Ron Paul Nearly Doubles Donations Since Butting Heads with Rudy Giuliani

www.transworldnews.com ^ | 5/31/07 | Finditt

[wagglebee]

I find it shameful that anyone would dare call themselves a Republican and at the same time support America’s defeat and humiliation.

[mimaw]

Why are they supporting him in secret? Let’s hear their names.

[B4Ranch]

>Guess it’s upsetting that Paul is the only one out of the lot that actually knows what the Constitution says and follows it to the letter.<

Very upsetting to a neocon.

[Oberon]

I find it shameful that anyone would dare call themselves a Republican and at the same time support America’s defeat and humiliation.

Yeah, that funny belief that Congress is the branch of government empowered to declare war...what was he thinking?!?

[humblegunner]

That "guy" is SO 80's!

And kind of fruity.

[wagglebee]

Are you saying that Congress DIDN’T authorize the use of force in Iraq?

[unspun]

Ron Paul Nearly Doubles Donations Since Butting Heads with Rudy Giuliani

[elkfersupper]

When are you Paul fans going to give it up?

Never.

If it isn't him this time, you'd better pray it will be somebody like him soon.

[elkfersupper]

I know of some very wealthy and influential people (including former congress critters) who are backing Paul. They are old-school conservatives — hardcore.

Same here.

[JTN]

I would also like to see a link to Malkin’s retraction, even if it is weak.

It's here, but it ain't much of a retraction. After acknowledging that she was dead wrong, she proceeds to try to smear Paul with innuendo. Yeah, I know it's hard to believe that Michelle Malkin would do such a thing, but it's true! She did! And by "do such a thing" I mean admit she was wrong.

[elkfersupper]

I say let him be honest - run as a Libertarian - he is NOT a Republican!

Works for me.

That's what some said about Ronald Reagan.

[elkfersupper]

ever wonder why so many ‘Republicans’ jumped ship in the last election and thus allowed the current crop of idiots to control Congress ? A glimpse at the Paul camp might hold some clues...

Prior to that, there was the Goldwater camp.

History repeats itself.

[Sleeping Beauty]

I read through the first 50 posts and noticed the usual suspects flaming Dr. Paul. I have to wonder: If he has no chance and he’s really a nut-case, then why do they keep clicking on these threads? Is it a sort of cyber-whistle as they pass the cyber-graveyard? Perhaps they know something we all know, only they’re afraid to admit; maybe, just maybe, Dr. Paul is right, they’re wrong and he stands a good chance of being the next President of the United States. If they’re right and he does stand no chance of winning why do they spend so much time and energy arguing against him? Inquiring minds want to know

I notice the same thing. I don't think Paul would get the nomination. He's way too "early American." But it is amazing to watch how terrified people are of Ron Paul -- and the absurd lengths they go to to smear him. We usually reserve that for our opponents.

(I'm a Romney supporter, so I have no skin in this game.)

[The_Eaglet]

Thanks for the info. It was not much of a retraction, but it was thorough coverage among the negative spin.

[Calvinist_Dark_Lord]

I read through the first 50 posts and noticed the usual suspects flaming Dr. Paul. I have to wonder: If he has no chance and he’s really a nut-case, then why do they keep clicking on these threads? Is it a sort of cyber-whistle as they pass the cyber-graveyard? Perhaps they know something we all know, only they’re afraid to admit; maybe, just maybe, Dr. Paul is right, they’re wrong and he stands a good chance of being the next President of the United States. If they’re right and he does stand no chance of winning why do they spend so much time and energy arguing against him? Inquiring minds want to know.

It's actually our fault really. You see, we're easily amused, and sending the RINObots on a Pavlovian tail chasing frenzy gives us great amusement.

Cheaper than booze or drugs, and far less damaging to our health.

[Calvinist_Dark_Lord]

Malkin was flinging more garbage. It certainly was not a retraction of any inuendo that she tossed out on FAUX NEWS.

Her interests in pathetic attempts to destroy Dr. Paul’s credibility and paint him as an anti-Semite and/or 9/11 truther are self-evident.

[Checkers]

“So, Paul went from $10 to $20 in the bank?”

The monthly charge is going to eat that up pretty fast.

[Checkers]

“Ron Paul is the Dennis Kucinich of the right.”

Is his wife as hot as Dennis’s?

[Checkers]

“RINO Liberaltarian Traitor Paul has LESS THAN $1 million on hand, in modern campaigns that’s essentially a zero balance.”

If he can’t run a campaign, why should I believe he can run the Executive Branch?

[Allegra]

When are you Paul fans going to give it up?

When the Mother Ship comes to get them. ;-)