Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An All-Submarine Navy(?)
OpinionEditorials ^ | 6-19-07 | Mike Burleson

Posted on 06/21/2007 7:37:25 AM PDT by SShultz460

Last week, the third in a new class of underwater battleships, the USS MICHIGAN, joined the fleet after a $1 billion face lift. The 4 converted subs of the OHIO class, former Trident missile ships, are the undersea equivalent of the reborn IOWA class from the 1980’s. Armed with over 150 Tomahawk cruise missiles, plus the ability to carry special forces and unmanned vehicles, they give the Navy an incredible ability to strike decisively from the sea.

I am of the opinion that in full-scale shooting war at sea, the US surface navy will be devastated in the first day., by the combination of cruise missiles and stealthy submarines. The survivors would all be forced into port, unable to participate in the counterattack, which would likely be initiated by our own deadly nuclear attack submarines.

What this means is, our current force of colossal and pricey warships including aircraft carriers, cruisers, destroyers, and amphibious ships are obsolete in today’s precision, push button warfare. They are also tremendously expensive to build and operate, with only the richest of earth’s superpowers able to afford them in ever declining numbers. If this wasn’t reason enough for maritime nations to reevaluate their shipbuilding priorities, there are few if any jobs the surface fleet can do which the submarine cannot. I’ll elaborate:

Command of the Sea

Submariners say there are only 2 types of ships: submarines and targets. There’s valid reasons for this. Since World War 2 anti-submarine defenses have failed to match the attack boat’s advancements in speed, stealth, and weaponry. For instance, since 1945 the average speed of destroyers have remained at 30 knots, with only nuclear vessels able to maintain this rate for any period. In contrast, the velocity of nuclear attack submarines, beginning with the launch of USS NAUTILUS in 1954, has tripled and quadrupled from around 10 knots submerged to 30-40 knots.

Also, an antisubmarine vessel must get within a few miles of an enemy sub to fire its rockets or torpedoes. Its only long-range defense, the helicopter, is slow and must linger in a vulnerable hover while its sonar buoys seek out their prey. Some Russian-built boats come equipped with anti-aircraft missiles which makes this standard ASW tactic suicidal.

In contrast, a modern submarine can launch its missiles from 75 miles away and farther. Should it choose to close the distance, as occurred when a Chinese SONG class stalked the USS KITTY HAWK last year, to fire its ship killing torpedoes, it can do so at speeds as fast as and sometimes surpassing surface warships. Whether attacking with cruise missiles or wake-homing torpedoes the attack boat remains submerged; the preeminent stealth vessel.

The sub has likely held this dominate position on the high seas, since the dawn of the first nuke ships beginning in the 1950’s. The only lacking factor has been a full-scale naval war to prove it. The single example is the sinking of the Argentine cruiser BELGRANO 25 years ago by the British submarine HMS CONQUEROR in the Falklands Conflict. Afterward, the Argentine Navy fled to port and remained there!

Commerce Raiding/Protection:

This traditional role of the submarine is one which it excelled in the last century. The difference today is, neither America nor Britain has the capability to mass produce the thousands of anti-submarine escorts which just barely defeated Germany’s U-boats in 2 world wars, even if it would matter. In the next war at sea, the submarine would bring all commerce to a halt, making a mockery of the globalized free market system. The only counter to this menace is perhaps a combination of aircraft and submarine escorts, with the latter acting as the destroyer, shepherding its convoy through the “shark” ridden waters.

Amphibious Assault

Admittedly, this is not a role in which the submarine excels at , with its sparse crew and cargo capacity. Where they do stand out is the ability to land small raiding parties, like the elite Navy SEALs, and underwater demolition teams in preparation for a full-scale assault.

Still, with the submarine maintaining command of the seas, it would allow a surface amphibious task force free reign against an enemy beachhead. Rather than requiring expensive standing amphibs, reserve vessels could be maintained on both our coasts, with a cadre crew ready for any emergency. Some could also be rapidly converted with landing strips for heloes or whatever air assets are needed. Some small and inexpensive littoral ships fitted with cannon could provide escort close to shore.

For standard peacekeeping operations, some large subs could be built or converted for troop carrying, as in the above mentioned MICHIGAN. The ex-ballistic missile warship and her three sisters can load up to 66 SEALs, or more, I imagine, in a pinch, plus their equipment.

Conclusion

If America were to suddenly lose her preeminent surface fleet of carrier groups in such a future conflict, she would still have an excellent and capable submarine force to carry the fight to the enemy. The Navy says it must build 2 boats per year to maintain 50 in commission. Perhaps a doubling or tripling of this number would be necessary to replace the surface ships in the manner I propose. A fleet of 100-150 nuke submarines would be far cheaper to maintain, but also doubtless give the USN an unmatched mastery at sea for the rest of the century.

My blog is at newwars.blogspot.com

###

Mike Burleson is a regular columnist with Sea Classics magazine and an advocate of Military Reform. He resides in historic Charleston, SC. http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/honestnews/ http://newwars.blogspot.com/

charbookguy@myway.com


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: military; subs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: Eric in the Ozarks

Edmund Fitzgerald was referred to as a ship.

But I understand the boat reference.


21 posted on 06/21/2007 7:50:35 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460

Yes, I understand they are real greyhounds!


22 posted on 06/21/2007 7:50:45 AM PDT by RexBeach (Americans never quit. -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460
This sounds a lot like the talk that I heard in the late eighties early nineties.

Why do we still have Infantry? With all the fire power that a modern air force can bring to the battlefield, with waves and waves of missiles and bombers etc ... isn’t spending thousands of dollars per Infantryman a bit extravagant?

Then a real war came along....

23 posted on 06/21/2007 7:50:55 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460

Chicks allowed on Subs?


24 posted on 06/21/2007 7:51:48 AM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460
For some reason, that old saw about eggs and one basket comes to mind.
25 posted on 06/21/2007 7:52:28 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Not by anyone who sailed the Lakes.


26 posted on 06/21/2007 7:53:05 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460
SONOBUOY PING!

Not the usual fare for a Sonobuoy ping, but I thought there may be a few who would like to weigh in on the discussion.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium volume pinglist.

27 posted on 06/21/2007 7:53:19 AM PDT by magslinger (Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors. And miss. R.A.Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
I love aircraft carriers, but if they are attacked by waves of cruise missiles launched from a long way out, how would one evade and survive?

Carriers do not travel alone. There is a lot of interlocking firepower available to sweep the skies free of missiles.

Carriers can also launch a counter attack to the missile launch sites, without crossing over the nuclear threshold.

Of course once an opponent crosses that threshold, all bets are off...

28 posted on 06/21/2007 7:53:38 AM PDT by null and void (Tired of living in the shadows? Move to Sunny Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

One ping only Vasily..


29 posted on 06/21/2007 7:53:55 AM PDT by Armedanddangerous (Master of Sinanju (emeritus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dakine

Nope, the submarine force is the only part of the Navy that is still all-men.


30 posted on 06/21/2007 7:54:09 AM PDT by Pyro7480 ("Jesu, Jesu, Jesu, esto mihi Jesus" -St. Ralph Sherwin's last words at Tyburn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

My main idea is that you project power by protecting the Carrier. If you have SSGNs and a smaller SSN fleet you can smoke conventional Battle Groups that pair CV/Ns with Destroyers and only 2 SSNs


31 posted on 06/21/2007 7:55:13 AM PDT by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460
Some Russian-built boats come equipped with anti-aircraft missiles which makes this standard ASW tactic suicidal.

That's a myth. There is no way for a submarine to use such a missile without giving itself away, and that kind of defeats the purpose of the submarine in the first place.

32 posted on 06/21/2007 7:55:25 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460

Sneak a few of these babies into the Caspian Sea ;o)


33 posted on 06/21/2007 7:56:14 AM PDT by blasater1960 (Rehavam Zeevi- HaShem Yikom Damo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

flag


34 posted on 06/21/2007 7:57:54 AM PDT by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460

Can’t wait to see the submersible aircraft that go with them.


35 posted on 06/21/2007 7:58:03 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
So far as I know, new destroyers may be slower than WW2 counterparts. I believe Fletcher Class DDs were capable of speeds as high as 35 to 38 knots. I am correct on that?

They are slower, but they're better sea boats and more capable. And if you've got a missile chasing you then the fact that you only do 32 knots instead of 38 isn't going to matter much.

36 posted on 06/21/2007 7:58:04 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460

Yeah, but they’re a PITA to upgrade...but that’s a submarine flaw in general...other than that though, they are great boats!


37 posted on 06/21/2007 7:58:59 AM PDT by Andonius_99 (There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blasater1960
again?
38 posted on 06/21/2007 8:01:29 AM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460

A well defended carrier group is pretty formidable. Subs are part of that group.


39 posted on 06/21/2007 8:04:48 AM PDT by llevrok (I voted for George Bush - not Jorge Bushjoles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

Geez, they had those back in the late 60's...

40 posted on 06/21/2007 8:05:02 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson