I’m really trying to get my arms around this situation. If my home was vandalized, I may setup a sting operation to catch the vandals, I might question the neighbors, but one always evaluates the intended outcome against the cost when it is being paid for out of pocket. The problem here, as in so many other cases (scooter libby, the NSA recordings, just to name a few) seems to be that when a person in charge of the public’s purse is not paying the bills themselves, they have decided it is OK to spend the public’s money on a witch hunt. Now granted, the theft is a big deal, fire the perpetrator and anyone even remotely involved in it, but to let an investigation go on without checking back on a weekly basis how much the investigating is costing is worse than the original crime. Am I right?
Yes, you are right. But why is this “green band” group involved? Is there a eco-terrorist situation? Why the “KKK” grafitti? Why the “death threats” over some “cheap” palm trees? There seems to be a lot more than a simple graft and corruption scheme..............