Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Set To Vote on Jerusalem and Site of U.S. Embassy
New York Sun ^ | BY ELI LAKE

Posted on 06/02/2007 2:28:52 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2

WASHINGTON — The House of Representatives is scheduled to vote next week on a resolution calling for President Bush to move the American Embassy in Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, strengthening Israel's position against recurring diplomatic efforts to take away its capital.

The resolution, which passed the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on May 23, commemorates the 40th anniversary of Israel's victory in the Six Day War that unified Jerusalem. It also calls on Mr. Bush to adhere to the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, which authorized the funds to begin moving the embassy and declared that it was American policy to recognize the city as the capital of the Jewish state.

The House resolution, scheduled for a floor vote on Tuesday, "reiterates its commitment to the provisions of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 and calls upon the President and all United States officials to abide by its provisions."

While Mr. Bush promised as a first-time presidential candidate to begin the process of moving the embassy, he has exercised a waiver in the 1995 law to avoid penalties the law imposes for failing to move the embassy. The fact that a Democratic-controlled Congress would press him on the issue could signal that he and Secretary of State Rice, who has been aiming to revive peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs, have little domestic political leeway to pressure Israel for concessions on its capital.

Presidents and presidential candidates have promised since 1980 to move the embassy to Jerusalem, only to renege on the promise once in office. As a candidate for president on August 28, 2000, George W. Bush told a B'nai B'rith convention, "Something else will happen should I be elected: as soon as I take office I will begin the process of moving the U.S. ambassador to the city Israel has chosen as its capital."

Mr. Bush never moved the embassy, or even began the process, and has since signed the waiver built into the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy at every six-month interval, to notify Congress of his intention to ignore the legislation.

Palestinian Arab leaders have expressed a desire to claim Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian Arab State, while Israeli leaders have insisted that Jerusalem will remain Israel's undivided capital.

When asked for a comment about the House resolution calling for America to move the embassy, a State Department spokesman, David Foley said, "The State Department position remains unchanged, Jerusalem is a permanent status issue to be negotiated between the parties."

America's and Israel's terrorist enemies have also weighed in on the Jerusalem embassy debate. In 2000, following Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon, Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah fthreatened to send America's diplomats home in coffins if the embassy is moved to Jerusalem, which the Arabs call Quds.

In an e-mail, one of the sponsors of the House Resolution, the chairman of the House International Relations Committee, Rep. Tom Lantos, said he thought the fortieth anniversary of the war that united Jerusalem was a good time to take stock.

"In the shadow of regional hate, Israelis have produced a remarkably prosperous and vibrant democracy. Yet their enemies are as determined, and as threatening, as ever," he said. "Thankfully, Jordan and Egypt have embraced a vision of peace with Israel since that war four decades ago; may the years to come bring Israel ever closer to a lasting peace with its neighbors."

The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Joseph Biden, a Democrat of Delaware, is expected to introduce a similar resolution commemorating the Six Day War next week as well. Both resolutions are expected to pass with wide majorities. The House resolution's co-sponsors include Reps. Eliot Engel, Gary Ackerman, and Joseph Crowley, all Democrats of New York, as well as Reps. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Dan Burton, who are Republicans.

The resolution's introduction won praise from some Jewish leaders. The director of the Orthodox Union's Institute for Public Policy, Nathan Diament, said it "would send a clear message to the administration that it is time to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to its rightful place in Jerusalem. Just as the United States locates its embassy in the duly designated capitals of other nations, so too it should locate its embassy in Israel's recognized capital." American Arab leaders have condemned similar bills in the past, saying the tilt toward Israel damaged American credibility as a mediator in the negotiations. _________________________________________________________

It is time for the U.S. embassy in Israel to move to its rightful place in Jerusalem. Call or write your congressman and tell them to vote for Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

Capitol Switchboard (202-224-3121)

Find your representative: http://www.house.gov/


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushpromise; jerusalem; jerusalemcapital; telaviv; usembassy

1 posted on 06/02/2007 2:28:56 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Man, these conservative tests for President Bush just keep on coming

We are holding Bush accountable for the immigration disaster, but G-d will be the one Bush has to answer for this one.

2 posted on 06/02/2007 2:32:45 PM PDT by Popman (New American Dream: Move to Mexican, cross the border, become an illegal. free everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

If it pisses on the mooselimbs I say put it in the heart of Jerusalem.


3 posted on 06/02/2007 3:04:40 PM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

the US embassy should have been in Jerusalem years ago!!!!

this better be voted affirmative.....let the muzzies know where the US stands/who they stand with/and who are their allies!!!!


4 posted on 06/02/2007 3:45:56 PM PDT by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
America's and Israel's terrorist enemies have also weighed in on the Jerusalem embassy debate.

And moving the Embasy would hurt us how?

In 2000, following Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon, Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah threatened to send America's diplomats home in coffins if the embassy is moved to Jerusalem, which the Arabs call Quds.

He hadn't threated to do that on general principals anyway? I am surprised. /s

I would like to see a State Department Official in public session explain what advantage not moving our Embassy gains us. I know the Embassy is in Tel Aviv for historic reasons, that was the capitol when the place was built.

5 posted on 06/02/2007 5:12:57 PM PDT by Fraxinus (My opinion worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Do it now, or do it later.

The City of Peace will be the ultimate home of all civility, and the might to back it up.

I read that somewhere once.


6 posted on 06/02/2007 5:17:38 PM PDT by Radix (Lighting a flame to dead leaves, and inhaling the toxic vapors associated is pretty dumb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

Worth remembering that the Embassy site is in West Jerusalem, part of Israel since independence.

7 posted on 06/03/2007 6:16:57 AM PDT by SJackson (Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fraxinus
I would like to see a State Department Official in public session explain what advantage not moving our Embassy gains us. I know the Embassy is in Tel Aviv for historic reasons, that was the capitol when the place was built.

Actually Israel declared Jerusalem the Capital in 1949. Even the foreign ministry has been moved there by the early 50s. The only legal reason not to move is that it threatens the security of the United States, which GWB certifies twice a year.

8 posted on 06/03/2007 6:34:55 AM PDT by SJackson (Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
It also calls on Mr. Bush to adhere to the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, which authorized the funds to begin moving the embassy and declared that it was American policy to recognize the city as the capital of the Jewish state.

This is the crux of the entire issue.
Jerusalem should have been recognized as the Capital of Israel in 1968... it was in muslim-mass-murderer hands only because the arab muslims tried to destroy Israel as soon as she was born.

In all other instances in the world, that I know of, the country in question decides where her capital is. No one else has a say in that.

9 posted on 06/03/2007 1:08:40 PM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson