To: TigerLikesRooster
I wonder about this. A well managed derivatives portfolio hedges against interest rate risk. Most banks I am familiar have a very sophisticated system to manage derivatives and it is not static, it is adjusted daily.
I think that China, with almost a TRILLION dollars in bad loans impacting their banking system is a much higher risk.
In any event, I would not invest in China or Europe for that matter.
3 posted on
06/09/2007 3:06:40 AM PDT by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
To: Jimmy Valentine
Where would you invest? V’s wife.
4 posted on
06/09/2007 3:35:38 AM PDT by
ventana
To: Jimmy Valentine
The author’s contention seems a bit far fetched. He links loans, debt securities and hedge funds and then assumes any sudden change would result in a “domino effect” resulting in the collapse of the whole European credit market.
The more likely scenario is that investors who happily plunged their money on the promise of 20% returns will get a rude awakening that “past performance is no indicator of future performance”.
6 posted on
06/09/2007 4:42:42 AM PDT by
baltoga
To: Jimmy Valentine
I think the weak link in derivatives is that the liquidity needed in the event of a problem, is not always there.
Assume that Turkey has a problem, so you sell your Danish CMO (collateralized mortgage obligation) holdings - you are dependent on there being another buyer, able to buy up the entirety of your holdings at the price you want. If you have a lot of Danish CMOs, the market might not be able to absorb all the ones you want to sell, meaning either that you will not sell them , or will have to sell them for less.
7 posted on
06/09/2007 6:03:13 AM PDT by
ikka
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson