“answering questions when you’ve failed to communicate is a better response than ridiculing those who have tried to decipher your meaning in spite of it’s flaws.”
Please point me to a question I’ve not answered and I’ll be glad to answer it.
Well, here are a few from early on, with your non-responses:
“I wouldn’t expect to find much domestic info about the United States at the Department of State’s web site. What sort of information were you hoping to learn?” - Good question HAL9000. A good place to see how we expect the world to recognize the United States, and it basically doesnt.
“So what does that have to do with amnesty?” - Are you serious? Surely you didnt read. If you did, then I cant help you.
“OAS = amnesty?” - Yes, you are proving yourself to be extremely dense and thus far incapable of reading.
“I dont understand your comment. Why should the State Department list the US on the Country list?” - Ok, then Ill use your argument. Why is the US listed with OAS at all? Are we confused about who we do relations with?
“I might not be the brightest bulb amongst the group but why would it be necessary to link back to itself from state.gov’s page?” - For some, it will flip the light. I could have picked 20 other scenarios depending on the crowd
After that it seems people stopped asking you questions. BTW, I didn’t need these questions answered, I was just pointing out that your responses seemed designed to be ridiculing rather than informative.