Posted on 06/04/2007 10:19:30 PM PDT by goldstategop
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Doubtful. They just understood that the love-making would come after the war-making, and war-winning!
Great point, well put: leftist have made the private public, and the public private. They have perverted by inverting.
So what does the increasing ubiquity of such stickers tell us?
It tells us that there is a large group of total morons
infesting America .
Also their commie mother's never spanked their rear end, washed out their mouth with soap or taught them manners.
The hate the liberal left have for the right brings out the worst in them and then there’s nothing remaining.
There’s a temptation to say “Cu#k Farter” but I won’t (at least not in public ;-). It might be clever but unlike most leftists I don’t feel hate inside, just pity.
—Every day I see at least one car, usually more than one, sporting a bumper sticker that reads, “Buck Fush.” —
BTW, on Telegraph Ave. sidewalks in Berserkeley they’re not subtle, they hawk bumper stickers with the whole epithet spelled out correctly.
In SF (Haight-Ashbury) they’re slightly more civilized ‘cause they still need the tourists. After the 2006 election there were “Impeach Satan” posters of Cheney in a devil costume (ironically a few blocks away from the original “Church of Satan”: talk about projecting their own shortcomings onto their political rivals...)
Hatred, bias, resentment, deception and manipulation tell us everything we need to know about that person, and as soon as we detect that in them, we should move on in the quest for intelligent life here on earth.
i have to admit.. your joke was very witty.
How about we...
When one comes to the understanding that most liberals have the emotional maturity of a 13 or 14 year old their rhetoric makes more sense.
" 1. Critical Theory and its integral group of sub-theories by its very essence consists of destructive criticism of the social order to foment a non-violent social revolution in America.
2. The social order by definition consists of those in varying levels of position, power and influence which can be simplified into those in the higher order and those in the lower order.
3. A social revolution is by definition an inversion of the social order whereby there is an exchange of position, power and influence between those of the higher order and those of the lower order,
4. For a non-violent social revolution to be successfully executed, those of the higher order must be brought into a psychic condition of voluntary submission to those of the lower order.
5. The creation of this psychic condition means that those of the higher order by their own induced volition become willing to agree to an exchange of position, power and influence with those of the lower order.
6. As the social order is formed in the first place under the prevailing culture set by custom and tradition as inherited wisdom, inversion of the culture itself is required in order to bring about the psychic condition of submission of the higher order.
7. An inversion of the culture really means an inversion of the prevailing belief system whereby the beliefs of those of the higher order are exchanged for beliefs of those of the lower order.
8. The inversion of beliefs means the belief in the authority of those of the higher order to set and enforce standards of thinking and behavior for the society is dissolved in favor of belief in the authority of those in the lower order to think and do as they please.
9. This inversion of the structure of authority really means an inversion of the moral order and so leads to disorder, chaos, and social disintegration."
Who Placed American Men in a Psychic 'Iron Cage?'
Part II The Thread of 'Cultural Marxism'
http://www.newtotalitarians.com/PsychicIronCagePartII.html
Liberalisn IS narcissism.
I’ve known about the Frankfurt School for some time, but had tended to view them as Ivory Tower refugees of the stillborn European revolution. It was thought that the bulk of their attention was devoted to weaving newer and more elaborate theories to explain why ‘advanced capitalism’ kept getting better and communist societies were monstrosities. Obvious oversight: their mental gymnastics engaged in more than the simple ‘why’ of their failures.
My thoughts in response to the article didn’t extend to the postwar Marxists. Maybe my conception is too materialistic: I tend to focus on our material wealth, and how that has provided an unprecedented era of health, leisure and affluence. We brats have had too much time at recess.
But it is true, whether planned or not, that the public sphere has suffered the invasion of words, images, actions and deeds that don’t belong there. At the same time, the private sphere— where one should do, say, and believe pretty much of what one wants— has shrunk, almost it seems, in direct proportion. Decorum is promoted for the bedroom, but not for the public street. This is a problem, to put it mildly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.