Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Sandra Day] O'Connor: Attacks on judges 'appalling'
NewsOK.com ^ | Fri June 1, 2007 | unattributed

Posted on 06/02/2007 8:58:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last
To: BnBlFlag

Remember, Howard Phillips and Jerry Falwell warned Reagan about O’Connor, and he wouldn’t listen.


101 posted on 06/03/2007 9:04:52 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.
Apparently she seems to think that an "Independent Judiciary" is one that's in bed with the Democrats and the New World Order.

Well, the judiciary should be completely independent in the areas defined by the Constitution. But that hasn't seemed to be enough for most of them who want to go on to define the Constitution in a way that makes them sole interpreters of it.
102 posted on 06/03/2007 9:35:27 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: jude24; xzins; blue-duncan
Then they'll have to recuse themselves whenever a case comes up with which they might disagree. (It's unethical for a judge to reveal beforehand how he might rule.)

Actually it is unethical to fail to reveal how you might rule on a case beforehand. If you lean one way or the other, I think it would be important for the litigants to know. What you are sanctioning is that a judge can prejudge a case as long as he doesn't reveal his prejudices beforehand.

In my particular practice we all know all the prejudices of all the various judges and we take that into account when we make a decision as to whether or not to settle or take a case to trial. I don't think that litigants should be left in the dark as to what leanings a judge may have beforehand. They all have them. I think they should reveal them.

103 posted on 06/03/2007 10:12:52 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell; aruanan

Thanks everybody for the response. BTTT.


104 posted on 06/04/2007 4:22:35 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
I haven't been up long...coffee, more coffee!!! I don't suppose there is an explanation for the above posts?? Think I'll go back to bed.

There isn't an explanation for that post. I was simply giving him a taste of his own medicine (posting on the wrong thread). ;o)
105 posted on 06/04/2007 12:22:35 PM PDT by Jaysun (It's like people who hate corn bread and hate anchovies, but love cornchovie bread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
through immigration to America, it’s becoming more and more one world of many different kinds of people. And how they’re going to live together across the world will be the challenge, and whether our Constitution and how it fits into the governing documents of other nations

Straight out of the Communist Party playbooks. One World Communism.

"Socialism cannot exist unless it is global"

106 posted on 06/04/2007 12:26:26 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Well, Ms. O’Connor as Fred recently said - if judges are going to act like elected representatives, making laws instead of interpreting the Constitution etc., don’t be surprised if the voters start treating them like elected representatives. (paraphrasing)


107 posted on 06/04/2007 12:30:49 PM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

GretchenM: Judicial Attacks on Preborns' Right To Life Is Appalling


108 posted on 06/04/2007 12:33:28 PM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

LOL...well, you completely bumfuzzled me!


109 posted on 06/04/2007 1:46:06 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (That "broken glass" we all crawled over in 2000 has now left scars on our hearts as well !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Frankly, judges acting like supreme legislators of social policy and trashing the Constitution’s checks and balances is appalling.


110 posted on 06/04/2007 2:04:49 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson