To: rabscuttle385; Defiant; PeterPrinciple; KittyKares; freekitty; Rockitz; Sonny M; Altura Ct.
One of the odd things is that I don’t see Ron Paul’s name on the cosponsor list. That’s weird; I know he prefers just going straight for amending the 14th (though the current position on illegals and anchor babies is due to misreading of the amendment’s intent than anything else), but cosponsoring these bills wouldn’t have hurt.
14 posted on
06/22/2007 9:24:04 AM PDT by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
No offense meant, but I don't care what Ron Paul does. He is a weird guy, and in spite of a loyal following, he is a 4th tier player in national politics. In fact, he hurts a cause by supporting it.
I've been following Ron Paul since 1982, when I used to read his daily insertions into the Congressional Record. Yes, I was that big a geek. Some of his positions were outstanding; others were lunacy. The loony ones have marginalized him.
38 posted on
06/22/2007 9:45:42 AM PDT by
Defiant
(W '04...........Cheney '07, Thompson/Hunter '08.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
That will leave a mark!
:)
114 posted on
06/22/2007 10:30:49 AM PDT by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
IIRC, Ron Paul has offered his own bill to end anchor babies for several years now. He should get together with Tancredo and Hunter (or vice versa) and push one bill.
204 posted on
06/22/2007 11:24:51 PM PDT by
Iwo Jima
("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson