Skip to comments.
[Sandra Day] O'Connor: Attacks on judges 'appalling'
NewsOK.com ^
| Fri June 1, 2007
| unattributed
Posted on 06/02/2007 8:58:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 last
To: BnBlFlag
Remember, Howard Phillips and Jerry Falwell warned Reagan about O’Connor, and he wouldn’t listen.
101
posted on
06/03/2007 9:04:52 PM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(Cowardice is forever!)
To: E.G.C.
Apparently she seems to think that an "Independent Judiciary" is one that's in bed with the Democrats and the New World Order.
Well, the judiciary should be completely independent in the areas defined by the Constitution. But that hasn't seemed to be enough for most of them who want to go on to define the Constitution in a way that makes them sole interpreters of it.
102
posted on
06/03/2007 9:35:27 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: jude24; xzins; blue-duncan
Then they'll have to recuse themselves whenever a case comes up with which they might disagree. (It's unethical for a judge to reveal beforehand how he might rule.)Actually it is unethical to fail to reveal how you might rule on a case beforehand. If you lean one way or the other, I think it would be important for the litigants to know. What you are sanctioning is that a judge can prejudge a case as long as he doesn't reveal his prejudices beforehand.
In my particular practice we all know all the prejudices of all the various judges and we take that into account when we make a decision as to whether or not to settle or take a case to trial. I don't think that litigants should be left in the dark as to what leanings a judge may have beforehand. They all have them. I think they should reveal them.
103
posted on
06/03/2007 10:12:52 PM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: F.J. Mitchell; aruanan
Thanks everybody for the response. BTTT.
104
posted on
06/04/2007 4:22:35 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: greyfoxx39
I haven't been up long...coffee, more coffee!!! I don't suppose there is an explanation for the above posts?? Think I'll go back to bed.
There isn't an explanation for that post. I was simply giving him a taste of his own medicine (posting on the wrong thread). ;o)
105
posted on
06/04/2007 12:22:35 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(It's like people who hate corn bread and hate anchovies, but love cornchovie bread.)
To: SunkenCiv
through immigration to America, its becoming more and more one world of many different kinds of people. And how theyre going to live together across the world will be the challenge, and whether our Constitution and how it fits into the governing documents of other nations Straight out of the Communist Party playbooks. One World Communism.
"Socialism cannot exist unless it is global"
To: SunkenCiv
Well, Ms. O’Connor as Fred recently said - if judges are going to act like elected representatives, making laws instead of interpreting the Constitution etc., don’t be surprised if the voters start treating them like elected representatives. (paraphrasing)
107
posted on
06/04/2007 12:30:49 PM PDT
by
Let's Roll
(As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
GretchenM: Judicial Attacks on Preborns' Right To Life Is Appalling
108
posted on
06/04/2007 12:33:28 PM PDT
by
GretchenM
(What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus)
To: Jaysun
LOL...well, you completely bumfuzzled me!
109
posted on
06/04/2007 1:46:06 PM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(That "broken glass" we all crawled over in 2000 has now left scars on our hearts as well !)
To: SunkenCiv
Frankly, judges acting like supreme legislators of social policy and trashing the Constitution’s checks and balances is appalling.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson