Replies

SerpentDove:

Thanks for calling me cheap and dishonest. Not.

I see signs of hate in front of me, by the needless ugliness shown to the President and others who have taken the wrong view in this debate, and I call hate.

Why would I try to stifle "dissent"? I TOTALLY OPPOSE THE BILL AND HAVE SAID SO AND SAID WHAT I THINK WE NEED INSTEAD. It isn't dissent that's the problem.

It's hate speech, profane, demeaning, ugly as sin, X rated and the rest. You name it. I've read it. The "F" bomb repeatedly thrown at the President, and bragging about it. Desire to spit in his face if only they could. Kiss my bleep, over and over. Saying if he's impeached, fine. One world order. Daddy's boy. Liar. Traitor. That's "dissent"??? Where? In a DU sewer??

My views on the illegal immigration issue are available here, on this very thread. Here they are:

To: Radix; NordP; jrooney

Radix:

Thanks for your reply. I hope you read that part of my post that states my opposition to the bill. I also have been supporting Duncan Hunter from well before he announced his run for President.

I'm glad you stated that there's no reason to hate anyone over this. Hate is dripping like molten venom from most threads now.

As to your simple point about what's so hard to comprehend about the key word, ILLEGAL,

I'll say this. We need to get things in the right order. A border fence and other measures to secure what needs securing.

After that, there's a problem with what to do since untold millions of people are here who came illegally, originally. I think that's the part that truly flummoxes those who have come up with this bill. There's the additional need for some type of regulated work permits going forward, and what would the details of that be.

They can't seem to grasp that no matter those connected, troubling issues,

they need to do the enforcement until people can see with their own eyes that the government is trustworthy to do it.

Until then, the rest of their talk and bill crafting is just pouring salt on a hemorraghing wound.