Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RachelFaith
One more good example of why we need to repeal the 17th Amendment.

I hear this all the time, but without the 17th, the senators would have even more layers between themselves and the people.

Politicians electing other politicians is just not a good idea in the corrupt political world we live in today.

99 posted on 06/15/2007 1:51:47 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta
The 17th Amendment passed in 1911. It was precisely after that passage that the power,size,budget etc of the federal government exploded and has kept growing since. Now we have a 2.9 trillion dollar annual federal budget, the federal government doing thousands of things they shouldn't be doing and a hundreds of very hight taxes. Many of these laws and government agencies are unconstitutional and Senators do not listen to the will of the people today as we can see with the Amnesty bill.

Before the 17th Amendment passed in 1911 America was basically a free, limited government country,with very low rates of taxation, much lower and fewer taxes than we have today. and people didn't have the Internet then. Now that people are more informed because of the Internet can you imaging how much greater America and our civilization would be if we repealed 17th Amendment and stopped this horrible Amnesty bill.

Liberals and Bush want to turn the U.S.A into a socialist Venezuela or a 3rd world country:

From the Washington Times:Bill permits 193 million more aliens from the 3rd world

371 posted on 06/16/2007 10:29:53 PM PDT by Democrat_media (If there is a need the free market will produce it. So what do we need gov for(only 3 things))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: JeffAtlanta
The 17th Amendment passed in 1911. It was precisely after that passage that the power,size,budget etc of the federal government exploded and has kept growing since. Now we have a 2.9 trillion dollar annual federal budget, the federal government doing thousands of things they shouldn't be doing and hundreds of very hight taxes( federal income tax, sales taxes, gasoline taxes,property taxes, inheritance taxes,state income taxes, social security tax, medicare tax, taxes on businesses that businesses have to pass on to consumers etc.). Many of these laws and government agencies are unconstitutional and Senators do not listen to the will of the people today as we can see with the Amnesty bill.

Before the 17th Amendment passed in 1911 America was basically a free, limited government country,with very low rates of taxation, much lower and fewer taxes than we have today. and people didn't have the Internet then. Now that people are more informed because of the Internet can you imaging how much greater America and our civilization would be if we repealed 17th Amendment and stopped this horrible Amnesty bill.

Liberals and Bush want to turn the U.S.A into a socialist Venezuela or a 3rd world country:

From the Washington Times:Bill permits 193 million more aliens from the 3rd world

372 posted on 06/16/2007 10:33:38 PM PDT by Democrat_media (If there is a need the free market will produce it. So what do we need gov for(only 3 things))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: JeffAtlanta
I hear this all the time, but without the 17th, the senators would have even more layers between themselves and the people.

Exactly what pull do folks have on the very rich, like Teddy "the swimmer" Kennedy, or Lautenberg? The Senate has become a rich man's game. It's almost impossible to combine enough small contributions to run for the senate. So, we have either very rich Senators, or union supported Senators.

The founders had it right. By building a layered approach to electing Senators, you reduce the problem of mobocracy and demagoguery in the election of Senators from a large state. The very size of the constituent body voting for one Senator renders the individual voter impotent. The fact that each state legislator needs to win an individual district, means that it's easier to unseat a Senator. You only need to get 51% of the votes in 51%of the districts to turn things over far enough to unseat a Senator. Thus, without the 17th amendment, Senators had to be much more careful about what they did. If they ticked off the wrong 26% of the electorate, they could be out of a job.

It's a lot harder to get 51% of a state aroused to dump a Senator, as the Senator merely has to pay off a few percent of the moderates to keep his seat in a challenge. It's also much easier to cheat in a state-wide election, as a few rotten districts can provide enough swing votes to ensure election.

397 posted on 06/23/2007 12:46:38 PM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard work to be cynical enough in this age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson