcasted. Let's split the difference and say we level off at about 50-million. That's at least 25-million new automobiles on the road, because with all their new jobs, they'll have the means to purchase them.



So - based on the b/s that algore spouts regularly, that will be 25-million MORE cars contributing to his beloved "global warning".

MORAL: Illegal immigrants will contribute significantly to global warning, and therefore the immigration will should be killed dead, and buried forever.

But that begs another question: It has been reported that China is now the leading contibutor to air pollution...so then why isn't algore touring all those countries who are not regulated, and selling them on the idea...after all, he did say 'GLOBAL' warming, didn't he?

Maybe he's just trying to bring down the U.S.

[Tax-chick]

LOL!