Exclusive: Shocking finding on US Department of State Website - Questions on Amnesty.

jedward ^ | 6-16-2007 | jedward

[jedward]

“answering questions when you’ve failed to communicate is a better response than ridiculing those who have tried to decipher your meaning in spite of it’s flaws.”

Please point me to a question I’ve not answered and I’ll be glad to answer it.

[jedward]

“Your perception of “informative” is itself “informative”.”

So how were you informed?

[jedward]

“You’ve probably served our country for more years than he has lived in this world.”

Well, I’m almost old enough to drink.

[jedward]

“I believe you have misunderstood, he isn’t searching for anything.”

What is it you think I’m doing?

[jedward]

“tried to decipher your meaning in spite of it’s flaws.”

Teach me please. What are the flaws.

[jedward]

And while I’m learning, then you can show me where my mis-understanding of the Site Owner’s “Statement by the Founder” seems to be. Maybe I don’t really understand the excerpt below, but it sure seems pretty consistent with my Article. If you don’t see this, then you absolutely have blinders on.

“We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.”

[jedward]

Not sure if you were aware of this portion of the “Statement from the Founder” of FreeRepublic. It deals directly with the topic of the UN.

[WorkerbeeCitizen]

I like to say thanx for you effort on this. As you may know, I've been trying to find out who the players are on another puzzle I'm working on and although, these organizations "ain't all of em", for that puzzle, it is enough to pretty much put the picture together in North America/Western Hemisphere. To your question. “What does this have to do with Amnesty”

Well, on the face of it, nothing. It seems benign enough, something a bunch of elites came up with as a tool to deal with other nations in this hemisphere. This one statement should start most here to thinkin.

As post#70 states;
"You mean you don't see the implications of the United States being indistinguishable among other countries within a higher level of an international political region in an American Department of State website?"

This poster stated the most obvious reason (Bold), that the amnesty bill must pass; the US must be indistinguishable for the rest of the hemisphere in order to fulfill its stated objectives. What are the objectives? - The North American Union of course. It is being constructed before our eyes, in pieces and under many names and guises. How else would "United States being indistinguishable among other countries?

Does the Amnesty bill still look like a diversion? To me, it looks just like another piece of the same puzzle.

Unfortunately this only one phase of the plan - no I won't go there yet as I am still trying to name all the players :)

[WorkerbeeCitizen]

Nicely put. Typical social engineer tool.

[WorkerbeeCitizen]

" Having read your post, I'd say that if you have something to say about things, you do seem to have a hard time doing so, whether it's answering the question above, or anything else. But don't worry, as you grow older you could well learn to communicate more effectively. Part of which might be to learn that answering questions when you've failed to communicate is a better response than ridiculing those who have tried to decipher your meaning in spite of it's flaws."

You are being facetious of course - right?

[WorkerbeeCitizen]

What I haven’t figured out yet and maybe someone else has, is; Why the big rush NOW?

[kabar]

The short answer is that I don’t believe in rewarding people who violated our laws mutiple times with citizenship. And amnesty will just invite another wave of illegals just like what happened after 1986.

[kabar]

By the same logic providing a brief introduction to our nation in the section which is an A-Z listing of countries seems to make sense. After all, wouldn't you expect an A-Z listing of baseball teams to include the New York Yankees, even if the web site was in New York?

Makes sense to you but not to me. If you look at the countries listed, you will also notice that it includes background notes and the name of our ambassador, which is linked to a bio. We don't have a US ambassador to the US. We don't have foreign relations with ourselves. It appears you don't understand the role of the State Department in our government. The basic Mission Statement is: Create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community.

[Maximum Leader]

Or have State’s webmaster just steal the CIA’s US info page (its government property, so no copyright). :o)
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html

[tillacum]

Our state department never was big on helping America or even slowly helps Americans overseas.

[jedward]

Noted,and everything “foreign” runs through State, so I indeed watch them very closely in understanding the United States. And when others do the same, they’ll be enlightened to doubt.

[jedward]

Thanks kabar.

[hedgetrimmer]

As someone who has worked in the State Department for 28 years, I would be happy to answer any questions you might have.

What happened to all those laptops that were stolen when Mad Albright led your organization?

[hedgetrimmer]

OAS is an international organization similar to NATO, the UN, etc.

Not like NATO.

[kabar]

The operative word is similar. Both are multilateral organizations. Check out Chapters one and two of the OAS Charter. "An act of aggression against one American State is an act of aggression against all the other American States;