[Frwy]

And that, my friend, is good ole American Justice. NOT! It stinks like all of the cr@p that runs through the courts at all levels.

[Hegemony Cricket]

The law is a ass

[Right Wing Assault]

How about if they find the actual father, he reimburses the guy as well as pays child support?

[spacewarp]

Why can’t he sue the “real” sperm donor....ummm...father for back support?

Paul.

[joebuck]

Why couldn’t he sue mom for common law fraud and use the support paid as the proper measure of damages (along with every other dime he ever shelled out)?

[Wolfie]

Sue da bitch.

[darkwing104]

In this case I would rule the Court and the Department of Child Support Services just volunteered to pay all damages. After all they don't want the child to suffer on the account of the mother's fraudulent claims.

[Lijahsbubbe]

Not that it’s his fault, but I wonder why he waited so long to do a DNA test.

The whole child support system stinks.

[HitmanLV]

Works for me.

[OB1kNOb]

Sue the woman for theft by fraudulent means.

[exit82]

Put a lien on the beeyatch’s house.

[jjw]

I think the best question is:

Why can’t states pass laws that say that parents are not responsible for child support for children that can be proven through DNA to be not theirs, regardless of time limits.

[lowbridge]

bump

[AnotherUnixGeek]

State laws do not allow Taron James to demand repayment of the money he supplied before a DNA test confirmed that the child of a former girlfriend was someone else's, the state 2nd District Court of Appeal said in a ruling published Tuesday.

Why is this ruling not in violation of the 13th amendment to the Constitution?

[Logophile]

The mother later sought child support and in 1996 Los Angeles County forced James to begin paying $121 a month to its child support unit. A DNA test in 2001 proved that he was not the father and he was allowed to stop making payments.

Look at the bright side: Apparently it does not cost much to raise a child in Los Angeles.

[Leftism is Mentally Deranged]

Of course. Those laws were passed to please man-hating feminazis, not to achieve justice. The left doesn’t care, as long as it’s some MAN who pays.

[lesser_satan]

I'd appeal, and offer her a ride to the courthouse...
...with these guys:

[TheSpottedOwl]

Oh that’s just BS!

Further proof that the law is against the average citizen.

[kjhm]

Did you know that your state gets incentive money from the federal government for collecting child support? Your taxes as work. Did you know that the federal government pays states over 66% of the costs of a state to collect child support? Your tax dollars as work. Did you know that the Office of Child Support Enforcement has more employees than the FBI? Did you know that almost 10 Billion dollars of your tax money is spent each year to collect child support?
Did you know that most non custoidal parents are not allowed to pay child support directly to the custodial parent? If the ncp was allowed to pay direcly to the cp then the state would not be able to collect thoes lovely tax dollars as incentives. So it looks as if every taxpayer in this country contributes to child support in some way.

[goldstategop]

Of course the money should be paid back. Its legalized theft of someone's life. And it should be returned with interest due. In full.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus