Since he built it back up after 9/11, and won two straight congressional victories, I guess he can wreck it a little. Funny there is no vitriol here directed at Ronald Reagan who signed an amnesty bill in 1986.
Uh, he wasn’t at war with radical Muslims who killed 3000 of our people, and Ronald Reagan did not bitch slap his base by calling them anti-American fear mongers!
“no vitriol here directed at Ronald Reagan”
We learned a lot from that “amnesty” and are not going to be fooled twice into thinking Congress has ANY intention of border enforcement. Number 2, I hope to think we on FR would not speak ill of the dead and those who are not able to defend themselves. Do you think we are DUmmies? :)
Good catch.
What would be the point in expressing vitriol for Reagan’s amnesty. What could have been done about that should have been done 21 years ago.
This is the here and now. What’s going on sucks and we’re stuck in the middle of it. B!tching about Reagan’s faux paux is useless.
“Funny there is no vitriol here directed at Ronald Reagan who signed an amnesty bill in 1986.”
Now you’re going after Ronnie? LOL.
Funny there is no vitriol here directed at Ronald Reagan who signed an amnesty bill in 1986.
There was no Internet and no FR along with other (and no Rush I believe, could be wrong)conservative sites then. I don’t believe immigration was the issue then that it is now either. We tended to believe our politicians back then when they told us the bill would regulate illegal immigration. If it were Reagan proposing this bill now he would receive the same scepticism Bush has received.