Posted on 06/05/2007 4:39:24 AM PDT by jla
FROM CARL BERNSTEIN TO THE BROADDRICK RAPE: Connecting the Dots
HILLARY CALLS NEW BOOKS 'CASH FOR REHASH.' (NOT SO FAST, MISSUS CLINTON.)
by Mia T
6/04/2007
Howard Wolfson doth protest too little.
Yawn in tow--or is it a smirk?--the clinton flack is making the rounds trying to convince us that the two new hillary books about to hit the stores, "A Woman in Charge," by Carl Bernstein of 'Woodward and'/Watergate fame, and "Her Way," by former New York Times reporter Jeff Gerth and current one Don Van Natta Jr., are nothing new.
But Wolfson's claim--and his yawn--are belied by his tactic: That is, if these books are simply warmed over calumny, why the redundancy of clinton schemes trying to kill them, (and kill them preemptively, no less)?
Listen to clinton operatives Wolfson, Philippe Reines et al. Their carefully crafted sound bites--"rehash for cash" and "Is it possible to be quoted yawning?'--reveal real concern in the clinton camp about the books.
Thanx - I’ve missed Mia T’s posts.
Thought for a moment she was back at FR.
Yep according to Hillary anything her hubby did was Ok. The women were to blame and needed to be shown up as intigators and/or worthless liars.
While does Hillary sound like the most radical Sharia law Mullah when it come to showing women a lack of respect and treating them as lower than human if they were connected in any way to Bill????
Where did she go? Travis is back, apparently.
Still shows as “This account has been banned or suspended.”
Howard Wolfson’s butt is going to be under oath in Paul v Clinton this year. He was in a conference call recorded by Peter Paul that discussed the Hollywood Gala costing over a million dollars. Peter agreed to pay for half, but he ultimately paid for the whole thing. Wolfson has been lying about it for years. Oh, yes. David Rosen was on that conference call. He was the one who swore under oath in Los Angeles Superior Court they he didn’t know the costs. They were being hidden from him. I think the civil trial is going to reveal some pejury, folks.
So, you can put youtube “watch links” in the articles, but not in the comments? I’ve never had any luck doing it in comments, but I thought I had tried in a post once and it failed as well.....
You’re welcome.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.