Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Republicans Work $4.4 Billion Border Security Amendment
Fox News ^ | 06/19/2007 | EagleUSA

Posted on 06/19/2007 7:09:04 AM PDT by EagleUSA

WASHINGTON — GOP negotiators of an immigration reform bill are crafting a large border security amendment with mandatory, immediate funding that they hope will assuage concerns of both Republicans and Democrats, FOX News has learned.

The senators are looking at a way to please conservatives who are skeptical Congress will ever fund the bill's border security provisions, as well as keep Democratic negotiators on board in a last ditch effort to save the comprehensive reform bill.

It is a political tightrope fraught with peril, but the members know they need more Republican support to break through the logjam.

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a principle author of the amendment with Republican Sens. Jon Kyl and Mel Martinez, says his amendment is designed to be "a confidence builder" to address members' concerns that ramped up border security provisions in the bill won't, in the end, get funded.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; fraud; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; noamnestyforillegals; tokenism; vampirebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Such hypocrisy and political tokenism. This country is wasting way over $100 BILLION per year SUPPORTING illegals, and these guys are fluffing their feathers over "fighting" to a token $4.4 BILLION to, most likely, do nothing material to stop the flow of illegals across the border -- what a slap in the face of the real American patriot and citizen.
1 posted on 06/19/2007 7:09:08 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Not going to work — Build the fence on both borders first so when you deport illegals they stay deported. We also need a virtual fence that is under surveillance 24/7 so INS can immediately send agents to anywhere on the fence where there is a breach.

Maybe Bush/Rove and some others can get away with pandering to the illegals, but they can forget the rest of us. We are not buying.

Don’t want to hear about anything but securing the border and identifying the illegals. Excuse me but they have not done a good job of building the fence right now so why would we listen.


2 posted on 06/19/2007 7:12:16 AM PDT by PhiKapMom ( Inhofe for Senate 08 -- Broken Glass Republican -- vote out the RATs in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: EagleUSA

Let me be honest here. Yes, I want border security and interior enforcement, but even if these things come about, I really don’t want these 20+ million illegals made legal. I don’t want them here and especially the chain migration that they will produce, which could run into another tens of millions more sooner rather than later.

If we secure the border, provide interior enforcement and worker verification, most of these 20+ million will go home. If we need more workers, we already have guest worker programs that can be expanded.


4 posted on 06/19/2007 7:17:03 AM PDT by umgud ("When illegals are banned, only greedy businesses and welfare providers will have them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Build the fence, in the bill which was signed LAST YEAR.

First.

When it’s done, then discuss amnesty.

Not the other way around.


5 posted on 06/19/2007 7:18:36 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (D is for Defeatism. R is for Reconquista.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
No, it doesn't. They're just putting lipstick on the amnesty pig. It doesn't change all is objectionable about it. That bill needs to be declared dead, period!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

6 posted on 06/19/2007 7:18:37 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle
"they’re-trying-an-end-around-run ping"

Yup.

RECALL all these SOB's!!

8 posted on 06/19/2007 7:26:14 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

If only it had a provision prohibiting effective immediate amnesty (probation) for 20 million illegals, it’d be perfect.


9 posted on 06/19/2007 7:26:33 AM PDT by mikeus_maximus ("Just remember the words of Patrick Henry - 'Kill me or let me live.'" -- Coach Bill Peterson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

This is such a red herring. If funding were the problem, then the administration would already be implementing the border security measures that are already funded (e.g., building part of a fence, etc.). Since Bush is not doing that, it becomes clear that the problem is unwillingness to enforce our laws, not inability due to insufficient funds. Consequently, this appropriation is just an attempt to make this fraud of a bill merely a more expensive fraud. It makes me sick that they’re trying to sell us this lie with our own hard-earned dollars.


10 posted on 06/19/2007 7:28:48 AM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
WHAT PART OF NO DO THESE IDIOTS NOT UNDERSTAND?
11 posted on 06/19/2007 7:28:58 AM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

SSDD.


12 posted on 06/19/2007 7:29:28 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: EagleUSA

The sad part is they think we’re stupid enough to fall for it. Even after all the letters, faxes, phone calls and emails, all the discussion in the new and old media, they still think they can throw us an enforcement bone and we’ll run after it and scoop it up.

Not gonna work, Senators! You do not have our trust on this issue.


14 posted on 06/19/2007 7:34:30 AM PDT by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

We no longer trust congress or our administration to enforce any immigration law..new or old. That means we must by democratic means replace them.
The desire by our establishment to import millions of unscreened, uneducated workers is an insult to all of us.


15 posted on 06/19/2007 7:36:27 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Help me folks. I’m not as smart as these RINOs.

In all this discussion about this $4.4 BILLION bribe to enhance border security, has anyone seen exactly what $4.4 BILLION will be spent on? I have looked everywhere, including Thomas, and I can’t find any specifics as to where this enormous pile of dollars will go. Maybe they will use it to print up millions of cardboard signs for the border saying “Please Don’t Enter”. Or maybe it will go to remodel Chertoff’s office. Probably it will go to the favorite companies of Harry Reid and Lindsey Graham to do endless studies on how one might secure the border.

Gosh, I wish I wasn’t so dumb.


16 posted on 06/19/2007 7:36:43 AM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
“It is a political tightrope fraught with peril....”

Typical Beltway, myopic narcissism - as if the real "peril" is found in exposing themselves to political risk. Absent is any attention to the danger our country faces if they actually pass this monstrosity.

17 posted on 06/19/2007 7:37:02 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
"When you see those three, you know it's a scam on the American people and the Constitution."

I include Trent Lott into that group too.

18 posted on 06/19/2007 7:41:41 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson