Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/04/2007 1:32:22 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: neverdem

So what, the Bush justice system isn’t going to prosecute him anyway.


2 posted on 06/04/2007 1:49:30 AM PDT by liliesgrandpa (The Republican Party - spineless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The problem is, we’ll never know the details, unless he turns on the Clintons, which generally isn’t good for one’s health.


3 posted on 06/04/2007 1:50:52 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Man, these Democrats are absolute geniuses at coverups. Whatever he destroyed would probably damned Hillary.


4 posted on 06/04/2007 1:54:43 AM PDT by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Many Repubs took note; apparently not the one's that mattered however. Did our Congressional Repub Leadership take note (beyond a lone voice or two)? For that matter, do not recall President Bush ever weighing in here. . .

Have noted as well; the reluctance of Justice to execute just that; on America's behalf. Could not even muster 'will' to have Sandy honor the obligatory lie detector test as per his terms of agreement. Justice of course, has officially, 'closed the case'.

So. . .beyond Burger; WHO is taking note of our Justice Department; and it's efforts to subvert the truth - so as to protect and enhance the Clinton 'legacy'. A legacy that boldly recasts, not only the Clinton's past; but ours; and by turn, alters the probabilities from which our future - America's future - unfolds.

(Beyond Burger. . .beyond Plame/Wilson. . .beyond CIA. . .beyond Bush Administration; what has Justice Deparatment wrought; on it's own behalf. . .and WHY are they getting away with it?)

6 posted on 06/04/2007 2:29:25 AM PDT by cricket (If you want to lose a mile; give a Lib an inch. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: potlatch; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; neverdem




9 posted on 06/04/2007 2:47:00 AM PDT by devolve ( _Illegal_Aliens_Killed_25_Americans_Today That*s_25/Day_175/Wk_710/Mo_8500/Yr Compare_Iraq_&_911_)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The Bush administration’s veneer chipped off irretrievably by looking the other way whilst Sandy “Burgler” thieved.


14 posted on 06/04/2007 3:16:53 AM PDT by So Circumstanced
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The only person who knows what information was lost is Sandy Berger. And he isn't talking.

Why should he talk? He got away with it cold. Or, more precisely, the Bush administration allowed him to get away with it.

I think my real disillusionment with this administration, my first outbreak of BDS, if you will -- began with Sandy Berger.

Until then, I had managed to rationalize away all the other boneheaded administration moves I kept seeing out of sheer loyalty to the idea of a Republican presidency -- but there was just no way I could swallow this.

There is just no earthly reason I can possibly accept for the Bush Justice Department to ignore such a blatantly criminal misuse of power and privilege.

We'll never know, that's for sure. Given what he risked to pull this off, and given the common knowledge about what happens to those people who cross the Clintons, he will take whatever secret he managed to save with him to the grave.

15 posted on 06/04/2007 3:19:52 AM PDT by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS. Now an official Fredhead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It will always bother me is that Berger stole what is a piece of United States history. There will always be a question mark regarding Clinton’s actions to combat terrorism in the late 90’s. It will always be “historians will argue...” And that’s a shame.


16 posted on 06/04/2007 3:32:12 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I say there’s a 95% chance that he’s still practicing law. License? The elite don’t need no stinking liceeense.
24 posted on 06/04/2007 5:41:48 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

And people wonder why the rule of law doesn’t matter when it comes to the immigration issue.


29 posted on 06/04/2007 6:12:23 AM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Here’s the bottom line:

Given the severity of the crime that Berger committed,

it’s obvious that NOT stealing those documents would have had FAR GREATER CONSEQUENCES than the punishment for stealing them.


36 posted on 06/04/2007 6:25:01 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
What is at stake is more than what we think and say about Sandy Berger. It is more than the legacy of Bill Clinton and of George W. Bush. It is more than the prospects for Hillary Clinton becoming the Democrats' presidential nominee and ultimately the President. All of these, of course, are wrapped up in this story.

Our security and vitality of the rule of law in America are at stake as well. That should concern all whose lives and loved ones may be at risk if our nation follows the wrong path, not knowing everything that should inform our judgments. It should concern all who respect the law, all who have labored as lawyers and judges, as honorable government officials and voices for even-handed justice.

Confidence in our ability to govern ourselves erodes when high ranking POS like Sandy Berger walks in lockstep with a Just Us Department. Great men and women have given their lives for this?

39 posted on 06/04/2007 6:40:47 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

A very interesting development. Obviously, he had far more to lose by retaining his license. And it hopefully ends whatever speculation there might have been for him to return to public office under any administration.

It saddens me to read the attacks on the President here on FR. His administration may not have been able to get to the whole truth behind the Berger/Clinton story but I don’t think anyone could have.


40 posted on 06/04/2007 6:54:33 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Sandy Burglar like the Klintoons and their minions will never have to worry about serving a day behind bars because the Klintoons have a J.Edgar Hoover insurance policy.
“Honey, I knew those copies of F.B.I. files would come in handy.”


46 posted on 06/04/2007 8:26:27 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
President Bush has Sandy Bergers name tattoed on his forehead..

Berger would be in Levenworth except for Pres. Bush.. and the Berger scandal says more about Bush than about Berger..

Many should be asking who in the hell is President Bush not what was Sandy up to.. Bush covered up Sandys doings like a cat in the cat box.. Eyes should be inspecting Bush NOT Berger.. How does George Bush and Sandy Berger get on the same team?.. Unless a third party owns them BOTH...

59 posted on 06/04/2007 12:30:12 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

bttt


61 posted on 06/04/2007 12:39:25 PM PDT by Pagey (Horrible Hillary Clinton is Bad For America, Bad For Business and Bad For MY Stomach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Because Hill and Bill promised him a job in her administration.


76 posted on 06/04/2007 4:50:47 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (I'd rather be hunting with dick than driving with ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
What information was worth risking his reputation, his career, and his freedom to keep hidden? And who was he risking that for?

How about the accidental downing of a passenger jet over Long Island?

77 posted on 06/04/2007 4:57:14 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It’s dawned on me for the first time that maybe the Bushes agreed to ignore any Clinton wrongdoings as a price for Clinton/Gore dropping any further legal preceedings after the 2000 elections.

That’s all I can think of. That a deal had to be struck a long time ago where the Bushes agreed not to prosecute anything the Clintons (and their minions) did as a concession for the Clintons not making a stink over something huge.


82 posted on 06/04/2007 6:16:33 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Fred, are you in or out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Scrubbing 'Dirty Bombs' - Explosive hype short, confirms earlier reports

Our foes' emerging tactics

Who Lost Russia?

Jay Cost: Michael Bloomberg vs. the 12th Amendment really interesting!

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

118 posted on 06/05/2007 5:35:03 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson