Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trade deficit drops in April as exports climb to all-time high
AP via the Sioux City Journal ^ | June 10, 2007 | unattributed

Posted on 06/10/2007 6:44:11 AM PDT by 1rudeboy

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The trade deficit dropped sharply in April as strong overseas demand pushed American exports to an all-time high.

While the Bush administration hailed the unexpectedly large improvement as a sign that an export boom was continuing, critics noted the imbalance with China rose in April, underscoring what they said was an urgent need for Congress to take action to punish China for unfair trade practices.

The Commerce Department reported Friday that the gap between what America sells abroad and what it imports totaled $58.5 billion in April, a 6.2 percent decline from the March deficit.

Exports edged up 0.2 percent to a record $129.5 billion, reflecting strong sales of soybeans and other farm products, commercial aircraft and industrial machinery. Imports fell 1.9 percent to $188 billion, reflecting big declines in imports of foreign cars, televisions and clothing and a small dip in America's foreign oil bill.

"With each new trade agreement reached and implemented, barriers around the world to U.S. exports fall and opportunities for export growth are enhanced," said U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab, who is leading the administration's effort to win congressional support for new free trade deals with South Korea and three Latin American nations.

On Wall Street, the Dow Jones industrial averaged surged 157.66 points to close at 13,424.39, snapping a three-day losing streak and allowing investors to recoup losses incurred during a week when interest-rate worries overtook the markets.

The overall improvement in the trade deficit was larger than had been expected and was a hopeful sign, analysts said, that the deficit for all of 2007 should narrow after posting records for five consecutive years.

They attributed the improvement to stronger growth overseas and the weaker value of the dollar against many currencies, which makes American products more competitive in overseas markets.

Trade subtracted a full percentage point from economic growth in the first three months of this year, when the economy slowed to a barely discernible 0.6 percent growth rate.

Analysts said the new trade report, which showed slightly improved deficit figures in previous months, should help boost economic growth as measured by the gross domestic product to closer to 1 percent in the first quarter while the big narrowing in the April deficit should help support a rebound in GDP growth to around 2.5 percent or better in the second quarter.

Through the first four months of this year, the deficit is running at an annual rate of $705.9 billion, a drop of 6.9 percent from last year's record $758.5 billion imbalance.

However, the deficit with China widened to $19.4 billion in April, the worst showing since January, and through the first four months of the year is running 11.9 percent higher than the pace of a year ago when the gap with China set a record at $232.6 billion.

The deficit with China has gotten increasing attention in Congress, where critics are pushing various bills that would impose economic sanctions to punish China for what they contend are unfair trading practices such as currency manipulation and copyright piracy.

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said that the failure to crack down on China and other countries had led to "out of control trade deficits" and a resulting loss of well-paying manufacturing jobs.

He said a recent report by the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal think tank, found that America's soaring trade deficit with China from 1997 through 2006 had displaced production that could have supported 2.17 million U.S. jobs.

The administration, trying to head off a protectionist backlash, has launched a new series of high-level talks with the Chinese. The latest round of those discussions two weeks ago failed to yield any breakthroughs in the main area of contention, China's undervalued currency, but Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said this week that he remained committed to the discussions.

For April, exports of American agricultural products set a record at $6.7 billion, reflecting strong increases in shipments of soybeans, nuts and meat. Exports of industrial materials and consumer goods also set records.

On the import side, the foreign oil bill edged down a slight 0.2 percent to $24.9 billion on a seasonally adjusted basis even though the average price of a barrel of crude oil rose to $57.28, the highest level since last September.

The deficit with Canada, America's largest trading partner, rose by 7.4 percent to $5.8 billion but the imbalance with Mexico, the other partner in the North American Free Trade Agreement, fell by 22.3 percent to $5.3 billion. The imbalance with the European Union was up 17.1 percent to $9 billion.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; imports
I don't remember if the oil price run-up began in April or May, but it will bear watching as it affects these figures.
1 posted on 06/10/2007 6:44:15 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Wal-Mart, Home Depot - It’s made in China, China, China. Always cheap in quality too. I’m for free trade but not with China. I would support a 100% ban on any consumables from China - no food, vitamins, medicine, etc. They are becoming a critical supplier in our basic necessities and they are chicoms.

2 posted on 06/10/2007 6:57:06 AM PDT by RushingWater (Pres. Bush honors Mexican sovereignty over our own - Pardon Ramos/Campeon/Hernandez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushingWater

I shop at Wal-Mart maybe twice a week, and have no trouble finding non-Chinese products to buy. Ditto for Home Depot—in the past few weeks I’ve purchased plumbing equipment, a bbq, and lawn care equipment. (That’s not to say Chinese products are not sold at those establishments, just that one needs to be diligent).

3 posted on 06/10/2007 7:01:04 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
critics noted the imbalance with China rose in April, underscoring what they said was an urgent need for Congress to take action to punish China for unfair trade practices.

Their "unfair trade practices" can also be seen as a net subsidy for American consumption - a subsidy that they pay for (it puts them in the game). To ameliorate the issues causing concern for free trade critics, America needs a shift in its tax policy - the federal government needs to move from taxing income to taxing consumption. Simply, if it is built in America, our current tax system exerts a massive penalty which is carried to the consumer price; if it is built in China, this penalty is absent. This is antithetical to a free market.

A consumption tax is compatible with free markets, free trade, AND is not inimical to domestic industry. The losers are instead big-government control freaks of all stripes (no more mandatory reporting of income to the federal government = sad nanny-staters), tax parasites (compliance, etc), and importers. The chicoms are not "cheating on trade" - the federal government is desperate enough to retain its levers of control that it is willing to shoot domestic industry in the back. Though the overall domestic manufacturing picture is not all that bad, it would be incredibly stronger if a more appropriate tax policy was in place. But don't hold your breath.

4 posted on 06/10/2007 7:21:36 AM PDT by M203M4 (Vote Fruity Giuliani or the terrists will win! Abortion & gun control = price for freedumb!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
That's what ticks me off. We have a corporate income tax system that places our domestic manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage (globally), and encourages off-shoring. It is only the strength of our economy that disguises the problem and allows our politicians to posture about tariffs and such.

If we revamped our corporate income tax system, U.S. companies would become unbeatable.

5 posted on 06/10/2007 7:26:44 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

It’s not just income tax. Employment/payroll taxes are horrific, and one could consider the minimum wage....

6 posted on 06/10/2007 7:29:17 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RushingWater
They are becoming a critical supplier in our basic necessities and they are chicoms.

Only because Americans, myself not included, buy their crap. It's a tough row to hoe, but believe it or not you can still find American made substitutes for cheap Chinese crap if you try hard enough.

Cheap stuff is rarely good and good stuff is rarely cheap.

7 posted on 06/10/2007 7:38:01 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Just the facts ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson