Posted on 06/07/2007 5:43:52 AM PDT by dangus
Five Republicans are fighting tooth and nail to ensure the destruction of America. They are "post-nationalists," demanding open borders, free access for terrorists, and an illiterate underclass. These aren't near-sighted liberals, but fake conservatives who know full well that the havoc they will create, but they lust so badly for the blood money of a class of people who cannot wait for a slave class so poorly paid, they could not survive without massive amounts of taxpayer funds. Yes, 20 million criminals from Mexico will get free medical care and Spanish-language education instead of the Americans who paid their taxes.
Susan Collins (ME), Pete Domenici (NM), Chuck Hagel (NE), John Warner (VA), and Lindsay Graham (SC) are today committing crimes against America far greater than the Rosenbergs. (Other destoryers of America include Dick Lugar, Mel Martinez, Arlen Specter and Jon Kyl.)
Is such language over-heated? You decide:
THE "CRIMINAL PROTECTION" ACT:
Domenici, Graham, Hagel, Lugar, Martinez, Specter and Voinovich voted to allow cities to obstruct justice in the apprehension of illegal aliens who remain illegal, even under the terms of the immigration bill.
THE "TERRORIST IMPORTATION" ACT:
Larry Craig, Domenici, Graham, Hagel, Kyl, Lugar, Martinez, McCain, Specter and Voinovich voted to invite to stay in America those deemed likely to be terrorists, sex offenders, convicted gang members, drunk drivers, domestic batterers, stalkers and those already deported.
THE "IMMIGRANTS GET THE MEDICAL CARE YOU PAID FOR" ACT:
Collins, Domenici, Graham, Hagel, Kyl, Lugar, McCain, and Specter voted to permit illegal aliens to rip off the U.S. medical system by failing to maintain health coverage, while being covered by "good Samaritan" laws which require they be treated anyway.
THE TAXPAYERS FEED THE SLAVES ACT:
So much for aliens paying their fair share of taxes: Brownback, Collins, Grassley, Lugar, Specter, Smith, and Voinovich voted to allow illegal aliens to receive Earned Income Tax Credits, which turn the IRS from a collection agency into a welfare agency.
THE ACT TO REPEAT SEPTEMBER 11TH:
Cochran, Collins, Domenici, Graham, Gregg, Kyl, Lugar, McCain, Martinez, Specter, Voinovich and Warner voted to allow visa-holders free transit across our borders before the biometric tracking, delayed since 1996, is implemented. Most of the September 11 terrorists entered America legally, but were not tracked down when they became illegals because this system was not yet implemented.
THE "WHO NEEDS TO LEARN ENGLISH TO GET A JOB WHEN I CAN GET MY WELFARE IN SPANISH, ARABIC OR FARSI" ACT.
Most deceitfully, the following craven liars voted to make English the official language, but then voted to overturn those provisions, and encode into law President CLinton's multilingual mandate which will allow illegal aliens to sue any agency or shutter any government-funds-receiving organization which fails to provide services in any of 320 foreign languages: Coleman, Collins, Domenici, Hagel, Lugar, Murkowski, Snowe, Specter, Warner. These votes will allow these Senator to tell their constituents that they voted for assimilation, while they really voted to force tax payers to absorb the cost of illegal aliens refusing to assimilate.
(Vote records from NumbersUSA; rhetoric is mine.)
Yeah and Lee harvey Oswald was an ex-Marine. So what’s your point?
Just because you disagree with them about immigration policy they are traitors?
So I disagree with you about abortion does that make you the antiChrist?
Domenici et al are not helping the enemy or betraying their country. If you think so then may be we should examine your beliefs about every issue.
You’re right Graham is a J.O. as far as I’m concerned.
What just because I disagree with him about immigration I’m a bigot?
UnAmerican Traitors!
Doesn’t mean you call them a traitor - unless you want me to call you a traitor or a racist.
Linda is hardly a La Raza fanatic.
Prior to this most recent uproar I’ve never heard her making any specifically Hispanic comments.
That’s why I’m so disappointed.
I’ve heard her discuss the issue twice since her infamous column, and each time her primary focus is on the rhetoric on the other side she finds so offensive.
Some here have stated that they are offended by being called “bigots.” I am myself.
Is it such a stretch to see that someone of Hispanic ancestry might be at least equally offended by references to “20 million Mexican criminals,” when most illegal immigrants are not evil people, just people trying to make a living?
No your the traitor! You’re unAmerican racist bigot.
Now how does that sound? You like being called names when it is not true? No? Then don’t do it to others.
Don’t think Warner is running in 2008. IIRC, he has raised next to nothing in campaign donations this year.
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.asp?CID=N00002061&cycle=2006
and
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/12/AR2007041202122.html
RICHMOND, April 12 — U.S. Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.) reported Thursday that he has raised only $500 in campaign contributions during the first three months of the year, fueling speculation that he may not seek a sixth term next year.
Be my guest.
However, some facts remain, despite how much you may hate them.
There is some number of people adamantly in favor of the bill, and some number adamantly opposed. Nothing you or anyone else can say or do will sway those in either group to change.
Then there are those in the middle, who are either undecided or can possibly be convinced to change their minds. You win by convincing more of this group to move in your direction than move in the other.
Excessive rhetorical flourishes, especially those that can be perceived as racist or “mean-spirited,” may go down well with those who are already on your side, but I can guarantee you they will influence some unknown percentage of the waverers to vote the other way.
So do you want applause from those already on your side, or do you want to defeat the bill? Your choice.
I find it fascinating that since I contend that certain tactics are counter-productive, it means I must be a liberal.
ping
I think you're correct. But unfortunately that likely means the seat goes RAT. I don't know if we have an anti-amnesty candidate to run.
I saw your tag line. But George Allen is not running for the Senate in 2008.
Then you don’t know what a traitor is.
You’re just using words you don’t understand the meaning of.
Yeah, and when you return you’ll find your job backfilled with one of the “new citizens” !!!
Can't train them THAT fast Amigo...
Odd, considering it's the only crime defined in the Constitution.
Bullshit!
And unfortunately, to them everything becomes abortion, which means they alienate most Maine voters by giving only lip service to other things Mainers do care about: Smith vs. Jones on taxes? On the federal budget? On the WOT? The First Amendment? The Fourth? Fine, but first, where do Smith and Jones stand on abortion?
Basically, Collins is bulletproof unless conservatives are willing to vote for whatever tree-hugging whale mollester the Dems put up.
I heard the person who will primary Hagle on Levin last night. If he has a website we should all send him $100.
Also whom ever primaries Lyndsey!!
Gen. Baca would be a good replacement for Domenici
Bobby Jindal will be Governor by then.
I agree Landrieu,Pryor,”Redearth” Johnson and Baucus and Lautenberg should all be defeated.
Could we just throw them all out?
I'm from Alabama, I've been called untrue names my whole life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.