Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Carolina treasurer indicted on cocaine charges [State Chairman Giuliani campaign]
CNN ^ | June 19, 2007 | Not Stated

Posted on 06/19/2007 7:35:57 PM PDT by Islander7

COLUMBIA, South Carolina (AP) -- South Carolina Treasurer Thomas Ravenel, a former real estate developer who became a rising political star after his election last year, was indicted Tuesday on federal cocaine charges.

Ravenel is also the state chairman for former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign.

Ravenel has stepped down from his volunteer responsibilities with the campaign, according to a statement released by Mark Campbell, Giuliani's political director.

Campbell said the campaign has no information about the accusations pending against Ravenel.

The millionaire is accused of buying less than 500 grams of the drug to share with other people in late 2005, U.S. Attorney Reggie Lloyd said.

Ravenel, 44, is charged with distribution of cocaine, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: cocaine; giuliani; giulianitruthfile; ravenel; rnc; stoprudy2008; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last
To: NapkinUser

Oops — I meant to ping you to post #139. Thanks for the original ping to this story!


141 posted on 06/20/2007 8:35:44 PM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: ellery
OUCH! Imagine what his executive cabinet would look like...

"Mommy, make the bad Freepers go away!"

142 posted on 06/20/2007 9:08:24 PM PDT by M203M4 (Vote Fruity Giuliani or the terrists will win! Abortion & gun control = price for freedumb!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Liz
You notice that Rudi had to release a statement today to answer questions about why he quit the Iraq Study Group? He was making some excuse about not being bipartisan enough to be a member of the group. FNC was covering it on the half-hour news updates so this is getting a lot of coverage. I assume they were "immunizing" Rudi from the charge that he deserted the commission.

Yeah, Rudi had to quit because of the presence of Democrats like Lee Atwater.

Maybe I should rewrite my tagline: Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa and Lee Atwater.
143 posted on 06/20/2007 9:59:56 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudi & McVain: tough on terror, scared of Iowa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued
Well I agree on fieldmarshaldj on Karen Floyd. Normally when you have a state like South Carolina, asking who is "electable" in the primary is a non-issue because just about anyone with an "R" next to their name will win in the fall. Putting Floyd in the primary makes it an issue though, as Lindsey Graham can honestly claim that if she's nominated, the seat might go to a RAT in the fall. There's really no execuse for losing statewide in Sotuh Carolina during an election year where the rest of the statewide GOP slate won handily -- it's kind of like a Massachuttes Dem being so awful they lose to the GOP. Personally I think Floyd lost not because she was perserved as "anti-education", but because her outspoken young earth creationist rhetoric (a.k.a. I'm absolutely sure the world was created in exactly 4004 B.C.) is too much for even the evagelical crowd there, but who knows? You guys want to run Floyd against Lindsey, go right ahead.

Finding a primary challenger for a maverick Republican is so much easier when you're not from the "anyone who doesn't agree with me 100% of the time should be drawn and quartered" kool-aid drinking school of thought. For example: In Rhode Island I rallied around Stephen Laffey to take on Linc Chafee. Is Stephen Laffey a true blue, 100% conservative? No, he's not. In fact, he's much more liberal than Graham. Laffey even distanced himself from conservativism. However, there was little doubt Laffey was a step up from Chaffee. Laffey agrees with me 60-70%, Chafee probably 10-20% of the time. Of course if I was going to scream treason and demand Laffey be lynched the moment he voted the "wrong" way on a judicial plan, or immigration bill, or torture compromise, I'd STILL be searching for a Chafee challenger today, because there just aren't alot of super pure 100% solid conservatives running around Rhode Island.

And unfortunately for you guys, you're going to find that out the hard way in South Carolina. It's more conservative than Rhode Island, yes, but as much as you guys want a prominent elected official who will do your bidding on every issue, their just aren't many running around. You guys were a lot more likeable on this forum when you understood who the REAL RINOs are -- the abortion-loving, gun-grabbing, gay-rights, tax-and-spend surrender monkey's in the GOP like Specter and Chafee. Now you've drank the Buchanan bridgage kool-aide where anyone who disagrees with you on a certain issue is a homosexual marxist globalist traitor. Dick Cheney was too liberal for the Buchanan brigagers, and now you guys are even going after Jon Kyl, who admit agrees with you 99% of the time but didn't do your bidding on one single bill. Hey fieldmarshaldj, so much for "this is not about a single-issue", eh?

You know the funny thing is, I know deep down inside you realize this "80% of Republican Senators are treasonous slimebags who must be purged, even if they agree with me the other 99% of the time" tilting-at-windmills stuff is a folly, which is why you make exceptions to your own rule of what kind of votes consitute a "RINO traitor". Otherwise your hometown boy Fred Thompson would be on the list, and we can't have that.

My advice to you is that you might want to learn from this Tom Ravenel (who you guys were begging to reconsider challenging "RINO traitor" Graham as recently as 48 hours ago), and do a little background check on these guys before you worship any prominent conservative official in the state as your savior to dethrone the "RINOs". I doubt you'll learn from this one though. Be prepared to end up with a lot more Ravenels in the future, as long as you insist on a stalin-like loyality where candidates MUST agree with you on EVERY issue or be "taken out" in the primary.

144 posted on 06/21/2007 1:00:33 AM PDT by BillyBoy (FACT: Governors WIN. Senators DON'T. Support the RIGHT Thompson in '08: www.tommy2008.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

the loyalty demands drove him to drugs?


145 posted on 06/21/2007 1:19:15 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; Clintonfatigued; JohnnyZ; Clemenza; EternalVigilance; BlackElk; Kuksool

Billy, you usually make rational assessments, but it stops at the doorstep of Graham. I have rarely seen any supposedly Conservative Republican PERSONALLY go out of his way to stick a finger in the eye of the Conservative movement as this guy has.

Y’know what, even if he voted 90% the right way, all of it is moot the second he can justify and CHAMPION a full-scale invasion force of the United States. Sorry, pal, but you don’t defend MY homeland and our rights to do so, and you can hit the bricks. That, btw, also goes for the President, too.


146 posted on 06/21/2007 1:23:18 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

It’s Billerys fault.


147 posted on 06/21/2007 1:28:07 AM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued
BTW, you guys are late to this thread, freepers have been having a field day knocking Republicans who tied themselves to Ravenel.

The irony seems lost on you guys (but based on the responces here, apperent to everyone on this thread), that you were ready to ditch a guy for casting his lot with McCain, but replace him with a guy who cast his lot with JulieAnnie. Everyone but you "anyone but Graham" types seem to realize replacing a McCain yes-man with a Giuliani yes-man is even more of a step down.(sort of like replacing the ol' reliable yugo with a horse-and-buggy) Oh well.

I'm very glad Lindsey didn't go the route the "True conservative" cokehead and start touting an abortion-loving drag queen for President. If he had, then you could rightly say "he's gone maverick" .

Hey, maybe even the cokehead realized the awkward situation you guys would have put him in. Kinda hard to simtaneouly tell South Carolinians to vote for a guy who agrees with them 10% of the time, and then argue that another guy who agrees with them 90% of the time is "too liberal" for South Carolina.

And you gotta love the fact the unofficial www.thomasravenel.com fan page is still up, reminding everyone that the cokehead Giuliani butt kisser was proclaimed the conservative hero to replace Lindsey.

148 posted on 06/21/2007 2:12:40 AM PDT by BillyBoy (FACT: Governors WIN. Senators DON'T. Support the RIGHT Thompson in '08: www.tommy2008.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; Clemenza; Clintonfatigued; JohnnyZ; Kuksool

Everybody is going to be casting their lot with Fred within a year, so all this early jockeying was pointless anyhow. I’m not going to blame Giuliani for entrusting Ravenel, either. I sincerly doubt he was told about the situation.

My suspicions over this matter are far more disturbing. Since the U.S. Attorney apparently knew about this situation for nearly 2 years, and since said official serves at the behest of the President (who himself had a certain personal habit in the 1980s, and would not likely be President today had his predecessor, who also had the same habit while as AR Governor, had not so lowered the bar on personal indiscretions, sexual or chemical), it seems most peculiar that at a time one of the administration’s greatest champions for the criminal invasion legalization is facing a serious challenge that this just HAPPENS to come to light (heaven forbid not BEFORE last year’s election). Very, very peculiar, indeed.

Quite sickening to realize that some of the wild-eyed allegations of the left against this administration might have even a grain of validity to them. More than enough of a reminder why we must keep our own house immaculate before we are fully able to after the opposition. Graham is the turd in the punchbowl, and it’s time to flush him and his fellow excretum out to sea.


149 posted on 06/21/2007 2:33:29 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale; fieldmarshaldj
Ravenel ran great campaigns, really very impressive.

But as a word of advice, I would suggest leaving the coke to the campaign manager.

150 posted on 06/21/2007 6:09:12 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ellery

Thanks. It may yet grow.


151 posted on 06/21/2007 6:25:01 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ; fieldmarshaldj; Liz; indylindy; calcowgirl

Rudy still carries too much luggage!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
152 posted on 06/21/2007 6:38:04 AM PDT by TommyDale (Rudy Giuliani’s candidacy is fading faster than an abortionist’s conscience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
My advice to you is that you might want to learn from this Tom Ravenel ...and do a little background check on these guys

As far as I know, there were not even whispers of anything untoward regarding Ravenel.

Anyone could have some sort of dirty laundry hidden away, but until and if it comes out, it's not possible to know about it.

That's why you never 'marry' a polician, because you'll never really know.

153 posted on 06/21/2007 6:46:21 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Remember Bernard Kerik or whatever his name was, recommending for some homeland security post? Giuliani was clueless then and clueless now about the backgorund of people with whom in associates.


154 posted on 06/21/2007 6:51:13 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Well, you hafta admit Rooty’s a dynamite accessorizer-—that pink luggage goes great with his pink ball gowns.


155 posted on 06/21/2007 6:51:55 AM PDT by Liz (It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

G-r-e-a-t tagline, BTW——one of the best.


156 posted on 06/21/2007 7:45:44 AM PDT by Liz (It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Liz
"Well, you hafta admit Rooty’s a dynamite accessorizer-—that pink luggage goes great with his pink ball gowns."

Rudy does have these pink shoes as accessories!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

157 posted on 06/21/2007 7:50:53 AM PDT by TommyDale (Rudy Giuliani’s candidacy is fading faster than an abortionist’s conscience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

(graphic courtesy of monkapotamus' expertise)

" Oh, please, let me sound conservative. Who knew I'd need those
'dumb pro-life Christian conservatives' to make a primary showing?"

"They're killing me on FR just b/c I had three wives, several mistresses,
was honored by NARAL, donated to Planned Parenthood, and marched
for gay rights under the NAMBLA banner."

158 posted on 06/21/2007 7:51:47 AM PDT by Liz (It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: ellery

Nice compilation-—very thorough.


159 posted on 06/21/2007 7:54:04 AM PDT by Liz (It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Yeah, but these are Rooty's faves.


160 posted on 06/21/2007 7:59:22 AM PDT by Liz (It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson