Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: de meanr
the Senate was to be more deliberative

Not really. That's just a conceit that senators have adopted for themselves. The Senate was designed to represent the interests of the State governments vis-a-vis the federal government. Since direct election began, the Senate actually has no particular reason for being, or defined role other than limited "advice and consent" and ratification-type actions.

182 posted on 06/15/2007 2:50:02 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard

They are the US “House of Lords” looking down on us common folk.


188 posted on 06/15/2007 2:53:22 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (This Amnesty Bill is the work of an Activist Executive Branch! Writing their own laws!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

To: hinckley buzzard

” The Senate was designed to represent the interests of the State governments vis-a-vis the federal government. “

You have a point about the Senate being more delibrative than the House only in its own collective mind. However, the 17th amendment was passed in an effort to make the Senate more responsive to the people. The House has always been more responsive to the people.

I agree with you that “more deliberative” is an affectation the Senate has assumed.


213 posted on 06/15/2007 3:49:38 PM PDT by de meanr (Hunter / Thompson 08 - Fear and Loathing in DC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson