Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bloomberg Leaves Republican Party (Breaking)
WCBS-TV | 06/19/07 | WCBS-TV New york

Posted on 06/19/2007 3:13:48 PM PDT by StatenIsland

Mayor Michael Bloonberg has announced that he is leaving the Republican Party, and will continue his Mayoralty as an Independent.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: bloomberg; goodriddance; nycmayor; rino; surprisesurprise; unity08; whodathunkit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-331 next last
To: ModelBreaker
The great ethanol scam is another. Large agribusinesses have seen the value of their land increase by 50% because of the money they paid to politicians to force, at best, a marginal alternate energy source onto the market.

As a young news junkie, I for years wondered what it was that Archer Daniels Midland did that made it important enough to sponsor Meet the Press and Face the Nation alongside legendary corporations like General Electric and financial mammoths like Smith Barney and Merrill Lynch. ADM's commercials didn't promote a product that could be purchased by the general public, but the ads were vague as to reasons why it should be invested in as well -- it was like ADM was more of a charity than a business ("Supermarket to the World").

Only later did I understand that the targets of ADM's campaigns were not individual consumers, but politicians who watched the shows every Sunday. ADM was insisting it was the be-all and end-all to all sorts of "problems" that government claimed to be able to solve, gave gobs of cash to politicians, and every Sunday showed sixty second promotionals showing the pols how they could sell soybeans and corn as panacea to the electorate. Finally, it all paid off with ethanol getting its toehold in the market as "cleaner" and "greener" although the green is mostly in the form of greenbacks.

Now, after many years of mentioning it in speeches, President Bush is still holding on to the heretofore fruitless notion that sawgrass could help break the nationwide addiction to oil. In retrospect, I am not surprised he would buy it.

261 posted on 06/19/2007 7:08:53 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Has George W. Bush been taking Carter's Little Pills?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

I don’t think so Steve_Seattle. I wish nothing more but the polling I’ve seen so far has him hurting GOP candidates in purple and blue states. Also, right now, a large amount of the GOP feel like Bush and the Republican Party has left them. You and I of course know that the “Republicanism” represented by Bloomberg has nothing to do with genuine conservative values, but middle of the road Republicans we count on might get pulled in by him.


262 posted on 06/19/2007 7:14:26 PM PDT by Mister Politics (www.misterpolitics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Dave W
Ole Rudy will be the nominee. Then the whining will begin. The Beast or Rudy or Bloomberg? What on earth are you going to do?

Given that Ghouliani is currently behind a candidate that hasn't even announced yet in the Rasmussen poll, I assume your comments aren't serious?

263 posted on 06/19/2007 7:19:50 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

so the buffoon thinks he can get the Dems nomination?


264 posted on 06/19/2007 7:22:02 PM PDT by RDTF (www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Now, after many years of mentioning it in speeches, President Bush is still holding on to the heretofore fruitless notion that sawgrass could help break the nationwide addiction to oil. In retrospect, I am not surprised he would buy it.

It's really easy to "buy" a solution that involves no cost and no tradeoffs and is far enough away that noone can prove it's a stupid idea. The green movement has thrived on that kind of magical thinking for decades.

265 posted on 06/19/2007 7:26:09 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

This is hugh! And series! A mayor with a history of changing parties has changed parties again!

If anyone should be concerned about him running it ought to be Hillary since Rudy hasn’t any genuine chance of getting the nomination.


266 posted on 06/19/2007 7:26:31 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Technogeeb
Well said.

Thanks. On thinking about this further, the best example of the rich in their buy-the-pols mode today is our country's China policy. One cannot explain the truly insane behavior both Clinton and W have engaged in with respect to the Chinese without resorting to the massive support for appeasement of China by the chamber-of-commerce guys--and, of course, China itself buying the Clintons.

267 posted on 06/19/2007 7:30:37 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
He’s going to be the Ross Perot of 2008, giving us a Clinton Presidency.

I think you give him far too much credit. The media connection is his asset. Everyone knows he's a spineless pipesmoker.

268 posted on 06/19/2007 7:32:09 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Thank you St. Jude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

Bllomberg is now an independent.

That’s not as bad as leaving the GOP to join al Qaeda like Ron Paul.


269 posted on 06/19/2007 7:34:56 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (Speaker Pelosi - Three cheers for Amnesty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

Right on. His progression is from opportunistic Liberal Democrat to opportunistic Liberal Republican to opportunistic Liberal Independent and he will draw away liberal Progressives making it good for the GOP if they get their s..t together in time.


270 posted on 06/19/2007 7:35:45 PM PDT by Postman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

No way. He’ll steal liberal votes, not conservatives. I think this is a good thing for Republicans. Let the RINOs leave now.


271 posted on 06/19/2007 7:37:08 PM PDT by rintense (I'm 4 Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Well, I have to admit to a bit of guessing. By the way, I love your spelling of Giuliani.

However, Giuliani is staying steady in the polls despite the fact that his liberal social positions are becoming widely known.

The only reason Thompson is ahead by one point in the Rasmussen poll is because they stopped including Newt in the list of candidates, so Newt's supporters had to choose someone else. But the trend is clear...Thompson gaining and Rudy steady.

The media have not yet started to rip Thompson apart and neither has any of the candidates. When they get through ripping him to shreds, what will be left? This we don't know. Fred has hinted he may very well get out his red plaid shirt. Will that work today, the way it did in 1994?

Anyway, I like Fred, but I also think Rudy may have the best chance to beat the Beast. As Reagan said, "If you can't get the whole thing, some is better than nothing."

272 posted on 06/19/2007 7:37:15 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
He’s going to be the Ross Perot of 2008, giving us a Clinton Presidency.

Bloomberg peeling away a bunch of Hillary's support would be a sweet thing to behold, wouldn't it? :-)

273 posted on 06/19/2007 7:37:54 PM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

I will bet you Rudy will not be the republican nominee. Democrat, maybe. But not republican.


274 posted on 06/19/2007 7:41:11 PM PDT by rintense (I'm 4 Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

He may spend $1 billion on the race. If so, he will have impact. The billion dollars is his words.


275 posted on 06/19/2007 7:42:44 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
"'You sound like a communist.' Since when is being rich a bad thing in a capitalist country? You apparently can't comprehend English. I posted: Maybe he will take the big-business country-club Republicans with him. Why is that communist? Either you don't understand what communism is or you have an affinity for free speech -- and that sounds rather communist -- if you want to do namecalling." af·fin·i·ty /əˈfɪnɪti/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[uh-fin-i-tee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, plural -ties., adjective –noun 1. a natural liking for or attraction to a person, thing, idea, etc. 2. a person, thing, idea, etc., for which such a natural liking or attraction is felt. 3. relationship by marriage or by ties other than those of blood (distinguished from consanguinity). 4. inherent likeness or agreement; close resemblance or connection. Yes, I have an affinity for free speech. And, yes, dislike of big-business country-club Republicans is communist.
276 posted on 06/19/2007 7:49:55 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

He could spend 10 billion. He could not get more than 2%. Don’t get me wrong. I hope he does better than I think, because he takes votes right out of the Democrats’ hide. But, he is simply a bad candidate. He has a voice that makes Hillary’s sound mellifluous. He will not win or even come close. You can take that to the bank.


277 posted on 06/19/2007 8:00:44 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

Except that Hagel is pro-gun, pro-life, and anti-taxing and spending. I don’t see how he could run on a ticket with Bloomberg.


278 posted on 06/19/2007 8:02:03 PM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: AfterManyASummer
socially libertarian

Are you insane??? A "libertarian" gun-grabber???
279 posted on 06/19/2007 8:04:31 PM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

With the majority of conservative voters still very upset with both the Democrats at every political level and with the Republicans at every political level, is there any possibility that both the Constitution Party and the Libertarian Party will start seeing much more support and much more votes for their candidates at every political level from now on?


280 posted on 06/19/2007 8:22:28 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-331 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson