[First, I do not do that type of dating. My expertise is in radiocarbon dating.]
Golly- didn’t see that response coming- I guess that autoimatically makes the problems that Woodmorappe exposed with radiometric dating dissapear altogether. Carry on maligning those who bring the to attention that radiometric dating has problems then coyboy
What it does not do is make the absolutely foolish comments "Woodmorappe" (and you) make regarding radiocarbon dating disappear altogether.
When will you get it through your head that neither "Woodmorappe" (nor you) have a clue about radiocarbon dating?
And if I can show, as I have, that neither "Woodmorappe" (nor you) have a clue about radiocarbon dating, that implies that neither of you necessarily has a clue about radiometric dating either.
Here are some links for those willing to learn:
ReligiousTolerance.org Carbon-14 Dating (C-14): Beliefs of New-Earth CreationistsRadiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective by Dr. Roger C. Wiens.
This site, BiblicalChronologist.org has a series of good articles on radiocarbon dating.
Are tree-ring chronologies reliable? (The Biblical Chronologist, Vol. 5, No. 1)
Tree Ring and C14 DatingHow does the radiocarbon dating method work? (The Biblical Chronologist, Vol. 5, No. 1)
How precise is radiocarbon dating?
Is radiocarbon dating based on assumptions?
Has radiocarbon dating been invalidated by unreasonable results?
Radiocarbon WEB-info Radiocarbon Laboratory, University of Waikato, New Zealand.