Blog:
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003793.html
June 22, 2007
“Mutilation And Killing For Muslim “Honor”: Part One (of 3)”
(Note: “This article by Adrian Morgan (Giraldus Cambrensis of Western Resistance) appeared earlier today in Family Security Matters and is reproduced with their permission.”)
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003795.html
June 25, 2007
“Mutilation And Killing For Muslim “Honor” - Part 2 of 3”
(Note: “This article by Adrian Morgan (Giraldus Cambrensis of Western Resistance) appeared earlier today in Family Security Matters and is reproduced with their permission.”)
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003796.html
June 26, 2007
“Mutilation And Killing For Muslim “Honor” - Part 3 of 3”
(Note: “This article by Adrian Morgan (Giraldus Cambrensis of Western Resistance) appeared earlier today in Family Security Matters and is reproduced with their permission.”)
http://www.danielpipes.org/article/4656
“Salman Rushdie and British Backbone”
by Daniel Pipes
New York Sun
June 26, 2007
ARTICLE SNIPPET: “I welcome the knighting because, for all his political mistakes, Rushdie is indeed a fine novelist. I wish I could agree with Dhume that this recognition of him suggests “the pendulum has begun to swing” in Britain against appeasing radical Islam.
But I cannot. Instead, I draw two conclusions: First, Rushdie should plan around the fact of Khomeini’s edict being permanent, to expire only when he does. Second, the British government should take seriously the official Pakistani threat of suicide terrorism, which amounts to a declaration of war and an operational endorsement. So far, it has not done that.
Other than an ambassadorial statement of “deep concern,” Whitehall insists that the minister’s threat will not harm a “very good relationship” with Pakistan. It has even indicated that Ijaz ul-Haq is welcome in Britain if on a private visit. (Are suicide bombers also welcome, so long as they are not guests of the government?) Until the Pakistani authorities retract and apologize for Ijaz ul-Haq’s outrageous statement, London must not conduct business-as-usual with Islamabad.
Now that would constitute “British backbone.””