Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/13/2007 2:05:06 PM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PajamaTruthMafia

Hmm.. I thought Apple software didn’t have bugs.


2 posted on 06/13/2007 2:08:44 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

Pfft. Ok.


3 posted on 06/13/2007 2:09:21 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper (It looks like one of those days when one nuke is just not enough-- Lt. Col. Mitchell, SG-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

“Larholm agreed. “Given that Apple has had a lousy track record with security on OS X, in addition to a hostile attitude towards security researchers, a lot of people are expecting to see quite a number of vulnerabilities targeted towards this new Windows browser.””

The popular attitude of some pro-Mac folks is that there are no security risks associated with Macs.


5 posted on 06/13/2007 2:10:56 PM PDT by Disturbin (Goverment is not the solution to any problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
"...in the Windows version of Safari Apple"

That explains that.
13 posted on 06/13/2007 2:49:26 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
I found this on PC mag this morning and tried to post it here, but FR will not allow PC Mag content on the web site.

I installed Safari on my Vista desktop and XP laptop the day it was released. I’m using Safari right now on my laptop, nice program, but not nearly as customizable as IE or Firefox. I had to uninstall it from my Vista machine as it would not display any text in the title bar, address bar, drop down menus or even on the web page. definitely buggy.

14 posted on 06/13/2007 2:59:58 PM PDT by SolitaryMan (Two types of ships...Submarines and Targets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

That’s why they call it a beta version.

I won’t be getting it until it goes final and probably, also, one revision past final. Then it will be stable and holes will be plugged.

Windows hasn’t had a Safari browser before and thus it will always have bugs when it’s first worked out in a new OS environment (i.e., Windows).

It’s going to be necessary for Safari on Windows because of Safari being necessary for the iPhone and how developers will be able to work with iPhone. Thus, they are coming out with it now, to get ready for it.

It’s not just going to be Apple Macintosh people who get iPhones, but Windows people who get it, too.

Regards,
Star Traveler


16 posted on 06/13/2007 3:28:45 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
Safari loads faster than Firefox, but each time it starts it insists on trying to connect to this or that IP number. No program should try to connect to the internet without asking the user whether it's okay to do so.

Also, the tab text and status bar text are too small and don't seem to be scalable. And the gray background color of the tab bar and the status bar is too dark.

20 posted on 06/13/2007 3:46:36 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

I skimmed the headline..initially I thought it was about mutant tse-tse flies infecting tourists on photo-safaris in Africa..


22 posted on 06/13/2007 3:48:54 PM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

I have access to the apple version of safari and I tried the windows version the other day. I don’t find it all that intuitive and the claim that it is faster than explorer seems dubious - on some pages it is very, very slow.


42 posted on 06/13/2007 5:28:09 PM PDT by Oystir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

Isn’t this a beta and not an actual supported release? You expect a lot more bugs in betas. I’m sure they will be gone for the real version.


61 posted on 06/14/2007 5:44:53 AM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
Apple released an update this morning that should resolve the issues that have come to light.

72 posted on 06/14/2007 11:21:45 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1234; 50mm; 6SJ7; Abundy; Action-America; af_vet_rr; afnamvet; akatel; Alexander Rubin; Amadeo; ...
8 bugs found in Beta Safari 3.0... PING!

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

95 posted on 06/14/2007 10:57:45 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
Danish researcher Thor Larholm wrapped up Safari's opening day with the most damaging disclosure of all: a remote execution vulnerability accompanied by proof-of-concept exploit code. That code -- Windows Safari users can click here for a demo -- could be used to hijack the PC, said Larholm, who plucked the vulnerability from the browser and built the exploit in just two hours.

Do these browsers run as root? If so that's the fundamental problem.

104 posted on 06/15/2007 12:23:12 AM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
Larholm agreed. "Given that Apple has had a lousy track record with security on OS X . . .

He's living on Bizarro world were 0 virii = bad security.

111 posted on 06/15/2007 5:25:10 AM PDT by Tribune7 (A bleeding heart does nothing but ruin the carpet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson