Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theo
No. None.

You really see none? I mean, you don't think that various forms of geology, carbon dating, etc. at least hint at the possibility that the world is older than the new earth creationists preach?

48 posted on 06/17/2007 7:48:21 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Rodney King

“... new earth creationists.”

How many creation theories exist? Your citing only the “new earth” theory shows that you don’t understand alternate theories to the theory that God is irrelevant and that “all this” developed slowly through cycles of death and life by a series of random events.

It’s really a fascinating set of theories, this one based on Scripture and supported by the evidence. I challenge you to look into it.


54 posted on 06/17/2007 7:51:48 PM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Rodney King

I wouldn’t waste time on someone like that.

Landru guide me.


63 posted on 06/17/2007 8:05:48 PM PDT by mgstarr (KZ-6090 Smith W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Rodney King
I mean, you don't think that various forms of geology, carbon dating, etc. at least hint at the possibility that the world is older than the new earth creationists preach?

Nope. How's that for being positive.

464 posted on 06/21/2007 12:31:23 AM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson