Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy

I attended a Madison Forum Luncheon meeting today where Heath Garret- Johnny Isakson’s chief of staff- was our guest speaker.

Keep in mind, please, that Heath is also a fellow member of Madison Forum, along with D A King- Dustin Inman Society.

Make no bones about it folks- they are hellbent and determined to get this bill through. They still want to afgue the definition of Amnesty, and try and tell us that the Dems are in control— if we don’t pass this bil— then we will end up with something WORSE. GRRRRRRRRRR!

They claim we will have “status quo”— what they don’t understand is that even status quo is better than just making these folks legal residents- they WILL bankrupt our states with social services, etc....they WILL!

Anyway- not to remember— after Heath’s 30 minute spin on La Bill— D A King was the first to address him. D A King got an OVERWHELMING applause- Heath did NOT!

ALso—VERY IMPORTANT NOTE— Heath actually discussed the SPP (Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America- aka the North American Union.)

I asked him if Johnny Isakson supported the SPP plan, and if not- what did he plan to do, to STOP it.

SPECIAL NOTE HERE!

When I did so, someone in the crowd said, “huh?”

Heath looked up and responded- “North American Union.”
He said that Johnny supported “some parts” of “SPP”....

NOTE- THIS IS NOT A CONSPIRACY! IT IS REALITY FOLKS!

I told him his best bet was to NOT support the SPP — and if there was anything he liked about the plan and wanted to implement— then he should go about implementing it in an open and honest way- SEPERATE from the SPP plan.

He answered that this was a good point.

Anyway— Just wanted to give you all the heads up— I will be writing about this whole thing later this week.....


4 posted on 06/11/2007 6:05:43 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (UNASHAMEDLY AMERICAN MADE and an AMERICA LOVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eeevil conservative

“”They claim we will have “status quo”—””

This line has been spreading, I think it originated with McCain. “Status quo” bad, “change” is good, any change. A false dilemma, if you want the laws enforced, support this bill.

It’s illogical, but effective on some I think.


9 posted on 06/11/2007 6:10:00 PM PDT by Shermy ( Kyl's flip-flop is bigger than all of John Kerry's combined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: eeevil conservative
“North American Union.”

President Bush's schizophrenic behavior would sure be explained clearly by this NAU and SPP.
Would someone please abide by and defend the G.d. Constitution?

10 posted on 06/11/2007 6:11:22 PM PDT by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: eeevil conservative

Thanks for the update.

You might want to start a vanity thread with this.


13 posted on 06/11/2007 6:15:31 PM PDT by Gvl_M3 (Sometimes, you have to stand up for yourself, even if it doesn't look "Compassionate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson