Replies

You are on the new side here (sign up date)?

New side? I'm not sure what you are trying to insinuate, but I'll spell some of it for you.

I am not a supporter of Nazi's new or old. I abhor racism (hating someone specifically because of their race). I abhor evil and institutions that support it. Islam is one of those institutions.

There are many other institutions which I abhor (Moveon.org, Democratic Party, any group that supports abortion, etc.), but they are not what the War on Terror is about. While these groups aid the Islamic terrorists in their constant hate of America and our freedoms, they are NOT our primary enemy in the War on Terror.

While I abhor Islam the religion, I don't hate all Muslims or all Arabs. I can even believe that the violent part of Islam is only about 30% of all Muslims, but they are the ruling part which keeps the "peaceful" Muslims in line.

I have had face to face discussions with Muslims about their religion and have come to the conclusion that "peaceful" Muslims are either ignorant of their own religion (just like many Catholics are of their religion), or they are intentionally lying to deceive. Either way, Islam is a seed of evil. You destroy Islam and the "peaceful" Muslims would still live in peace, but the violent Muslims would be destroyed.

Just like in WWII, the Japaneses fanatics moral was only broke when they realized they worshiped a false god (emperor). So too, must the Islamic fanatics be stopped. When Mecca and Medina are turned to glass, the fanatics will realize two things...1)allah is false at worst weak at best, because he can't even protect his own 'holy' cities. 2)One of the pillars of Islam will be destroyed because no-one will be able to do the Hadj anymore. If you can't do the hadj, good luck in getting those virgins.

Now about my sign up date....I've been a lurker to FR since the Clinton/Lewinsky scandals. It was only a few years ago, that I got brave enough to try to engage with others on FR.

Now, if you think I'm some kind of mole or troll, then you have not read many of my posts. I could try to ping some of the Freepers I have talked with if you really want some references.

Finally, I have been open and frank with you (and sarcastic), however I don't feel that you have been as open with me. I sense you are either Muslim or have Muslim friends, and that's fine, but come out and say so.

Also, those references to Nazi's are a side issue at best. Nazi's have been around in America since the end of WWII. The closest they have come to terrorism is in their connection to OKC, but that info is flimsy at best. Calling Nazi's one of the enemies of the War on Terror would be as ridiculous as calling the Bloods or the Crips enemies of the United States in the War on Terror.

As a side note to the top paragraph, I believe Bush made a mistake by calling it a War on Terror. Terror has been, and will always exist. It is used by many different groups (neo-nazi's, bloods, crips, democrats, mafia, IRS, etc.) but we aren't at War against Terror. We are at War with Islamic terrorists. So a much better title would have been the War on Islamic Terrorism. Bush's broad title leads to ridiculous conclusions like the one you are trying to foist onto me.

Sincerely

When I pointed out the newness of your sign up date, I didn’t mean it as a derogatory. I was pointing out, you may not have seen the threads we have created that tied the anti war movements, people, actions together with Soros money and the progressive democrats.

I didn’t read your post 88. It is long and I’m on my way out the door. But, if you are interested in some older threads, here are a few good ones:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1209454/posts
Vets refuse to forgive Kerry for antiwar acts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/854062/posts
Exposing the Anti-War Movement, Part I: MoveOn.org (You Don’t Know Jack!)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1038294/posts
PROOF THAT DEMOCRATS = SOCIALISM / COMMUNISM

I have had face to face discussions with Muslims about their religion and have come to the conclusion that "peaceful" Muslims are either ignorant of their own religion (just like many Catholics are of their religion), or they are intentionally lying to deceive. Either way, Islam is a seed of evil. You destroy Islam and the "peaceful" Muslims would still live in peace, but the violent Muslims would be destroyed.

That's the conclusion that I've come to as well. "Peaceful" Muslims are that way in spite of, not because of, Islam. There are good and bad people in every culture. The problem with Islamic culture is that a Muslim who opposes the use of violence to advance Islam is an apostate in the eyes of real Muslims