Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Body armor maker being investigated [Dragon Skin in Trouble]
Kansas City Star ^ | Jun. 06, 2007 | MICHAEL DOYLE

Posted on 06/06/2007 11:32:55 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty

WASHINGTON | A manufacturer of body armor is under criminal investigation for possibly making false claims, Pentagon officials said Wednesday.

Lawmakers are pressing for an independent test to determine whether the company’s vests are better than the ones U.S. troops in Iraq are wearing.

Air Force investigators said they had been investigating Pinnacle Armor of Fresno, Calif., for a year, looking into allegations the company lied about having its vests certified as safe. Pinnacle made the claim nine months before it received the federal certification, officials said.

Lawmakers from both parties accused Pinnacle’s president, Murray Neal, of hyping his product, exploiting the fears of soldiers’ families, misleading Congress and impugning the Army’s integrity.

Neal said his company’s Dragon Skin body armor was superior to the Interceptor brand the Pentagon was buying now. The Army and Marine Corps need 178,000 body armor systems for service members in Iraq and Afghanistan. Some soldiers and Marines have been paying upward of $5,000 to equip themselves with Dragon Skin.

Unlike the solid Interceptor vests, Dragon Skin uses overlapping silver dollar-sized discs. The flexible system is popular with police SWAT teams, Secret Service agents, and others.

Neal contended there was “a pattern of anti-Dragon Skin misinformation coming from the armed forces.” He said a side-by-side test of the two systems, conducted by an independent evaluator, should decide which was more effective.

“I think we can do that in short order,” agreed Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, the senior Republican member of the House Armed Services Committee.

Two members of the Senate Armed Services Committee want the Government Accountability Office to oversee body armor tests.

The Pentagon has tested equipment against certain standards, but not side by side.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dragonskin; interceptor; military
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: unspun
Kinda stopped paying attention at that point.

Your loss.

L

41 posted on 06/07/2007 9:45:57 AM PDT by Lurker (Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing small pox to plague.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

What’s odd is that I can’t find a similar PP presentation on the Interceptor test results. Have you found one?


42 posted on 06/08/2007 1:18:53 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570; Lurker
The reason I ask is because the other day on this thread where I found the link you've got in your reply, I was looking for an Interceptor presentation then.
All I found was the Interceptor Body Armor (IBA) .pdf, which is in the same reply and from the same place. It doesn't give any test results and is simply a "gloss piece".

Hey Lurker, looks like there's going to be some more tests...While Hunter subjected both Neal and Coyle to harsh questioning over their claims, the California lawmaker agreed that another round of tests is the only thing that will put the issue to rest.

43 posted on 06/08/2007 1:39:01 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty; unspun

Simple test, have the president of Pinnacle Armor stand behind his product or in this case in it.

I can’t think of a better certification.


44 posted on 06/08/2007 1:55:31 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine's brother (Crush your enemies; see them driven before youWe'rey and hear the lamentation of their women - Conan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
The military released the PP for Dragon Skin because of the media hype it’s backers had been generating in the last year.

Interceptor passed years ago but the military, as I understand it, continues to pull samples from lots and test them to make sure the 6 suppliers stay up to specs.

What is Dragon Skin so afraid of? If they’ve fixed the adhesive problem and the disks stay in place after the temperature extremes and oil treatment it should pass, right? Then they should submit another batch of 30 to the Army for testing. Why are they pushing for a head to head test without the environmental conditioning?

Buy the snake oil if you wish.

45 posted on 06/08/2007 3:32:39 AM PDT by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
An extra 20 lbs of weight is a huge, huge deal. If people don't understand that, they don't have any concept of infantry combat.

Exactly! I just love these armchair experts making proclamations based on friggin TV shows!

46 posted on 06/08/2007 3:40:45 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
I gather from your response you can't find any test results either.
The military released the PP for Dragon Skin because of the media hype it’s backers had been generating in the last year.
Wouldn't it have been prudent to have also put up the Interceptor results?

Interceptor passed years ago...continues to pull samples from lots and test them...
And the test results are...where?
And don't forget that this whole thing started because some of those batches failed their testing.

Buy the snake oil if you wish.
Up to that point I thought there might be a conversation to be had here. Now I see that I was wrong in that assumption.
Have a nice day.

47 posted on 06/08/2007 5:46:07 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
Then they should submit another batch of 30 to the Army for testing.
Oh, lest I forget...shouldn't there be an independent lab doing the testing instead of the Army or their designated lab so as to remove any hint of favoritism one way or the other?
48 posted on 06/08/2007 5:49:26 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Ah well, I can understand why there is a call for more testing.
Some more interesting reading...
Prepared Statement
Hon. Philip E. Coyle, III
Senior Advisor World Security Institute
Before the House Committee on Armed Services
Wednesday, June 6, 2007

At the end...The best way to resolve this matter would be for the US Army Test and Evaluation Command to conduct comparable side-by-side tests of both Interceptor and Dragon Skin body armor. Those tests should be overseen by an independent third party such as the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. This is what the Senate Armed Services Committee has called for, and I hope the House Armed Services will join the Senate to call for a fair, balanced, and refereed body armor testing program.
49 posted on 06/08/2007 11:35:10 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Don't get me wrong. I want our guys to have the best stuff that can be had no matter where it comes from. I want the military procurement process to be completely dedicated to finding the best possible equipment for our guys no matter what the cost.

I want that process to be untainted by any favoritism, nepotism, cronyism, or corruption.

And I want all the children of the world to join hands and sing in perfect harmony....

L

50 posted on 06/08/2007 11:47:55 AM PDT by Lurker (Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing small pox to plague.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
And I want all the children of the world to join hands and sing in perfect harmony....
Have a
and a
51 posted on 06/08/2007 11:59:10 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: philman_36; PeteB570; unspun; HamiltonJay; Lurker; Little Ray
Greetings all:

shouldn't there be an independent lab doing the testing instead of the Army or their designated lab so as to remove any hint of favoritism one way or the other?

The testimony is on C-Spam now. The independent lab biased the results in a manner inconsistent with body armor wear. And it also appears elements of the NBC enemedia division failed in it's duty to report the truth. Again.

Cheers,
OLA

52 posted on 06/10/2007 3:32:20 AM PDT by OneLoyalAmerican (Truth was the first casualty in the MSM's war on President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican

All I’ve got on C-Span now is Marlee Matlin and Tom Segev on C-Span2


53 posted on 06/10/2007 3:46:43 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican
...C-Spam...
Typo?
54 posted on 06/10/2007 3:49:18 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican

BTW, my comments were regarding the new tests to be conducted, not the old ones.


55 posted on 06/10/2007 3:51:15 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican
C-SPAN: Full Schedule
What are you watching?
56 posted on 06/10/2007 3:55:18 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
what was that Navy Seal shooting with then, in that discovery show

Head on shots are the easiest to stop. Dragonskin's problem (along with every other 'interlocking disk' style armor) is that not every shot comes in perpendicular to the vest. They don't do a good job stopping oblique shots.

As for the grenade test, the old Army flak jacket would do that, too. Stopping shrapnel is way different - and way easier - than stopping bullets.

57 posted on 06/10/2007 4:02:43 AM PDT by Terabitten (Virginia Tech Corps of Cadets - E-Frat '94. Unity and Pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican
Ah, I got ya...Defense Body Armor Programs

I would've liked to have seen that. Too bad it isn't scheduled for later today.

58 posted on 06/10/2007 4:09:13 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: unspun
I also heard a reporter say that it was turned down by the Pentagon before it was ever tested by them.

Not quite turned down - not authorized for use. There's a difference.

When it comes to body armor, you can't issue it and assume it's safe to use, *then* test it. You have to ensure that it meets the standards first. So, the Army said, "This stuff is not authorized for use until it's been tested." When the Army did test it, it failed miserably. Pinnacle Armor then went running to the press instead of fixing the problems with their product.

No conspiracy, no coverup, no vast plot to screw the American soldier. Quite simply, it's a substandard product with really good marketing.

59 posted on 06/10/2007 4:10:30 AM PDT by Terabitten (Virginia Tech Corps of Cadets - E-Frat '94. Unity and Pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: admiral52

DragonSkin’s in deep doody...looks like they’ll be joining Richard Davis in taking over the management of Unicor armor.


60 posted on 06/10/2007 4:11:20 AM PDT by Terabitten (Virginia Tech Corps of Cadets - E-Frat '94. Unity and Pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson