Have at it......
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
m16s are weaksauce, we should give them all of them and replace our guns with hk416s and fn scars, who cares if they arent american
2 posted on
06/05/2007 5:42:17 PM PDT by
trd6478
To: SJackson; jveritas; FARS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; knighthawk; Marine_Uncle; SandRat; Steel Wolf; ...
3 posted on
06/05/2007 5:42:31 PM PDT by
elhombrelibre
(Al Qaeda knows Iraq's strategic value, yet the Democrats work day and night for our defeat there.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Given the mission and environment, I'd only trade if it was in a .308 flavor....
4 posted on
06/05/2007 5:44:31 PM PDT by
GoldCountryRedneck
("Why can’t we start solving the problem by breaking up Big Government?"- MortMan)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
5 posted on
06/05/2007 5:51:56 PM PDT by
Bob J
(nks)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
6 posted on
06/05/2007 5:52:00 PM PDT by
Bob J
(nks)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Yesh, poor Iraqi’s. I’ll take an AK over an M16 any day. Especially in a dirty, sandstorm prone desert environment.
The M16 doesn’t fare all that well in urban combat either. The 5.56 doesn’t have the mass to punch through walls and cars nearly as well as the 7.62.
9 posted on
06/05/2007 6:04:27 PM PDT by
Arthalion
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
JMHO~~~Bad move,,,the AK is a far better weapon than the
M-16 type rifle,,,any of them,,,they WILL NOT operate
with any sand/etc. in the action,,,the AK will,,,
this ammo problem(stealing) is BS,,,the world is full of AK ammo,,,it will never “dry-up”...
11 posted on
06/05/2007 6:21:24 PM PDT by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
BS. The Ak is perfect for that enviroment and if we had used them we still would have won in 3 weeks. Now the Iraqis wont clean them, they will jam and they can get captured and beheaded on al jazeera and you are out $250 in tax dollars for each one when they already had serviceable AKs.
14 posted on
06/05/2007 6:33:28 PM PDT by
omega4179
(El 43.o presidente de los Estados Unidos De Norteamérica Jorge W Bush)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Once while talking with a former Navy SEAL, I was told that when he was in Vietnam, he was shooting at an oncoming Vietcong with an M-16. He said “I knew that I hit that SOB at least 10 times and he still kept on coming. A guy next to me shot the same soldier with an M-14 once and he went down.”
To: ASC2006
FYI
25 posted on
06/05/2007 7:45:50 PM PDT by
Chgogal
(Vote Al Qaeda. Vote Democrat.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
If their goal is to prevent ammo stealing, they will be sadly dissappointed. The Iranians have a 5.56mm NATO rifle that they have been smuggling into Iraq.
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
"....and be photographed with the serial number of his new M-16." American troops are held responsible for their weapons, don't know why it should be different anywhere else.
35 posted on
06/05/2007 11:49:59 PM PDT by
cookcounty
(No journalist ever won a prize for reporting the facts. --Telling big stories? Now that's a hit.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Great ... send them north to fight off the Turks now.
39 posted on
06/06/2007 12:43:26 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(Killing all of your enemies without mercy is the only sure way of sleeping soundly at night.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson