| Boycotting the Jews in Britain |  |
FrontPageMagazine.com | June 7, 2007
Posted on 06/07/2007 8:13:46 AM PDT by SJackson
BBC reporter Alan Johnston has been held since March 26 by a terrorist group in Gaza, where he had been the last international journalist to keep living and working. He appeared last Thursday in a video wearing an orange sweatshirt and reading a prepared statement. Meanwhile British soldiers are under attack by Muslim and Arab terrorists in Afghanistan and Iraq, and fifteen British sailors were recently kidnapped and held in harsh conditions for two weeks by Iran.
Closer to home, a survey found one-quarter of British Muslims expressing sympathy for the London bombers of July 7, 2005, and British intelligence estimates that about 16,000 of them are capable of carrying out such attacks themselves. Indeed, last August 11 the left-wing Guardian reported that British Muslim “suicide bombers were within days of blowing up 12 passenger jets above five US cities in an unprecedented terrorist attack designed to commit [quoting intelligence sources] ‘mass murder on an unimaginable scale.’”
Yet Britain’s University and College Union, made up of university academics, as well as other groups have figured out who their real enemies are . . . the Jews.
Last Wednesday, the UCU voted 158-99 to “circulate the full text of the Palestinian boycott call to all branches” and to “encourage members to consider the moral implications of existing and proposed links with Israeli academic institutions.” British journalists’, doctors’, and architects’ unions have also recently proposed boycotts of Israel, the Anglican Church has decided to divest from companies cooperating with it, and later this month UNISON, Britain’s largest trade union, is to vote on cutting economic ties with the Jewish state.
The UCU’s resolution “notes that Israel’s 40-year occupation has seriously damaged the fabric of Palestinian society through annexation, illegal settlement, collective punishment and restriction of movement” and “deplores the denial of educational rights for Palestinians by invasions, closures, checkpoints, curfews, and shootings and arrests of teachers, lecturers and students.” It also “condemns the complicity of Israeli academia in the occupation, which has provoked a call from Palestinian trade unions for a comprehensive and consistent international boycott of all Israeli academic institutions.”
The resolution does not include a single mention of: Palestinian terrorism against Israel; Israel’s total withdrawal from Gaza including the destruction of decades-old Israeli villages and even the exhuming of all Israeli graves; the 1993 Oslo agreement and Israel’s transfer of civil administration in the West Bank (and Gaza) to a Palestinian government that Israel created; Israel’s 2000 offer of full statehood to the Palestinians; or the fact that all universities now existing in the West Bank and Gaza have been established since Israel took control of these territories in 1967.
Gone, wiped from the record; in the UCU resolution, none of this ever existed. Israel engages in “invasions, closures, checkpoints, curfews, and shootings and arrests” out of sheer evil and malice; it has never witnessed waves of suicide terrorists blowing bus passengers, café patrons, and hotel guests to bits, thousands of rockets falling on towns and farms, or genocidal exhortations on official Palestinian TV—all of it Orwelled out of reality.
The UCU does, however, call for “organis[ing] a UK-wide campus tour for Palestinian academic/educational trade unionists” and “actively encourage[s] . . . branches to create direct educational links with Palestinian educational institutions and to help set up nationally sponsored programmes for teacher exchanges, sabbatical placements and research.” It does so at a time when the Palestinian Authority is ruled by a popularly elected government of Hamas, which is officially defined as a terrorist organization by the European Union, proudly claims credit for rocket attacks on civilians, and whose charter openly calls for Israel’s destruction and the killing of all Jews.
Recently Prof. Steven Weinberg of the University of Texas, a Nobel Prize winner in physics, canceled a speaking engagement at Imperial College in London. He said, referring to the move to boycott Israel by Britain’s National Union of Journalists, that “given the history of the attacks on Israel and the oppressiveness and aggressiveness of other countries in the Middle East and elsewhere, boycotting Israel indicate[s] a moral blindness for which it is hard to find any explanation other than anti-Semitism.”
The UCU resolution, however, states that “passivity or neutrality is unacceptable and criticism of Israel cannot be construed as anti-semitic.”
No, perish the thought. Apart from the evasive use of “criticism”—what is at stake is not criticism, but boycotts—it is of course not anti-Semitic to make Israel the sole and obsessive focus of efforts at condemnation and excommunication by academics, journalists, doctors, architects, clergy, and ordinary workers at a time of ongoing genocide in Sudan and constant severe human rights abuses in the likes of Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and the Palestinian Authority itself—to go no further than the Muslim Middle East.
It is not anti-Semitism, it is just that the Jews, in their not-quite sixty years of statehood after two millennia of dispersion, have managed to create the world’s most evil society and the only one so repugnant that even its academics need to be silenced and ostracized. It is not anti-Semitism, it is just that all the problems of Arab and Muslim aggression the world over stem from that one primal sin of “Israeli occupation”; just that the Jews have somehow once again managed to poison the wells and be at the root of all evil.
And this is how the pathetic West consumes itself; how it cannot tell enemies from friends, up from down, black from white, instead turning in blind viciousness on its own most besieged frontier while grasping at the old, sure mainstay of anti-Semitism.
‘A few lefty unions do not represent Britain anymore than the ACLU represents America.’
I’m glad you got here first and saved me the trouble of shooting down these anti-British muppets who think 158 academics represent Britain.
I believe psychiartrists call it transference - criticising others instead of fixing your own problems.
Well said.
Most of the people of Britain are disgusted and the PM and parliament have condemned this.
There are nazi candidates who are running for president in America.
Since when does that make Americans nazis?
I think we must distinguish the issue of Britain and Jews on three fronts: Muslims, virulent anti-Semitism, and genteel dislike.
First, the Muslims: there is no doubt the Islamics in Britain hate the Jewish people just as God said they would. And much of the violent pogrpms against Jews in Britain as of 2007 are perpetuated by this group.
Virulent anti-Semitism disguised by anti-Zionism among the ethnic Europeans: I have no doubt that this group is probably not as acute as among the many in Europe. But unfortunately as Britain becomes more “European” in the EU sense, so does that sentiment converging towards their continental couterparts. The UCU and other unions’ actions are probably reflective of this group.
Genteel dislike, or uncomfort of Jewishness: it is largely distinct from the second sentiment, but they do feed from one another at times. No doubt it is very widespread in Britain left and right and I have seen one common refrain among British litatures on the issue of Jews: “Jewish cultural influence runs deep in the United States - everywhere I look at I see kosher, Judaism, passover. Things that I don’t see in other English-speaking countries!”, from Oscar Wide, through to 1920s and 30s (read any biographies of King George VI by British historians and note particularly chapters on his visit to the United States pre-WWII and the descriptions of the United States through contemporary British accounts quoted), even on the internet-era publications like the libertarian free-market website semizdata.net .
In sum, I don’t think the talks of Britain embracing neo-Nazism are really on the mark, but neither the sooth-sayings like Britain has always been friends to Jews that accurate either. I sense a general negative sentiment towards the Jewish people in Britain that is probably reflective of hallmarks of a post-Bible-Christian and post-Jewish-cultural-influenced society.
I wouldn’t disagree about either Muslim hatred or traditional dislike of Jews among the elite. And the long term history of Jews in England aside, there’s certainly a more recent history of conflict in the first half of the last century. I’d distinguish the boycott from simple “dislike” though. It’s an overt act, one intended to cause significant harm both to individual Israelis (Jews in some versions) and Israeli institutions and business’ by expelling them from world markets. No, it probably won’t have a significant effect, Israel is on the cutting edge of too many things in the medical and technoligical sphere, the western business and academic community won’t forgo cooperation with Israel to satisfy a group of Brits. But it goes far beyone simple distaste for Jews into the realm of action.
I think I’m with you on that one. A lot of our friends in Britain, such as a few who posted replies above, are downplaying these boycott calls calling them “just a group of wacky individuals”, this is why I have to layout the whole confusing mesh to show them it is not as isolated pranks as they suggest.
“not anti-semitism”
SURE it’s not!/s
Sheesh!!! What a bunch of bigots and idiots they are!
Ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.