Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Beast of Omaha' weeps as he recalls slaughter of thousands on beach
Scotsman ^ | 6/6/04 | Murdo MacLeod

Posted on 06/11/2007 12:17:14 AM PDT by LibWhacker

FOR Hein Severloh the ‘Longest Day’ meant nine hours constantly machine-gunning American soldiers as they attempted to land on Omaha Beach.

One image still brings tears to his eyes. A young American had run from his landing craft and sought cover behind a concrete block. Severloh, then a young lance-corporal in the German army in Normandy, aimed his rifle at the GI. He fired and hit the enemy square in the forehead. The American’s helmet flew away and rolled into the sea, his chin sank to his chest and he collapsed dead on the beach.

Tormented by the memory, Severloh now weeps at the thought of the unknown soldier’s death.

Severloh was safe in an almost impregnable concrete bunker overlooking the beach. He had an unimpeded view of the oncoming Allied forces. He was the last German soldier firing, and may have accounted for about 3,000 American casualties, almost three-quarters of all the US losses at Omaha. The Americans came to know him as the Beast of Omaha.

He had been saved from the waves of Allied bombing by the poor weather. The US aircrews were worried that if they allowed their bombs to fall too soon they might destroy their own landing ships. As they flew over they lingered before releasing their weapons, meaning the bombs often landed far behind the Nazi bunkers.

The Germans joked that the ‘Amis’ - their slang for the US forces - had merely bombed French cows and farmers rather than the German installations.

Alerted by the bombers, Severloh and the 29 others in his bunker rushed to their firing holes and prepared for the onslaught. Severloh, then just 20, gasped when he saw the ocean. He was confronted by what seemed to be a wall of Allied ships. He said: "My God. How am I going to get out of this mess?"

The veteran explained: "What could I do? I just thought that I was never going to make it to the rear. I thought that I was going to shoot for my very life. It was them or me - that is what I thought."

As the landing ships neared the beach, Severloh listened to the final orders from his commander, Lieutenant Berhard Frerking. They wanted to stop the Americans while they were still in the water and could not move easily. But if he fired too soon - while the soldiers were still some way out in the water - he risked missing them.

Frerking explained: "You must open fire when the enemy is knee-deep in the water and is still unable to run quickly."

Severloh had seen little action before. His previous stint on the Eastern Front had been cut short by tonsillitis. But he was anything but enthusiastic. Severloh said: "I never wanted to be in the war. I never wanted to be in France. I never wanted to be in that bunker firing a machine gun.

"I saw how the water sprayed up where my machine gun bursts landed, and when the small fountains came closer to the GIs, they threw themselves down. Very soon the first bodies were drifting in the waves of the rising tide. In a short time, all the Americans down there were shot."

He fired for nine hours, using up all the 12,000 machine-gun rounds. The sea turned red with the blood from the bodies. When he had no more bullets for the machine-gun, he started firing on the US soldiers with his rifle, firing off another 400 rifle rounds at the terrified GIs.

A leading German historical expert of the Second World War, Helmut Konrad Freiherr von Keusgen, believes Severloh may have accounted for 3,000 of the 4,200 American casualties on the day.

Severloh is less sure about the number, but said: "It was definitely at least 1,000 men, most likely more than 2,000. But I do not know how many men I shot. It was awful. Thinking about it makes me want to throw up. I almost emptied an entire infantry landing craft. The sea was red around it and I could hear an American officer shouting hysterically in a loudspeaker."

Lt-col Stuart Crawford, formerly of the Royal Tank Regiment, and a defence consultant, said it was entirely possible that a single German soldier had killed so many GIs.

He said: "I have fired that machine-gun. I did it as part of my training, and it has an extremely high rate of fire. He was in a position which was almost impervious to the weapons which the Americans could bring to bear on him. The Americans made the mistake of not landing tanks with the first wave of troops, so they had no support or protection."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: beach; beast; beastofomaha; dday; longestday; milhist; omaha; slaughter; weeps; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last
To: fabian
It is just a shame that a large group of Germany soldiers were not willing to turn on a manical Hitler seeing that he was taking over sovereign countries and leading them all to utter ruin. Just one platoon, division or whatever march on Hilters headquarters secretly and quickly. Easy for me to write, but a very good idea.

You should study moer history. There were a few bomb plots against Hitler led by some very high level officers.

81 posted on 06/11/2007 8:42:22 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Killing all of your enemies without mercy is the only sure way of sleeping soundly at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I just got back from a visit to Normandy. Omaha and Utah were the most treacherous. Omaha is a wide flat beach below a hill. It was obvious that the Germans were able to pick our boys off like they were in a shooting gallery. I wonder if there may have been a better way to invade instead of storming the beaches on foot?


82 posted on 06/11/2007 8:47:25 AM PDT by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I was there in 2004. Started off in Bayeux, went to Arromanches, Point du Hoc, the American cemetary in Coleville Sur Mer, and finished off in St. Mere Eglise. An absolutely amazing trip- and you’re right, it really does render one speechless. I’d go again in an instant.


83 posted on 06/11/2007 8:47:47 AM PDT by SoKatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Good morning.

I looked, but I didn’t see anything on how the Beast survived a battle that ended with the Allies in control of the beachhead and all Axis troops there either dead, captured or on the run to the next line of defense. Did he break contact when he ran out of ammo or did he surrender when his position was overrun?

Also, from what I’ve read the US suffered around 2,400 casualties on Omaha, many from drowning, so claiming that he alone was responsible for 3000 is a stretch to my mind.

Whatever the truth, I’m just glad I wasn’t on that beach that day.

Michael Frazier

84 posted on 06/11/2007 8:48:37 AM PDT by brazzaville (No surrender, no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Wow!


85 posted on 06/11/2007 8:50:51 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lone star annie

Knocks the wind out of you, doesn’t it? Did you get to see the American cemetary?


86 posted on 06/11/2007 8:54:46 AM PDT by SoKatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: tutstar; Nightshift

ping a ling...


87 posted on 06/11/2007 8:55:07 AM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Yeah, where his great idea left the 82nd and 101st US Airborne holding the bag when the operation went South.

I would submit that it was the British First Airborne and the Poles that got left holding the bag.

MG was unusual for a Montgomery operation - he ususally arranged for Commonwealth or other non-British troops to bear the brunt - unless he had thought that the heaviest fighting would be closest to the front lines.

88 posted on 06/11/2007 8:58:41 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DB

Cause most tanks can’t swim; even the Dual Drive (DD) Shermans couldn’t swim very well. A lot of ‘em swamped in the heavy seas.


89 posted on 06/11/2007 8:59:52 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; Clara Lou

One of the 5 (of 64 tanks) that made it to the beach, it appears. And it didn’t get off the beach.


90 posted on 06/11/2007 9:08:02 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SoKatt

Went to the American Cemetary. It was sad to see so many graves with no names.


91 posted on 06/11/2007 9:09:52 AM PDT by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Also...the British did not land at Omaha Beach.

Utah might have been worse if the first wave hadn't hit the wrong beach. The planned landing area was more heavily defended.

92 posted on 06/11/2007 9:10:39 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
I could be mistaken, but I believe more people died in the “practice” run for D Day than on the actual attack. The practice run was a complete debacle and thousands drowned or died somehow before D Day. I believe the landing craft were swamped or sunk in some way before they hit the beach. It was kept secret for decades. The controversy was brought to light when some of the dead weren’t given their “due” because they died in non combat, or some such. The military wasn’t too keen on talking about it for years.

Today, if we lose one soldier, they want investigations and somebody's head on a platter. In all previous wars, thousands were thrown at the enemy with no thought it may have been done better. We wasted more people on a Korean hill than in a year in Iraq. Douglas MacArthur was a hero, and Peter Pace can't even get a hearing.

93 posted on 06/11/2007 9:14:15 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: lone star annie

“Here rests in honored glory a soldier known only to God”. Makes me tear up every time.


94 posted on 06/11/2007 9:15:42 AM PDT by SoKatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: DB

Patton was still busy selling the very IDEA of armor. Rommel showed the world how to use it, but our Army’s career trajectory was either infantry or cavalry. Patton actually risked his career even pursuing the idea of a tank being something more than an infantry support vehicle.

The irony was, once Rommel had demonstrated what was possible, Patton became indispensible.

Patton eventually trumped Rommel’s achievement, and improved it by showing the world how to coordinate air power with tank attack.

Armor was a pretty new concept.

It’s funny, now that I think about it. Doolittle got courtmarshalled for all the fuss he put up insisting you could use air to bomb ships. Patton undergoes nearly the same fate over tanks.

The power of orthodoxy.


95 posted on 06/11/2007 9:21:18 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DB
We tried to land some "swimming tanks" but they sank in the rough seas.


96 posted on 06/11/2007 9:28:08 AM PDT by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howard Jarvis Admirer
Montgomery was good at planning the set piece battle, and was successful when it developed according to plan. He was not, however, particularly successful in adapting to a dynamic situation - when things started to go wrong, he couldn't adjust on the fly.

Patton, on the other hand, was excellent on a dynamic battlefield, but his attempts at set-piece assaults (Nancy and Metz, as I recall).

Montgomery was almost always willing to let the Commonwealth troops bear the brunt of the fighting, being more judicious in his use of British troops.

97 posted on 06/11/2007 9:28:34 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

The incident was off Slapton Sands in Devon, April 1944. Two German E-Boats stumbled across a group of fully loaded and unprotected LSTs on a training exercise. About 800 US troops died.


98 posted on 06/11/2007 9:28:47 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

I too hold no ill toward this man, he did what he was asked and had to do.... I cannot imagine being in his place.

When battle becomes simply slaughter, and you keep firing anyway.... what that has to do to ones psych. For 9 hours, I am sure I would have been crying as I fired long before I ran out of ammo, and been praying to God that they just leave rather than force me to keep killing them.....


99 posted on 06/11/2007 9:35:51 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jebeier

And its things like this that drove to the creation of the laser guided munition.


100 posted on 06/11/2007 9:36:39 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson