(Michael Crabtree/The Times)
Posted on 06/23/2007 10:45:25 AM PDT by wagglebee
(Michael Crabtree/The Times)
Lydia Playfoot, who says her school is discriminating against her for banning her from wearing a purity ring
(Michael Crabtree/The Times)
The ring that Millais School banned Lydia Playfoot from wearing
A teenage girl who was banned by her school from wearing a "purity ring" is taking her case to the High Court today.
Lydia Playfoot, 16, is a member of a Christian group called the Silver Ring Thing and one of a number of students at the Millais School in Horsham, West Sussex, who wears a silver ring engraved with a Biblical reference — "1 Thes 434", a reference to St Paul's Letter to the Thessalonians — as a sign of their belief in abstinence from sex until marriage.
She claims that her secondary school is breaching her human rights by preventing her from wearing the ring, while allowing Muslim and Sikh students to wear headscarfs and religious bangles.
The school denies her claims, arguing that the purity ring is not an integral part of the Christian faith, and contravenes its uniform policy.
Miss Playfoot will argue that her right to express her religious beliefs under Article Nine of the Human Rights Act has been breached by the ban.
"At my school Muslims are allowed to wear headscarves and other faiths can wear bangles and other types of jewellery and it feels like Christians are being discriminated against," Miss Playfoot told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
The Silver Ring Thing was set up in America in 1996 as a response to the escalating numbers of teen pregnancies in Yuma, Arizona. Teenagers pay a few dollars for a silver ring and a Bible, and pledge not to have sex before marriage. The movement arrived in Britain several years ago.
The UK branch of the Silver Ring Thing is based at the Kings Church in Horsham where Ms Playfoot's father, Phil, is pastor. Her mother, Heather, is the company secretary of its business arm. It runs a training programme called "The Silver Ring Thing 434".
Ms Playfoot denied that wearing her silver chastity ring was a fad. "The idea is a bit American, but it's something I think is just really important. It's not just a fad sweeping across England, it is something unique, important to every single person," she told BBC Breakfast.
"It says that I’m not going to have sex until I’m married and I’m going to stay sexually pure until I’m married. In the Bible it says you should remain sexually pure and I think this is a way I want to express my faith.
"I think in the society we live in today with lots of pregnancies and STDs, something like this is quite important and should be taken hold of."
In a statement placed before the court, she said: “We are involved with SRT (Silver Ring Thing) as a movement to promote and educate young people on the issues of sexual purity”.
Her father, Phil Playfoot, said that his daughter was pursuing the case, even though she was leaving the Millais school, because it embodied an important principle.
Rings had been worn by Christians for many hundreds of years and Lydia wore hers as a symbol of her commitment to her faith, he said. Many thousands of young people had made the same commitment.
He claimed that Christianity was under attack from the forces of secularism: "I think what is happening in our culture more generally is that what I would describe as secular fundamentalism is coming to the fore, which really wants to silence certain beliefs and Christian views in particular. I think an important principle is at stake here, I think Christians should be respected for their views and beliefs.
"As other faiths are allowed to express their views through the wearing of headscarfs or the Kara bracelet of a Sikh, I think Lydia should be able to wear a ring as an expression of her faith," he told the BBC.
Mr Playfoot said that he had not put any pressure on his daughter to bring the court case. He claimed that his involvement with the Silver Ring Thing had happened after Lydia was banned from wearing the ring at school.
"Lydia is a free thinker, she is a young person in her own right," he told the BBC. "She’s not living out our beliefs or wishes, it’s something she wants to do for herself."
Stacey Wilkinson, administrator of the Silver Ring Thing UK, said: "We are supporting Lydia but can't comment on the case itself.
"The Silver Ring Thing is mainly in youth groups. We are trying to get into schools but it's a lot harder because of the Christian background that the course includes. We don't talk about contraception at all because it's about abstinence. In some cases we are going against what the government has said, but we want to give people a second option.
"Some people take the course but don't make the pledge, but it's a good thing that they've heard the options. It gives them the option to say no."
It is not the first time students have faced school bans over Christian symbols. Earlier this year Samantha Devine, a 13-year-old Catholic schoolgirl, was told not to wear a crucifix on a chain because it breached health and safety rules at The Robert Napier School, a non-denominational mixed school in Gillingham, Kent.
The school said the only exception it would make to its uniform rule would be if the jewellery was an essential part of a particular religion, which they did not feel was the case for Miss Devine. She was free to wear a crucifix as a small lapel badge, but not on a chain, the school ruled.
In 2005, 16-year-old Sam Morris was excluded from Sinfin Community School in Derby for a day after refusing to remove her cross and chain to comply with the school’s jewellery ban.
In November Nadia Eweida lost her legal battle to wear a crucifix while working as an air stewardess, but publicity over the case forced British Airways to review its uniform policy and allow religious symbols to be worn, although only in the form of small lapel badges.
The left will do ANYTHING to silence talk of teen abstinence.
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
This should not surprise anyone who’s read the Bible. This world was long ago handed over to Lucifer via disobedience.
Do they ban the wearing of all rings?
This is true.
and contravenes its uniform policy.
That must be one heck of a comprehensive uniform policy! Even the military doesn't have rules against wearing a ring, unless there's a safety issue.
Had it been hanging from her nose the school wouldn’t have even noticed.
It's obviously not a uniform policy if headscarves are allowed but this little ring is not.
Liberal idiots.
Unless the school has a policy banning ALL rings, I don’t see how they can keep the girl from wearing hers.
“That must be one heck of a comprehensive uniform policy! Even the military doesn’t have rules against wearing a ring, unless there’s a safety issue.”
I went to a Catholic girls’ school from kindergarten through grade 12, and of course everyone wore a uniform. We couldn’t wear makeup or have elaborate hairdos, but modest jewelery was accepted. Even the nuns weren’t THAT strict.
It seems to me that, if they were truly after “uniformity,” they’d have to put all the girls in long dresses with long sleeves, in order to satisfy the Moslems.
That the Brits have lost their minds is beyond question. However, what is in question is will they ever get them back.
The last time the story surfaced that was brought up because teachers wore wedding rings.
This is true.
Well I guess if the schools in the U.K. are the arbiters of Christianity it could be true. On the other hand if Christians are a nation of priests and each is answerable to god, then it isn't.
Tell me - some denominations hold that song without accompaniment is integral to Christianity, others that musicians as in Solomon's temple are what God desires. Have schools in the U.K. been given the authority to settle that for us? What did they decide? And are we to have wine with communion, Or must demon rum never pass our lips? Oh where is a headmaster when you need one?
and contravenes its uniform policy.
That must be one heck of a comprehensive uniform policy! Even the military doesn't have rules against wearing a ring, unless there's a safety issue.
Any idea which is wrong if carried to its logical conclusion, is wrong in its inception.
Colorful.
That’s what I wanted to know. I’m betting they don’t!
She’s got nice teeth for a Brit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.