It’s been shown to reduce the occurence of carcinoma of the penis to essentially nothing, to minimize the spread of STDs, and to prevent infection. Sounds like a good thing in my book.
You may want to read this
The reason the practice was started in the first place was to make it difficult to masturbate - link
Mutilating baby boys is one of the worst medical practices still perpetuated today. If you are considering doing this at least just wait until your son is old enough to understand the consequences.
yeah. right. I'll take my chances. ooops, already "mutilated" the little one.
I love it when the people that don't get their kid circumcised come in with infections, cause they don't know or care to pull down the foreskin...or if it gets inflamed get phimosis and then need to have some forceps crammed into the opening in order to dilate the meatus.
There are problems with both sides... why not just let those choose and leave it at that.
Sounds like the doc may have used the "plastibell" and instead of tying off the foreskin he slipped and ligated the penis. That would lead to retention, infection and death.
a previous poster was right, without the path report, nobody knows.
Didn't stop ME! Ha!
uhhh, did I just type that out loud?