Posted on 06/22/2007 5:48:28 AM PDT by indcons
Yesterday, a GOP aide, who is one of my sources in the Senate, gave me the rundown on what's currently happening with the Senate immigration bill (You can see my two previous reports from this source here and here).
To begin with, the key thing to keep in mind about the upcoming vote on the Senate immigration bill is that the pro-amnesty forces have two key cloture votes that they have to win.
The first is the vote on the so-called "clay pigeon" strategy. What this does is take the original bill and all of its amendments and reintroduce it on the Senate floor as a new bill. There are two reasons for doing this. The first is to prevent killer amendments that could upset the "grand compromise" from being voted on. The second reason is procedural, because it keeps conservative Senators who are opposed to the bill from being able to slow up the process.
However, in order for the bill and the previous amendments to be offered on the floor of the Senate as a new bill, it will take the cooperation of both Democratic and Republican leadership, along with 60 votes for cloture.
The conventional wisdom has been that this first cloture vote is a done deal because the Senate leadership has been wheeling and dealing behind the scenes. The way it works is that they go to a Senator and offer to allow a vote on their Amendment IF -- and only if -- that Senator agrees to vote for cloture on the "clay pigeon" strategy.
My source tells me that this has left a sour taste in the mouth of a number of Republican Senators who are upset that Mitch McConnell is cooperating with Harry Reid to curtail the rights of Republican Senators. Moreover, there's a growing fear that a dangerous precedent is being set here that could be used against Republican Senators again and again as long as they're in the minority. After all, if the "clay pigeon" strategy is used against conservatives on the immigration issue, who's to say it won't also be used against them on any number of issues in the future? According to my source, this is causing a lot of nervousness amongst Republican Senators and it has Mitch McConnell acting very defensive behind closed doors about working with Harry Reid to roll members of his own caucus. Because of this issue, my source tells me that the vote for the "clay pigeon" strategy is no longer a slam dunk and it is possible that the "grand bargainers" may not be able to get 60 votes to put the bill on the floor as a new bill. If that turns out to be the case, the bill is dead.
Then, if the bill does make it to the floor, there will be 22 amendments offered. These amendments have been carefully selected by the combined Democratic/Republican leadership to try to make sure that no deal breakers can make it through. Still, my source tells me that every amendment has the potential to be problematic for the grand bargainers, because the vote count is very close. If certain amendments pass, it could cost votes. On the other hand, some Senators may very well decide not to vote for the bill if their amendments don't pass. But, once the votes on the amendments are through, there will be another key vote for cloture and whether it will get the 60 votes is anyone's guess at this point.
Then, of course, if they do get the 60 votes for cloture, there will be a final vote for the bill, but since only 50 votes are needed, it will be almost guaranteed to pass.
Summary: My source tells me that he thought the amnesty proponents definitely had the upper hand last week, but now, he thinks the momentum may be swinging back the other way. He also said that he thinks the best chance to stop the bill will be on the initial cloture vote. He said that he's hoping that a coalition of conservatives who think this is a bad bill, liberals who think this bill is too tough, and Republican Senators worried about losing minority rights because of the "clay pigeon" strategy will get together and block the bill. If that doesn't happen, the pro-amnesty side won't have won, but the odds will shift a bit more in their favor.
PS #1: I pointed out that John Edwards and Claire McCaskill have made some extremely negative comments about the bill and asked my source if it's possible that Democratic opposition could increase enough to kill the bill. He said it was possible, but he thought Harry Reid was capable of strong arming the Democrats enough to keep them from losing many votes. Of course, he also added that he's not sure that Harry Reid really wants to see this bill pass, so he's not sure how hard he would fight for it. Either way, he said not to count on the Democrats to finish off the bill.
PS #2: I asked him about Johnny Isakson and Saxby Chambliss announcing that they will vote against cloture. My source's take was that it wasn't a bill killer, but that it was significant since both of them were prominent early supporters of the bill. He added that he thought their switch was indicative of the pressure Republicans are feeling at the grass roots level and he said that he thought Isakson and Chambliss deserved credit for paying attention to it while a lot of pro-amnesty supporters have tuned it out or even shut off their answering machines because they're tired of hearing their constituents complain about this issue.
PS #3: Last but not least, I talked to my source about the shots Trent Lott and Lindsey Graham have taken at people opposed to the bill. My source replied that when this whole thing started, these guys were cocky and thought they'd get this bill through with 70 votes, no problem. But now, because of the blogs and talk radio, they've lost the public debate on the issue and they know it. So, at this point, they're way out on a limb supporting a wildly unpopular bill that may or may not pass, and they're lashing out in frustration. He added that a lot of Republican Senators have been offended and embarrassed by their comments and are worried that the voters will lump them in with Graham and Lott.
From the article: “He added that a lot of Republican Senators have been offended and embarrassed by their comments and are worried that the voters will lump them in with Graham and Lott.”
You bet we will! Any Republican who votes with Graham and Lott will not be re-elected when the time comes! And they better be thinking about that!
PS #3: Last but not least, I talked to my source about the shots Trent Lott and Lindsey Graham have taken at people opposed to the bill. My source replied that when this whole thing started, these guys were cocky and thought they'd get this bill through with 70 votes, no problem. But now, because of the blogs and talk radio, they've lost the public debate on the issue and they know it.
Access to 5:50 min video, here (Graham says it at ~5:46):
ping!
ping
Then those Senators should stand up and speak. Denouncing Graham and Lott would be a good start. Announcing that they are transferring some of their reelection fund to any viable conservative primary challenger for Graham and Lott would be another.
If that miracle ever came to pass, not only would we get back the Senate we deserve, but it would also deal a blow to the imperial Federal government.
You’re so right. I also admired Graham for the way he defended Judicial appointments.
...Too bad about Graham.
I sure hate these people.
On the surface, it would seem the position of the grand bargainers is pretty weak. Why would a Republican vote for cloture to bring the bill back to the floor on a promise their amendment would be included when they could vote no on cloture and kill the bill? The only reason to take the bride is if there aren’t 41 no votes for cloture. Sure seem the minority has the power hear if they will implement it.
Can’t believe I watched all that tripe, but,
Low-lights: “I want to be able to say some day, we did some good’.” Clinton said the same thing his last day in the WH.
He thanked McCain and Kennedy. That’s Juan and Teddy. He thanked them.
He knows a hispanic, Dan Garza, from the Air Force and he’s just swell: “You could eat off his uniform.”
And: “We’re going to tell the bigots to shut up.”
I guess you know Senator Graham, that this means war.
Disgusting, isn't he???
I believe part of Graham’s problem is that he suffers from a fairly bad case of White Guilt. Its always a much uglier affliction in Republicans/conservatives because of how it makes them act towards fellow Republicans/conservatives who don’t suffer from it.
I wonder if he shudders when he sees McCaniac's numbers, and Pandsey's hopes of a plum assignment in that adminstration [can you spell V-i-c-e--P-r-e-s-i-d-e-n-t] exploding away?
Lindsey Ping
"Republican by day, Democrat by night."
Oh, sure, that's it. We'll all vote Democrat because we know they'll be better on the issues than the evil Republicans.
Republicans are stupid. They could have made it a silver lining by proposing a "clean" bill which is only border security, period. It would put them on record with the majority of the country, and would have put the dems on complete defense.
lol! good one.
"Trounced " is losing by 5 points in the popular vote.. Waske up and smell the arsenic, granny.
Are you stumping for Democrats? Not me, ever, ever, ever. I’ll die before I’ll ever vote for a Democrat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.