Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hate speech redefined
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | June 17, 2007 | Editorial

Posted on 06/17/2007 12:21:15 PM PDT by Graybeard58

In Oakland, Calif., "marriage," "family values" and "union of a man and a woman" have been deemed hate speech. Here's how it happened: Oakland has anti-discrimination rules protecting homosexuals. In 2002, a letter distributed via the city's e-mail system invited municipal employees to "National Coming-Out Day" activities as part of the city's celebration of diversity and homosexuality. Two workers responded with fliers on employee bulletin boards and elsewhere announcing the formation of the Good News Employee Association for people who oppose "all views which seek to redefine the natural family and marriage." Naturally, a lesbian co-worker was horribly offended and told the city attorney's office the fliers made her feel "targeted" and "excluded."

So city officials did some targeting and excluding of their own. In a memo, they called the Good News fliers "homophobic" and threatened to fire anyone caught posting them. Meanwhile, left-wing groups and heterophobes continued to have unfettered access to the e-mail system and bulletin boards to attack the Bible and vilify Christians.

Good News sued, allowing the U.S. District Court to declare that "natural family," "marriage" and "family values" have "anti-homosexual import." The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, so unless the Supreme Court overrules, the thought police will have imposed through judicial fiat yet another infringement upon free speech, this one a far-reaching rule forbidding co-workers from speaking "any verbiage that could be offensive to gay people."

America was founded on the belief that full, unrestrained debate is vital to the nation's health and the best way of separating good ideas from bad.

When anti-discrimination laws convey special rights upon minority groups, they upset the constitutional balance and discriminate against the majority by excluding diverse ideas in the name of inclusion.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: California
KEYWORDS: heteronormative; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Graybeard58
The homophiles must be having a fit with today being "Father's Day." Which one gets to be the father and which got to be the mother last month?

A contrived life always is full of these types of difficulties.

21 posted on 06/17/2007 7:02:24 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

But they’re the Master Race. Just ask them.


22 posted on 06/18/2007 10:56:55 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

The concept of hate crime exists to give FedGov some police powers where they had none. Several local municipalities have run with the idea, not realizing what it is. Some sociologists have absconded with the idea, which they will do with any idea they stumble across, and created hate speech as if that means something. This should be a footnote in the history of history, but time will tell.


23 posted on 06/18/2007 11:01:27 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Boy- I wouldn’t be able to hold a job there, no matter what.


24 posted on 06/18/2007 11:08:09 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

The homophiles must be having a fit with today being “Father’s Day.” Which one gets to be the father and which got to be the mother last month?
A contrived life always is full of these types of difficulties.””

I still want to know what bathroom they all use. How do they decide? Will I walk in on a “male/femal” in the ladies room one of these days???

God- I miss the old wooden 2 holer we had at the one room school.


25 posted on 06/18/2007 11:12:15 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Getting us to this point from the traditional values of early America took some doing upon the part of the Socialist theorists, who seek to subordinate all individual thought to artificially imposed new social norms. Freeing America from this sort of madness is going to take some doing on the part of those of us who still believe in the traditional verities, including that basic American one, that holds that freedom is something you hold despite the take over of your Government by the afore-identified Socialist theorists.

The idea that people who flaunt pride in their sexual deviancy should be beyond criticism is beyond equivalence to something Dean Swift would have ridiculed in Gulliver's Travels. It is in a class of its own. This sort of thing is condemning our generation to everlasting ridicule in the future; that is, assuming that human liberty of free expression survives somewhere.

William Flax

26 posted on 06/18/2007 11:28:41 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson