Posted on 06/17/2007 10:22:37 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian
Edited on 06/17/2007 11:27:20 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Ronald Reagan is America's most beloved president of recent years. We remember how he restored prosperity while ending the Cold War without getting us all nuked....
It's worth looking back on Reagan's policy on involving U.S. troops in the quarrels and hatreds of the Middle East. In 1983, he committed U.S. Marines to Lebanon. On Oct. 23, a terrorist truck bomb blew up the troops' barracks, killing 220 Marines and 21 other troops.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.ocregister.com ...

RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for National Defense and Foreign Affairs.
RON PAUL is the ONLY 100% Anti-Terrorist candidate.
"I got to know President Reagan in 1976 when, as a freshman congressman, I was one of only four members of that body to endorse then-Governor Reagans primary challenge to President Gerald Ford. I had the privilege of serving as the leader of President Reagans Texas delegation at the Republican convention of 1976, where Ronald Reagan almost defeated an incumbent president for his partys nomination. I was one of the millions attracted to Ronald Reagan by his strong support for limited government and the free-market. I felt affinity for a politician who based his conservative philosophy on '...a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom.' I wish more of todays conservative leaders based their philosophy on a desire for less government and more freedom." Ron Paul, Remembering Ronald Reagan
![]() |
I'm voting for former Vietnam Combat Flight Surgeon, and Leader of Ronald Reagan's Electoral Delegation from Texas: In 2008, I'm Voting for RON PAUL! |
![]() |
Had 9/11 happened on Reagan’s watch I’m sure he would have thought a bit differently.
This is NOT an elect Ron Paul forum.
That was Reagan’s ONLY blunder. If we would have kicked some major raghead ass instead of leaving, they wouldn’t be the problem they are today.
In retrospect, I think it's clear that his first instincts were correct.
Ron Paul supported Military Vengeance against those responsible for 9/11, just as Ronald Reagan would have done.
Ronald Reagan did NOT believe in using the United States Military for Foreign Nation-Building, and neither does Ron Paul.
This is NOT an elect Ron Paul forum.
This is a Conservative Forum.
And Ron Paul is THE 100% best Reagan Republican Conservative in the Race.
Reagans words and wisdom, at the time, were correct, but it is vital to realize that both were BEFORE 9/11. What would Reagan have done after Pearl Harbor? And what would he have done after 9/11. Those are very important differences between then and now.
It is suicide to bring our troops home, with out full border security.
Oh, let him talk. Not very many people believe that Paul stands a chance of getting nominated anyway. :)
It is one of the reasons the Bin Laden gave for attack us on 09-11. He stated the Americans are weak fighters who will run away rather then take casualties.
So if you insist on spaming the board endlessly with this Paulite drivel, at least have the honesty to quit invoking Reagan. You clearly know utterly nothing about the man.
Ron Paul and Ronald Reagan should not be mentioned in the same sentence.
Ron Paul is a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic.
MHOOC.
Exactly. The suicide bombing that killed our soldiers in their barracks in the Middle East can hardly be compared to suicide bombers coming to our own shores, hijacking planes, flying them into buildings, and killing thousands of civilians.
Paul does not fully realize the importance of Islamofascism. He also implies that it’s our fault that they attacked us. He’s a crackpot.
Thank you for blaming Ronald Reagan for 9/11.
You must be very proud of yourself.
In fact, Ronald Reagan's wise and courageous decision SAVED countless lives.
Why should we involve ourselves in the pointless quarrels and hatreds on the Middle East? Ronald Reagan was against it, AND HE WAS RIGHT.
Given the circumstances at the time, Reagan may been right (personally I think he was wrong), and wouldn't apply to todays events.
Also, I disagree with your choice in candidates - but thats poli tics.
I live in an area with a lot of high ranking military, some of whom I know socially.
Whenever the topic of Reagan pulling out of Lebanon comes up — they all respond with respect for that withdrawal at that time. They say “Reagan said ‘The h=ll with you people — we’re outta here.’” They admire him for that.
Keep in mind, these are active military not keyboard warriors — so they have a very pragmatic perspective.
Pulling out of Beirut was the most costly mistake made by the Reagan administration. If Reagan had been able to see into the future and realize the consequences of his actions, he may well have stood against the democrats and done what was right. Ron Paul would not have.
Nor did he leave the "middle east" ...or was Libya not part on the larger middle east issue and major sponsor of Islamic terrorism at the time?
You should tone it down a bit.
First thing you know all you’ll have left on your “Great Ron Paul Ping List” is you and your mate.
Ron Paul - Ron Reagan
Ron Paul - Ron Reagan
Ron Paul - Ron Reagan
Ron Paul - Ron Reagan
Ron Paul - Ron Reagan
Ron Paul - Ron Reagan
Ron Paul - Ron Reagan
Just to show you I can!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.