I’ve seen that site before and investigated it further and No I’m sorry- He’s not ‘debunked’ His work and findings are commonly admitted by scientists- Your site is really nothign more than a bitter old man playing symantics games- His arguments are deceitful and attribute sentiments to Woodmorappe’s findings that Woodmorappe never intended- the very first link in your site proves htis out splendidly and exposes the petty argumentative nature of those who can’t stomach folks who investigate matters more fully and find that there are indeed problems that are being systematically hidden from the public- Henke’s petty arguments can be reffuted point by point- but really, what good will it do? Just a waste of time because people like Heneke and those who beleive him could care less that they are being less than honest and will roll on like a runaway locomotive with no cares in the world other than maligning those htey dissagree with with nothign but fluff arguments- Henke takes a few fairly benign points made by Woodmorappe and pretends Woodmorappe is trying to rely solely on points that aren’t actually of much relevence to his argument and FACTs as a whole- Henke totally ignores the more relevent points because they would undermine his petty nit-picking arguments- but nice try. Woodmorappe’s work stands on it’s own merrits and anyone can try to malign anyone simply by nit-picking and assigning sentiments that were never intentioned by the author of the work they are brow-beating. This tactic works well in forums where people don’t care about the facts, and don’t care that the one maligning is being deceitful- but as mentioned, the work of folks like morappe stand up in more intellectual and honest situations and that’s all that matters.
And the fruitfly experiments have been going on for nearly a century trying to produce higher speices through mutations- read more about it here: http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/10mut10.htm