Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democrats' Democracy Problem
The Washington Post ^ | June 17, 2007 | Ronald D. Asmus

Posted on 06/17/2007 6:02:19 AM PDT by gpapa

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: gpapa

It’s not only that the Democrats have stopped promoting democracy abroad, they’re all about stifling it at home. Item: Massachuetts Democrats went to extraordinary lengths to prevent the public from voting on the issue of gay marriage. Item: Democrats want to shut down Talk Radio with the Fairness Doctrine. Item: Democrat dominated universities, colleges and public schools have become cess pools of political correctness and speech control. Item: Democrats want to regulate everything that moves and subsidize anything that doesn’t move.


21 posted on 06/17/2007 7:04:38 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; yldstrk; gpapa; nyyankeefan; pleikumud; kabar; sphinx

.

Long ago Democrat Sen. TED KENNEDY fooled a post-WATERGATE Deomcrat Congress into cutting off all our funding for the then Free People of South Vietnam to fight for their own Freedom with. Giving us all to sadly in the end:

.

Pictures of a vietnamese Re-Education (SLAVE LABOR) Camp

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1308949/posts

http://www.JourneyFromTheFall.com

.

What Price is there for the still Free (that’s US) to pay now, I wonder, in a new time of war in a new century...
...with our own Freedom directly at stake right here at home..?

12 million suddenly missing Iraqi purple voting fingers on our TV & Internet Screens just for starters..?

BET on it.

.


22 posted on 06/17/2007 7:11:53 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Jimmy Carter was the one who told us we need to get used to communism and other forms of government. Now days we are willing to prosecute those that would bring down a communist government.

We have those that are perfectly willing to allow an insane government to posses nuclear weapons. Who is more insane?

23 posted on 06/17/2007 7:13:36 AM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

True enough. We left a sad legacy in Vietnam. Walking away from Iraq won’t be that easy given the geostrategic importance of the region and the nature of the enemy, i.e., militant Islamic fundamentalism. We have a lot more at stake in Iraq than we had in Vietnam.


24 posted on 06/17/2007 7:15:37 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

BTTT


25 posted on 06/17/2007 7:16:53 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
After the loss of JFK we had to wait until Ronald Reagan to find a president made of that kind of pride.

The Kennedy inaugural speech must be held in shame by most Democrats. I would bet that it is no longer in school textbooks.

26 posted on 06/17/2007 7:20:41 AM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

The Democrats do not support democracy!! When they are in power, all they do is destroy it and our Constitutional Freedoms. When out of power, they state the Republicans are (projection) and hamper all efforts to spread Freedom and representative government.

Until the Democrats rid their party of Communists/Socialists (national and global), wannabe tyrants (it’s “for the children” so do not question them or you are a “bigot”), Islamofascist Appeasers (aka “dhimmis”), and “big brother” control freaks the Dems will NEVER stand for Freedom and Democracy.

Waco, Ruby Ridge, “FBI/IRS Gate”, REAL illegal wiretaps against Republicans, “FileGate”, suspicious deaths of Clinton’s Political foes and evidence holders, denial of basic Constitutional Freedoms (Unconstitutional “gun control laws” and the “Fairness Doctrine” being just two examples), and a DO NOTHING response to terrorism DO NOT promote security or democracy!

The Democratic Party is NOTHING but a bunch of tyrants in waiting. The Republican party needs to take note.


27 posted on 06/17/2007 7:27:53 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud

Today’s “Democrats” are international socialists - enemies of the United States. And many Republicans are not much better. That’s why the RNC is losing donations.

Exactly right. We need to get rid of the rinos and get more true republicans in power. Failure to due so will only result in the US suffering from the European malaise, stagnation, no motivation and general self loathing.


28 posted on 06/17/2007 7:34:00 AM PDT by MadAnthony1776 ("liberalism" = "do as I say, not as I do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
THIS is the modern Democratic Party:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1851022/posts?page=21#21

The article referenced is from Rolling Stone and is a criticism by a leftist on liberalism. As usual with a leftist, they do not QUITE understand why they are wrong. I will give the writer credit for introspection, but his inability to see the murderous evil of his base philosophy, socialism, and his usual leftist projection of acts on the right leaves me shaking my head at the predictable sophomoric argument.

The REAL meat of the article is in the “comments” section. This is where the REAL democrats, the “revolutionary socialists” rip into the author. Here is just on quote which pretty much sums up what the Left thinks of Freedom.

“Historically, the Left had a vision: replace capitalism with socialism. Almost everywhere in the world, serious socialist and communist parties emerged and contended for power, and were successful over a third of the earth. In America, socialism didn’t resonate with the working class, and so the American Left emerged as liberals, slow-motion socialists. The Left is still anticapitalist – at varying levels of consciousness – but has no positive vision of what it wants to replace capitalism with. For a while, the exciting new socialist societies of China, Cuba and Vietnam inspired the American Left, and still do attract the admiration of sections of it. But they somehow didn’t really retain their holding power and nothing really big and attractive has come along to take their place. Perhaps Venezuela will work out ... if Mr Chavez carries on in the revolutionary tradition of closing down right-wing propaganda outlets, and moves on towards seizing the wealth of Venezuela’s rich class and putting the economy into the hands of the workers state. Perhaps some good work can be done in America by the prefiguration of revolutionary rule. There are few places where the Left has much power, but where such power is held by the Left, let it be used. At the moment, this is mainly on college campuses, and some Leftists are doing good work there by breaking up conservative meetings and attempting to make racist and sexist and homophobic speech and thought into crimes. Showing what a future socialist society would be like by suppressing right-wing reactionaries and wiping out thoughtcrime could go a long way towards reversing the image of the Left as drippy, sandal-wearing wimps.”

Doug

"Doug" is the useful idiot who posted in the comments section and gave us a clear warning about WHAT the left is and why it is a danger. This is why they want us disarmed and this is what they indent to do when we are.

29 posted on 06/17/2007 7:40:31 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; kabar; pleikumud

.

NEVER FORGET

.

Thank you for your CLARITY, kabar.

The same Sen. TED KENNEDY that helped doom the then Free South Vietnamese People by cutting off all their Military and Medical supply funding to save themselves with,

...just when the Communist Soviet Union had given $6 Billion to the Communist North for its ‘Final Solution’ in the South,

...is pushing real hard again to do the same thing to the Free People of a now Free Iraq.

Even to the point of his lying to the American People on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ when he stated earlier this year that...

“Only about 100,000 people in Vietnam lost their lives after the Fall of Saigon” (many more did) &
that

“We’ve now been in Iraq longer than we were in Vietnam” (actually its been a lot less).

This from a Sen. TED KENNEDY who was shown in person precisely what the Fight for Freedom was really all about in Vietnam from the very start:

http://www.lzxray.com/guyer_set1.htm
(See 5th Photo down of Sen. TED KENNEDY touring our 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) Headquarters in South Vietnam’s Central Highlands at the very beginning of the Vietnam War, October 1965)
A Photo taken when the Senator and his partner Rep. JOHN TUNNEY were touring Military Operations going on at the time all over South Vietnam.

.

NEVER FORGET


30 posted on 06/17/2007 7:47:42 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The Democrats are equal opportunity totalitarians ~ making it fair to describe them as fascists.

IMO, the leadership of the Democrat party along with most Democrat politicians, are nothing more than political opportunist. Liberalism is far more subject to being co-opted by opportunist than conservatism. That is why the Dems appear to be fascists. They really do not care about the common man or the common good - only to the extent that these serve them as political advantage.

They fancy socialism not because they think it will help people, but because socialism will help the opportunist politician gain and maintain power. When their opportunism is taken further it looks like fascism. When taken to extremes, it looks like communism (more exactly, Stalin-ism).

The thing that today's Dems lack is the guts to be communists. Lacking guts seems to afflict the Repubs, too, but its manifestation is to have the leadership of the Repubs look like...er...well...Trent Lott.

31 posted on 06/17/2007 9:16:05 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator ("You can observe a lot just by watching." - Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator

YOu underestimate the nastier sort of Democrat.


32 posted on 06/17/2007 12:50:18 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Actually the Dems believe in govt. socialism and redistribution of anyone’s wealth via tax increases. Democracy they may indeed like if they could have votes on everything especially in Red States. What they do not believe in , is republican democracy. And since they are today’s isolationists, why help anyone under an Islamic and especially a socialist dictatorship all round the globe? If the USA is attacked by one of these thugs, the Dems can always blame Bush and the GOP and probably get away with it.


33 posted on 06/17/2007 7:22:17 PM PDT by phillyfanatic ( w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson