So he flipped on abortion. Good. He did not flip on gays or anything else alleged. There is no "there" there even if people want to say it over and over again if you research his actual record. Just because his enemies or competitors think it is a clever tag to pin on him due to his switch on abortion, it doesn't mean that it carries any validity. Just like the tag of lazy they want to pin on Fred. Easy to say, but what is the truth?
Who hasn't made any flip flops should throw the first stone, I guess.
-McCain flip-flopped on tax cuts, immigration, stem cells.
-Rudy flipped on PBA, Hyde Amendment.
-Fred flipped on abortion, immigration, CFR etc and so forth.
And, for the dems, well, we all know that Hillary was for the war before she was against it, among other things.
Changing or evolving positions is what politicians do. If they have a good reason for it and they flip in our direction then I can't fault them too much for that. Looks like McCain was the only one flipping in the wrong direction most of the time.
You keep going with that holier than thou stuff though.
redgirlinabluestate wrote: “Nice soundbites, but where’s the beef? It’s a false argument made by RINOS and liberals against Mitt since there is nothing else to attack him on”
Rich Lowry is hardly a RINO or a liberal. Same goes for the editors of Human Events, one of th most conservative publications there is.
Human Events called Mitt not just a RINO, but one of the worst 10 RINOs in 1985. Now, less than two years later, Romney is trying to make us believe that he’s a committed conservative. In reality, he’s a chameleon
Sorry, I’m not buyin’ that particular snake oil, and from the looks of things, neither are a whole lot of other conservatives.
Mitt’s had his time in the sun. Now, like Giuliani and John, he’s going down. Conservatives are discovering that they don’t have to settle for Rudy McRomney!